On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 02:47:48PM -, Brian McCall wrote:
> Asked and answered!
>
> > * There are an unlimited number of derived (non-SI) and compound units
> > that people will want to use.
>
> Unlimited? You sure that problem can't be bounded?
Every problem can be bounded by the amount
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 02:31, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:29 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> > > another that's using nautical miles, but *not both in the same
>> > > module*?
>
>
> Absolutely!
>
> There is talk about "the Application" as though that's one thing, but Pyth
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:29 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
> > > another that's using nautical miles, but *not both in the same
> > > module*?
Absolutely!
There is talk about "the Application" as though that's one thing, but
Python applications these days can be quite large collections of third
part
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 00:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 02:17:00PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > Do you ever have one module that's using statute miles and
> > another that's using nautical miles, but *not both in the same
> > module*? The only reason to have them name
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 02:17:00PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Do you ever have one module that's using statute miles and
> another that's using nautical miles, but *not both in the same
> module*? The only reason to have them namespaced to modules is to
> allow different modules to use them in
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 22:56, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
>
> Hi. I've replied to the first e-mail on this thread, more than 10 days ago.
> I am back, though I've read most of what was written.
>
> I don't think things have improved, but you sure are consuming everyone's time
>
> You are still repeatin
Hi. I've replied to the first e-mail on this thread, more than 10 days ago.
I am back, though I've read most of what was written.
I don't think things have improved, but you sure are consuming everyone's
time
You are still repeating this:
"more in line with the expectation of the majority, "
Tho
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 13:09, Matt del Valle wrote:
>
> My personal preference for adding units to python would be to make instances
> of all numeric classes subscriptable, with the implementation being roughly
> equivalent to:
>
> def __getitem__(self, unit_cls: type[T]) -> T:
> return unit_
My personal preference for adding units to python would be to make
instances of all numeric classes subscriptable, with the implementation
being roughly equivalent to:
def __getitem__(self, unit_cls: type[T]) -> T:
return unit_cls(self)
We could then discuss the possibility of adding some im
On 8/04/22 7:03 pm, Christopher Barker wrote:
Are you SURE your accounting software is doing the right thing? ;-)
Well, I've only ever seen precision problems manifest themselves
once, and that was when I wrote a script that used repeated
multiplications by 10 as part of a process to convert a
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 12:22, Ricky Teachey wrote:
> I just get really excited at the idea of it being native to the language and
> am dreaming of being able to use it more often for my every day calculations.
> Right now I just don't feel confident I can.
If you can describe what the Python of
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 2:40 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> Brian McCall writes:
> Steven d'Aprano writes:
>
> > > you have shown nothing to justify why unit support must be built
> > > into the language itself.
> >
> > I did what I could, but I'm not going to try and justify any more.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 11:52:31AM -, malmiteria wrote:
> I believe my gobelin exemple is a fair case of MI since we can
> definitely say halfbreed *is a* corruptedgobelin *and a* proudgobelin.
That is the most common relationship modelled by inheritance.
> In such a case with multiple *i
On 7/04/22 11:11 pm, malmiteria wrote:
But if there was a way to tell super what class it should be a proxy of, that
would be very easy to explain : when there's two parent, just give the parent
you want to target as an argument to super.
That sounds like exactly what Class.method(self) does
On 7/04/22 11:52 pm, malmiteria wrote:
I believe my gobelin exemple is a fair case of MI since we can definitely say
halfbreed *is a* corruptedgobelin *and a* proudgobelin.
I'm not so sure about that. I would agree that it's a gobelin, just as
you are (presumably) a human.
But a child is *not
If these examples were possible (I wouldn't say they are smart designs)
they would lead to recursion errors.
Limitations on MRO are good, they force to keep a quite simple structure.
Le jeu. 7 avr. 2022 à 17:41, malmiteria a écrit :
> Antoine Rozo writes:
> > If the only feature you need from su
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 2:51 PM Greg Ewing
wrote:
> I don't think it's entirely about the display. It's also about
> things like sum([1/10] * 10) == 1 being False.
sure, but:
In [18]: sum([Decimal(1) / Decimal(3)] * 3) == Decimal(1)
Out[18]: False
Which is just as bad -- not as "confusing" to
17 matches
Mail list logo
