On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 4:47 AM Rhodri James wrote:
> Sorry, but that's true of any conversation. If you want information out
> of a thread, you are going to have to put in the work of reading and
> comprehending it. The only way around that is to get a technical PA to
> read and comprehend it
On 12/04/2019 04:44 AM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
An advantage. If the topic goes round several times, the mods closing the topic
freezes the thread so that the thread does not gets filled with unnecessary
details.
By the time the topic has gone around several times, it is already
On 04/12/2019 12:44, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, 15:16 Rhodri James, wrote:
Which is a problem because...?
--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
An advantage. If the
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, 15:16 Rhodri James, wrote:
>
> Which is a problem because...?
>
> --
> Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
>
An advantage. If the topic goes round several times, the mods closing
On 04/12/2019 03:50, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, 07:38 Steven D'Aprano, wrote:
What problem are you trying to solve? Are we suffering under a burden of
pople
On Dec 3, 2019, at 19:39, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> I wish people *would* resurrect old threads, rather than just start a
> new thread covering the same old ground. At least that way there is a
> chance that they may have read the previous correspondence.
I agree. And if it were a lot easier
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, 07:38 Steven D'Aprano, wrote:
> What problem are you trying to solve? Are we suffering under a burden of
> pople resurrecting old threads from ten years ago, or even a year
Hi Abdur-Rahmaan,
On 4/12/19 8:14 am, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
I suggest we find a way to close a mail thread. Obviously we can't
stop people from sending mails, but, like when a mod sees the topic
has been juiced out, he closes the topic which practically means:
if mailman sees
On Dec 3, 2019, at 11:17, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
>
> I suggest we find a way to close a mail thread. Obviously we can't stop
> people from sending mails, but, like when a mod sees the topic has been
> juiced out, he closes the topic
This does already happen, if only by human
https://discuss.python.org is an instance of Discourse, which, like
mailman, is also open source.
https://github.com/discourse/discourse
https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-moderation-guide/63116
https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman
I agree that
Broken thread reply chains would be the likely
Ok posted it with the idea than mailman operated on python and the mods
were hackers enough to add functionalities.
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
___
Python-ideas mailing list --
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 19:52, Richard Damon wrote:
>
> Mailman, the manager for the mailing list doesn’t offer any such option. The
> closest that could be done is if a topic just goes on too long, a filter
> could be added to the list configuration which holds for moderation messages
> which
Mailman, the manager for the mailing list doesn’t offer any such option. The
closest that could be done is if a topic just goes on too long, a filter could
be added to the list configuration which holds for moderation messages which
match the subject. The problem is that if someone changes the
13 matches
Mail list logo
