On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 10:32 AM Richard Hughes
wrote:
>
> Many thanks all; I've fixed up all the issues I think and submitted an actual
> review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167067
>
Reviewed. :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Many thanks all; I've fixed up all the issues I think and submitted an actual
review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167067
Richard.
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 31. 01. 23 13:12, Richard Hughes wrote:
Hey all,
I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the fwupd-efi
package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream maintainer, so
I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new release if there's
somethi
On 31. 01. 23 13:12, Richard Hughes wrote:
Hey all,
I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the fwupd-efi
package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream maintainer, so
I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new release if there's
somethi
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 1:12 PM Richard Hughes
wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the
> fwupd-efi package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream
> maintainer, so I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new
> rel
Hey all,
I'm building python-uswid as a rpm as it's going to be needed by the fwupd-efi
package at build time in the near future. I'm also the upstream maintainer, so
I'm not against changing upstream and then tagging a new release if there's
something that needs to be fixed to build a Fedora p
