On 01/23/2017 10:22 PM, João Matos wrote:
Hello,
I understand.
Python sources are very large. Any pointers to which file defines the
global statement syntax?
Consider joining the core-mentorship list for questions like these:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-mentorship
Anyway, Py
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 at 01:42 Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 01/23/2017 10:22 PM, João Matos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I understand.
> > Python sources are very large. Any pointers to which file defines the
> > global statement syntax?
>
> Consider joining the core-mentorship list for questions like th
I have been using pathlib, and I have come up with a few suggestions on
what would make the module more useful for me (and hopefully others):
First, for me, extensions are primarily useful as a single unit. So,
practically speaking, the extension of "spam.tar.gz" isn't ".gz", it is
".tar.gz". So
As another suggestion, I'd love an rmtree method analogous to shutil.rmtree.
And maybe also a remove method, that basically does:
if path.is_dir():
path.rmtree()
else:
path.unlink()
\--
Ryan (ライアン)
Yoko Shimomura > ryo (supercell/EGOIST) > Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Todd wrote:
> First, for me, extensions are primarily useful as a single unit. So,
> practically speaking, the extension of "spam.tar.gz" isn't ".gz", it is
> ".tar.gz". So it would be nice to have some properties to make it easier to
> deal with the "complete" e
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Todd wrote:
> > First, for me, extensions are primarily useful as a single unit. So,
> > practically speaking, the extension of "spam.tar.gz" isn't ".gz", it is
> > ".tar.gz". So it would be nice to have
(I have a small question, I hope it's not off-topic for this thread.)
What was the rationale behind an explicit `iterdir` method? Why not simply make
the `Path` objects iterable?
From: Python-ideas on
behalf of Todd
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:3
I'm just going to let fly with the +1s and -1s, don't take them too
seriously, they're basically impressionistic (I'm not a huge user of
pathlib yet).
Todd writes:
> So although the names are tentative, perhaps there could be a "fullsuffix"
> property to return the extensions as a single string
