On 10/02/2011 06:34 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
There are a number of issues that are being conflated by this thread.
1) Should str += str be fast. In my opinion, the answer is an obvious and
resounding no. Strings are immutable, thus repeated string addition is
O(n**2). This is a natural
Maciej Fijalkowski fijall at gmail.com writes:
https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/59460302c713/lib_pypy/disassembler.py
this might be of interest. It's like dis module except it creates
objects instead of printing them
I think that Issue11816 (under review) aims at extending the dis
Hello,
[First off, I'm not a member of this list, so please Cc: me in a reply!]
I've found some counterintuitive behavior in collections.Counter while
hacking on the scikit-learn project [1]. I wanted to use a bunch of
Counters to do some simple term counting in a set of documents,
roughly as
+1
Because Counter is mutable object, I think += should mutate left side object.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl wrote:
Hello,
[First off, I'm not a member of this list, so please Cc: me in a reply!]
I've found some counterintuitive behavior in
Le 03/10/2011 04:19, Victor Stinner a écrit :
I restored this hack in Python 3.3 using PyUnicode_Append() in ceval.c and by
optimizing PyUnicode_Append() (try to append in-place). str+=str is closer
again to ''.join:
str += str: 696 ms
''.join(): 547 ms
I disabled temporary the optimization
I restored this hack in Python 3.3 using PyUnicode_Append() in ceval.c and by
optimizing PyUnicode_Append() (try to append in-place). str+=str is closer
again to ''.join:
Why are you checking, in unicode_resizable, whether the string is from
unicode_latin1? If it is, then it should have a
What I'm looking for is a public function that is silently updated if
python-dev decides to accept other numerical input. As I understand
from your comments below, PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal() is frozen, so
that function does indeed not help.
I would consider it reasonable for
Am 02.10.2011 17:46, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
2011/10/2 Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net:
On 10/02/11 01:14, victor.stinner wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9124a00df142
changeset: 72573:9124a00df142
parent: 72571:fa0b1e50270f
user:Victor Stinner
Hello,
I am back from holiday ;) and we haven't heard from other
implementations whether there was any difficulty for them in
implementing PEP 3151. Did I miss something (it's difficult to keep up
with many messages on a small netbook with a screen broken by a
batman-like pattern obscuring the
Le lundi 3 octobre 2011 18:04:57, vous avez écrit :
Why are you checking, in unicode_resizable, whether the string is from
unicode_latin1? If it is, then it should have a refcount of at least 2,
so the very first test in the function should already exclude it.
There is also a test on
Martin v. Löwis writes:
Also, could I remind you that a better commit message is probably
make PyUnicode_FromKindAndData raise a ValueError if the kind is
unknown.
I think this is asking too much.
This distinction is important enough that it's worth asking non-native
speakers to
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:56:04 +0200
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
I am back from holiday ;) and we haven't heard from other
implementations whether there was any difficulty for them in
implementing PEP 3151.
Alex Gaynor and Jim Baker (thank you!) just told me on IRC that
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:56:04 +0200
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
I am back from holiday ;) and we haven't heard from other
implementations whether there was any difficulty for them in
On 10/3/2011 12:23 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 02.10.2011 17:46, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
On 10/02/11 01:14, victor.stinner wrote:
PyUnicode_FromKindAndData() raises a ValueError if the kind is unknown
Also, could I remind you that a better commit message is probably
make
Is it both technically possible (with hg) and socially permissible (with
us) to edit another's commit message?
It's not technically possible, but it would be socially permissible to
fix spelling mistakes.
With hg, editing commit messages would require some sort of patch queue
system, where the
-assert(0);
+PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, invalid kind);
return NULL;
}
Is that really a ValueError? It should only be a ValueError if the user
could trigger that error. Otherwise it should be a SystemError.
You are right, ValueError is not best exception
Hello Python Developers,
I am a Program Manager with the Ecosystem Engineering team at Microsoft. We are
tracking a issue with Python 3.2.2 on Windows Developer Preview when using
Internet Explorer.
At //BUILD/http://www.buildwindows.com/ in September, Microsoft announced the
availability of
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 18:32, Ryan Wells (MP Tech Consulting LLC)
v-ry...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hello Python Developers,
** **
I am a Program Manager with the Ecosystem Engineering team at Microsoft. We
are tracking a issue with Python 3.2.2 on Windows Developer Preview when
using
Martin v. Löwis writes:
[Terry Reedy wrote:]
Is it both technically possible (with hg) and socially permissible (with
us) to edit another's commit message?
It's not technically possible,
Currently, in hg. git has a mechanism for adding notes which are
automatically displayed along
19 matches
Mail list logo
