On 8/20/2018 3:19 AM, Simon De Greve wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm quite new working with asyncio and thus maybe missing some things
about it, but wouldn't it be quite easier to have some iterables to
support async for loops "natively", since asyncio is now part of the
Stdlib?
One purpose of a
Ok, as I thought I was missing something quite important in the process.
Thanks to everybody in here.
Le lun. 20 août 2018 à 15:53, Joao S. O. Bueno a
écrit :
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 04:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Simon De Greve
> wrote:
> > > Do you me
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 04:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Simon De Greve wrote:
> > Do you mean that for loops inside an "async def" statements are always
> > executed as 'async for' loops? That's what I wanted to acheive by writing
> > the AsyncDict class (c.f. the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Simon De Greve wrote:
> Do you mean that for loops inside an "async def" statements are always
> executed as 'async for' loops? That's what I wanted to acheive by writing
> the AsyncDict class (c.f. the CodeReview link).
The point of an 'async for' loop is that gr
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Simon De Greve wrote:
> Do you mean that for loops inside an "async def" statements are always
> executed as 'async for' loops? That's what I wanted to acheive by writing
> the AsyncDict class (c.f. the CodeReview link).
The only difference between an 'async for'
Do you mean that for loops inside an "async def" statements are always
executed as 'async for' loops? That's what I wanted to acheive by writing
the AsyncDict class (c.f. the CodeReview link).
As I said, I'm pretty new to Asyncio and thus may be missing some
immportant feature of the lib (which is
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:19 AM, Simon De Greve wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm quite new working with asyncio and thus maybe missing some things about
> it, but wouldn't it be quite easier to have some iterables to support async
> for loops "natively", since asyncio is now part of the Stdlib?
>
Hello everyone,
I'm quite new working with asyncio and thus maybe missing some things about
it, but wouldn't it be quite easier to have some iterables to support async
for loops "natively", since asyncio is now part of the Stdlib?
I've tried to work with asyncio while using discord.py, and has so
