The release24-maint branch is FROZEN from 00:00 UTC, 2005-03-30
(in about 11 hours from now).
As usual, unless you're in the set (Anthony, MvL, Fred), please hold off
on checkins to the branch until I send a message unfreezing it. Once
we've had the appropriate brown-paper-bag time delay, the
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Having to write
[x for x in seq]
to produce a copy of a list doesn't seem that outrageous to me, and I
don't find the predicate-less case of your proposal that convincing:
[x in seq]
seems somehow too terse.
And is already
Has anyone ever considered using SCons to build Python? SCons is a
great build tool written in Python that provides some Autoconf-like
functionality (http://www.scons.org). It seems like this type of
self-hosting would be a great testament to the power of Python as well
as helping to reinforce the
I'm posting to this list to again generate open discussion on the
problem in current Python that an int is used in both the Python
sequence protocol and the Python buffer protocol.
The problem is that a C-int is typically only 4 bytes long while there
are many applications (mmap for example),
On Mar 29, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Aahz wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005, Adam MacBeth wrote:
Has anyone ever considered using SCons to build Python? SCons is a
great build tool written in Python that provides some Autoconf-like
functionality (http://www.scons.org). It seems like this type of
self-hosting
Adam MacBeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone ever considered using SCons to build Python?
Well, er, there's an obvious problem here somewhere...
SCons is a great build tool written in Python that provides some
Autoconf-like functionality (http://www.scons.org). It seems like
this type
Travis Oliphant wrote:
What is the opinion of people on this list about how to fix the
problem. I believe Martin was looking at the problem and had told
Perry Greenfield he was fixing it. Apparently at the recent PyCon,
Perry and he talked and Martin said the problem is harder than he had
Walter Dörwald wrote:
So is this change wanted? useful? implementable with reasonable effort? Or
just not worth it?
I think it is just not worth it. This means I won't attempt to implement
it. I think I defined originally the __module__ attribute for classes to
support better pickling (and defined
Walter Dörwald wrote:
For XML: 1) Those classes are the element types and the nested classes
are the attributes. 2) Being able to define those attributes as separate
classes makes it possible to implement custom functionality (e.g. for
validation or for handling certain attribute types like URLs,
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 20:55, Adam MacBeth wrote:
Has anyone ever considered using SCons to build Python? SCons is a
great build tool written in Python that provides some Autoconf-like
functionality (http://www.scons.org). It seems like this type of
self-hosting would be a great testament to
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having to write
[x for x in seq]
to produce a copy of a list doesn't seem that outrageous to me,
Except for (currently) leaving the last value of sequence bound to 'x'
after making the copy, how is the above
Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 297 open (+11) / 2812 closed (+11) / 3109 total (+22)
Bugs: 871 open ( +1) / 4900 closed (+33) / 5771 total (+34)
RFE : 175 open ( +0) / 150 closed ( +0) / 325 total ( +0)
New / Reopened Patches
__
Decimal
On Mar 29, 2005, at 17:41, Terry Reedy wrote:
...
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having to write
[x for x in seq]
to produce a copy of a list doesn't seem that outrageous to me,
Except for (currently) leaving the last value of sequence bound to 'x'
13 matches
Mail list logo
