On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
if all undocumented modules had as much documentation and articles as
ET, the world would be a lot better documented ;-)
I've posted a text version of the xml.etree.ElementTree PythonDoc here:
http://www.python.org/sf/1504046
hopefully, one of
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
if all undocumented modules had as much documentation and articles as
ET, the world would be a lot better documented ;-)
I've posted a text version of the xml.etree.ElementTree PythonDoc here:
http://www.python.org/sf/1504046
hopefully, one of
PyXML appears pretty stable (in terms of release frequency -- I have
no opinion on the code quality :-). Perhaps it could just be
incorporated into the Python svn tree, if the various owners are
willing to sign a contributor statement?
--Guido
On 6/11/06, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
PyXML appears pretty stable (in terms of release frequency -- I have
no opinion on the code quality :-). Perhaps it could just be
incorporated into the Python svn tree, if the various owners are
willing to sign a contributor statement?
That is, in itself, a
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 12:34, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
if all undocumented modules had as much documentation and articles as
ET, the world would be a lot better documented ;-)
I've posted a text version of the xml.etree.ElementTree PythonDoc here:
Here's a
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
With the introduction of the xmlcore package in Python 2.5, should we
document
xml.etree or xmlcore.etree? If someone installs PyXML with Python 2.5, I
don't think they're going to get xml.etree, which will be really confusing.
We can be sure that
On 11 jun 2006, at 12.09, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
With the introduction of the xmlcore package in Python 2.5, should
we document
xml.etree or xmlcore.etree? If someone installs PyXML with Python
2.5, I
don't think they're going to get xml.etree, which will be
Simon Percivall wrote:
how about tweaking the xml loader to map xml.foo to _xmlplus.foo
only if that subpackage really exists ?
I'm a bit confused by what the problem is. I though this was all
handled like it should be now.
that's how I thought things were done, but then I read Fred's
Neal Norwitz wrote:
The most important outstanding issue is the xmlplus/xmlcore issue.
It's not going to get fixed unless someone works on it. There's only
a few days left before beta 1. Can someone please address this?
From my point of view, I shall consider them resolved/irrelevant:
I'm
On Saturday 10 June 2006 12:34, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
if all undocumented modules had as much documentation and articles as
ET, the world would be a lot better documented ;-)
I've posted a text version of the xml.etree.ElementTree PythonDoc here:
Here's a question that we should answer
The most important outstanding issue is the xmlplus/xmlcore issue.
It's not going to get fixed unless someone works on it. There's only
a few days left before beta 1. Can someone please address this? If
that means reverting changes to maintain compatibility, so be it.
There is still the
On 6/9/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was also discussion of a change to the way quit works in
interactive mode. I see no record of it, so I guess that's not going in,
either.
It's already in 2.5a2, if I'm thinking of the same thing you are...
Paul.
On Friday, June 09, 2006, at 03:34PM, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Moore wrote:
On 6/9/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was also discussion of a change to the way quit works in
interactive mode. I see no record of it, so I guess that's not going in,
either.
It's
On 6/8/06, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most important outstanding issue is the xmlplus/xmlcore issue.
It's not going to get fixed unless someone works on it. There's only
a few days left before beta 1. Can someone please address this? If
that means reverting changes to
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006, Paul Moore wrote:
On 6/9/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was also discussion of a change to the way quit works in
interactive mode. I see no record of it, so I guess that's not going in,
either.
It's already in 2.5a2, if I'm thinking of the same thing you
On 6/9/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006, Paul Moore wrote: On 6/9/06, Aahz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was also discussion of a change to the way quit works in
interactive mode.I see no record of it, so I guess that's not going in, either. It's already in 2.5a2, if I'm
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:28:47AM -0700, Aahz wrote:
Okay, I guess I mis-remembered what had been agreed to. Should this go
into What's New?
Already there:
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/other-lang.html#SECTION000131.
(Fred, is it possible to set the anchors used for
On Friday 09 June 2006 10:28, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Really? The old situation is really evil, and the new approach is at
least marginally better by giving users a way to migrate to a new
non-evil approach. What exactly is the backwards incompatibility you
speak of?
The incompatibility
I will be looking at the open AST issues today.
Jeremy
On 6/9/06, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most important outstanding issue is the xmlplus/xmlcore issue.
It's not going to get fixed unless someone works on it. There's only
a few days left before beta 1. Can someone please
19 matches
Mail list logo
