Mike Looijmans wrote ..
> I've read through the documentation. I like the interface - just call
> ap_update_mtime for every object your response depends on (and another
> great feature: It starts with the mtime of the file, so that updates to
> the script also invalidate the cached response).
>
>
Hi,
There is something I'd like to do for the 3.3 version : it is to
refactor the test suite. It's more a chore than real development, but
the current test suite is slowly becoming big and quite difficult to
maintain.
What I'd like to do is simply split the test runner and the published
tests in
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
There is something I'd like to do for the 3.3 version : it is to
refactor the test suite. It's more a chore than real development, but
the current test suite is slowly becoming big and quite difficult to
maintain.
Also, I think the size and complexity may be intimidat
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=comments#action_12365923
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-78:
The following comment from Justin Erenkrantz was sent to the python-dev mailing
list :
FWIW, don't ever expect code that r
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Depending on Grisha's preference, I think we should either put the
content in svn and have a cron job on modpython.org do a nightly update,
or start using the Apache infrastructure for the website. See
http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html for mo
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes:
>
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> > Depending on Grisha's preference, I think we should either put the
> > content in svn and have a cron job on modpython.org do a nightly update,
> > or start using the Apache infrastructure for the website. Se
My only comment is that, especially if tests are being split into
separate files, that the access/error log files be distinct for each
test with a name incorporating the name of the test. I always
found it a pain to try and dig through a big log of multiple tests
trying to work out which was the o
On 11/02/2006, at 7:22 AM, Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy writes:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Depending on Grisha's preference, I think we should either put the
content in svn and have a cron job on modpython.org do a nightly
update,
or start using the
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
Could we run mod_python on apache.org's site, like, say, the current
version? ;-)
We could ask again, but last time the answer was no, and I tend to agree.
But I also understand that we have Solaris servers on which zones can be
created where
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
Could we run mod_python on apache.org's site, like, say, the current
version? ;-)
We could ask again, but last time the answer was no, and I tend to
agree.
Also agree.
But I also understand that we have
Thanks for the input Justin.
Jim
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/9/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to see a change in the way the website is handled so the
maintenance burden no longer falls on Grisha. He has paid his dues after
all. :)
Depending on Grisha's preference, I
On 2/9/06, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I recollect, the only real issue was the implications on Win32 platform
> of changing the APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(s) test to (s == APR_SUCCESS),
> because of Win32 the definition was originally:
>
> #define APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(s) ((s) == A
On 2/9/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to see a change in the way the website is handled so the
> maintenance burden no longer falls on Grisha. He has paid his dues after
> all. :)
>
> Depending on Grisha's preference, I think we should either put the
> content in svn and ha
On 2/10/06, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could ask again, but last time the answer was no, and I tend to agree.
> But I also understand that we have Solaris servers on which zones can be
> created where we could run our own httpd.
httpd.zones.apache.org is available
On 2/10/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> message from Justin Erenkrantz has not shown up on list? Is Justin
> subscribed? I'll cc his message to the list in a separate email.
Moderators (Joe S., Grisha, and Greg) haven't approved my emails yet.
I've modded through my messages and ad
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/10/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
message from Justin Erenkrantz has not shown up on list? Is Justin
subscribed? I'll cc his message to the list in a separate email.
Moderators (Joe S., Grisha, and Greg) haven't approved my emails yet.
I've modded
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/10/06, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We could ask again, but last time the answer was no, and I tend to agree.
But I also understand that we have Solaris servers on which zones can be
created where we could run our own httpd.
httpd.zones
On 2/10/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we would have our own httpd instance in the zone, right?
infra@ allocates zones to a PMC. So, you'd have to 'share' the server
with the rest of the httpd PMC. But, I'm sure we can work something
out. -- justin
I would he happy to help out if my experience would be useful.
http://thinkflat.com/home/portfolio/
Lemme know if there's anything I can do :)
John M.
__
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
>
>> Could we run
19 matches
Mail list logo
