On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Jesus Cea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I need to port bsddb3 to py3k, what I need to know?. Is any
*updated* document out there?.
No, but there is a not yet complete, but quite updated set of examples.
http://code.google.com/p/python-incompatibility/
This is
If the 3.0 API of a module is going to involve breakage which
requires authors to update their applications wouldn't this be a good
time to PEP-8-ify the module? (Not suggesting that threading would
fall into this category.)
Nick Updating application code to deal with a
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:31 PM, r.m.oudkerk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31/05/2008, Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/5/30 Farshid Lashkari [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not sure if there will be any side affects to modifying
sys.executable though. Should this be the official way of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick We fixed the module names that used mixed case - the amount of
Nick work that turned out to be involved in just doing that much for
Nick PEP 3108 makes me shudder at the thought of trying to fix all of
Nick the standard library APIs that currently
From: Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All this makes me lean towards a rejection of this proposal -- it
seems worse than no proposal at all. It could perhaps be rescued by
adding some small set of defined operations.
By subclassing Sequence, we get index() and count() mixins for free.
We
Please try to find the largest set of methods that you're comfortable
with. __add__ comes to mind.
Note that if you add __hash__, this rules out bytearray -- is that
your intention? __hash__ is intentionally not part of the read-only
ABCs because read-only doesn't mean immutable.
Also, (again)
On 2008-06-02 01:30, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:37 AM, M.-A. Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I probably wasn't clear enough:
Why can't we have both PyString *and* PyBytes exposed as C
APIs (ie. visible in code and in the linker) in 2.x, with one redirecting
to
On 5/31/08, Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it seems that maybe simply setExecutable() isn't the correct
abstraction here, but maybe a factory approach, so the entire process
creation mechanism can be replaced rather than just the name of the
executable to spawn?
Indeed. If the
Nick We fixed the module names that used mixed case - the amount of
Nick work that turned out to be involved in just doing that much for
Nick PEP 3108 makes me shudder at the thought of trying to fix all of
Nick the standard library APIs that currently don't follow the style
Are you completelly sure of adding those guys: PyBytes_InternXXX ???
On 6/1/08, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:37 AM, M.-A. Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-05-30 00:57, Nick Coghlan wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
* Why can't we have
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:33 AM, M.-A. Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, how about this? http://codereview.appspot.com/1521
Using that patch, both PyString_ and PyBytes_ APIs are available using
function stubs similar to the above. I opted to define the stub
functions right next to
-cc: python-3000
I believe those APIs are already there in the existing interface. Why does
that concern you?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Lisandro Dalcin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you completelly sure of adding those guys: PyBytes_InternXXX ???
On 6/1/08, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We are going to postpone the first beta releases by one week. We had
some problems with mail.python.org today, which prompted a query to
Guido from me about the postponement. mail.python.org should now be
back up normally now, as evidenced by
I will freely admit that I haven't followed this thread in any detail,
but if it were up to me, I'd have the 2.6 internal code use PyString
(as both what the linker sees and what the human reads in the source
code) and the 3.0 code use PyBytes for the same thing. Let the merges
be damed -- most
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will freely admit that I haven't followed this thread in any detail,
but if it were up to me, I'd have the 2.6 internal code use PyString
...
Should we read this as a BDFL pronouncement and make it so?
All that would
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for PDCurses library itself there is a Makefile in PDCurses
distribution
for Microsoft Visual C++ 2.0+ named vcwin32.mak I can't afford buying
Visual Studio to test if it works with newer versions, but logically
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We are going to postpone the first beta releases by one week. We had some
problems with mail.python.org today, which prompted a query to Guido from me
about the postponement.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now is as good a time as any to mention that on Wednesday I am flying
out to help my mother move. I don't know when she is going to have her
Internet connection set up, so I might not be back online until June
16. But
Hi all,
As a newly converted fan of str.format, it gives me pangs to see the
whole stdlib using %. I realize that str.format is not quite up to
the speed standards we'd like, but I'm sure that will change.
In any case, I'm willing to give the TLC to convert the whole stdlib
to str.format, so I
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Benjamin Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a newly converted fan of str.format, it gives me pangs to see the
whole stdlib using %. I realize that str.format is not quite up to
the speed standards we'd like, but I'm sure that will change.
In any case, I'm
20 matches
Mail list logo
