Dear all,
Just one more thing i want to ask that suppose i have a file like:---
47 8 ALA H H 7.85 0.02 1
48 8 ALA HAH 2.98 0.02 1
49 8 ALA HBH 1.05 0.02 1
50 8 ALA C C179.39 0.3
On Jul 14, 1:47�pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Mensanator mensana...@aol.com writes:
- unlimited precision integers
- easy to program
- IDE not required
- reasonable speed
- math library needs to include number theoretic functions
� like GCD, LCM, Modular Inverse,
On Jul 14, 4:58�pm, Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:08 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
- unlimited precision integers
- easy to program
- IDE not required
- reasonable speed
- math library needs to include number theoretic functions
� like GCD, LCM, Modular
Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net wrote:
Here's a related issue: I would like to see an option for type checking on
operands of logical operators, so that attempting to apply a logical
operator to non-Boolean entities generates a warning message. With operand
type checking, 'xor' and
amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
I tried but its not coming.
How much are you prepared to pay for help with this? Or are you just
asking us to do all the work for you?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jul 15, 4:50 pm, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
I tried but its not coming.
How much are you prepared to pay for help with this? Or are you just
asking us to do all the work for you?
Or to be a _little_ less blunt: if you want people here to _assist_
you
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:13 PM, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
Just one more thing i want to ask that suppose i have a file like:---
47 8 ALA H H 7.85 0.02 1
48 8 ALA HA H 2.98 0.02 1
49 8 ALA HB H
On Jul 15, 11:13 am, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
Just one more thing i want to ask that suppose i have a file like:---
47 8 ALA H H 7.85 0.02 1
48 8 ALA HA H 2.98 0.02 1
49 8 ALA HB H 1.05 0.02
Douglas Alan darkwate...@gmail.com (DA) wrote:
DA I wrote:
On Jul 14, 8:10 am, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
Of course you can take any BST algorithm and replace pointers by indices
in the array and allocate new elements in the array. But then you need
array elements to contain
On Jul 15, 5:07 am, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
I appreciate the effort that people have made, but I'm not impressed with any
of the answers. For one thing, xor should be able to accept an arbitrary
number of input arguments (not just two), and should return True if and
On Jul 15, 11:56 am, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 4:50 pm, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
I tried but its not coming.
How much are you prepared to pay for help with this? Or are you just
asking us to do all the work for you?
Or to be a
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) (A) wrote:
A In article m27hybyo95@cs.uu.nl, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl
wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) (A) wrote:
A In article m24otg3hkk@cs.uu.nl, Piet van Oostrum
A p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
And to get c.x = 4 working you also need a __setitem__.
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 23:03 +0530, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
Can anyone tell me that suppose i have a file having content like:
_Atom_name
_Atom_type
_Chem_shift_value
_Chem_shift_value_error
_Chem_shift_ambiguity_code
1 1 PHE
2009/7/15 Scott David Daniels scott.dani...@acm.org:
Aahz wrote:
In article 4a5ccdd6$0$32679$9b4e6...@newsspool2.arcor-online.net,
Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Deep_Feelings wrote:
So you have chosen programming language x so shall you tell us why
you did so , and what
Hi Newsgroup,
I'm new to python and I am familiarizing myself with threads (haven't done any
threading in any
other language before...). I was playing around and discovered some weird
behavior. Here is my code:
import threading
from time import sleep
from random import random
import sys
class
If I have to write an extension module with many objects, how can I
organizing the code?
I think: every object in a separate file, and a last file with the
PyInit_. function. But is unmenageable .
Solutions?
Thanks!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
and returns the last object that is true
A little suspect this.
_and_ returns the first object that is not true, or the last object.
or returns the first object that is true
Similarly:
_or_ returns the first object that is true, or the
On Jul 14, 6:34 pm, Rick Lawson lawso...@gmail.com wrote:
Appreciate any help on this. I am porting an app from Java to python
and need generic object pooling with hooks for object initialization /
cleanup and be able to specify an object timeout.
Are you looking for something like a thread
On Jul 15, 5:44 pm, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 5:07 am, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
[snip]
for arg in args:
if bool(arg): result= not result
It's more idiomatic to say if arg: ... rather than if bool
(arg):
Ah yes, but not
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:53:33 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:14 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:30:48 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
Seriously, do you *ever* take more than 2 seconds to consider whether
you might be missing something
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Mohan Parthasarathy surut...@gmail.comwrote:
So, all four of them above has its use cases in practice i guess.
thanks
mohan
As a hopefully semi-informative aside, I've been writing python code for a
few years now, and I regularly use all four forms of
On Jul 14, 4:48 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
A whole family of supers. :)
You should pick up Lisp. The whole concept of a binary operator
doesn't exist over there. All the things binary operators can do, Lisp
does with 0, 1, 2, or more arguments.
[1] (+)
0
[2] (+ 1)
1
[3] (+ 1
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:25:08 -0700, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice
to have an 'xor' operator as well.
I've often wished there was too, for the sake of completeness and
aesthetics, I'd love to be able to write:
a xor b
On Jul 15, 12:08 am, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
It works even for multiple tests (super xor):
if bool(a) + bool(b) + bool(c) +
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 02:02 -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
On Jul 14, 4:48 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
A whole family of supers. :)
All the things binary operators can do, Lisp
does with 0, 1, 2, or more arguments.
+1
n-ary operators are great, but binary operators are
tuxagb:
If I have to write an extension module with many objects, how can I
organizing the code?
I think: every object in a separate file, and a last file with the
PyInit_. function. But is unmenageable .
Solutions?
What do you think about using Cython?
Bye,
bearophile
--
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:25:08 -0700, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice
to have an 'xor' operator as well.
I've often wished there was too, for the sake of completeness and
aesthetics, I'd love to be
Hi,
I have a lot of old Dbase files (.dbf) and I'll like to convert these
to SQLite databases as automatically as possible.
Does anybody know a tool/Python script to do so?
I know, I could use dbfpy and create the SQLite table and import all
data. But is there something easier?
Many thanks for
On Jul 14, 2:21 pm, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:22 pm, hartley hartle...@gmail.com wrote: I'm very new at
wrapping Python/C, and I have run into some problems.
[snip]
pValue = PyObject_CallObject(pFunc,NULL);
pValue is now a PyList - i've even
On 14 juil, 19:33, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
Can anyone tell me that suppose i have a file having content like:
_Atom_name
_Atom_type
_Chem_shift_value
_Chem_shift_value_error
_Chem_shift_ambiguity_code
1 1 PHE H H
Howdy all,
A common idiom I use is::
def frobnicate(warble):
foo = complex_computation()
bar = long.access.path.leading.to.useful.value
baz = (lengthy + expression * with_several_parts)
spangulate(%(warble)s: %(foo)s%(bar)s [%(baz)d] % vars())
This allows the
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:53:28 +0200, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a lot of old Dbase files (.dbf) and I'll like to convert these
to SQLite databases as automatically as possible.
Does anybody know a tool/Python script to do so?
I know, I could use dbfpy
Andreas Grommek a...@mozarellasalat.homelinux.net (AG) wrote:
AG Hi Newsgroup,
AG I'm new to python and I am familiarizing myself with threads
AG (haven't done any threading in any other language before...). I was
AG playing around and discovered some weird behavior. Here is my code:
When you
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 08:08:13PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
def frobnicate(warble):
foo = complex_computation()
bar = long.access.path.leading.to.useful.value
baz = (lengthy + expression * with_several_parts)
spangulate(%(warble)s: %(foo)s%(bar)s
Sure, Aho-Corasick is fast for fixed strings; but without real
numbers / a concrete goal
Matt, how many words are you looking for, in how long a string ?
a simple solution is good enough, satisficing. Matt asked how to
make that function look nicer?
but nice has many dimensions -- bicycles are
2009/7/15 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com:
As a hopefully semi-informative aside, I've been writing python code for a
few years now, and I regularly use all four forms of argument passing listed
above.
Curiously, I never use the all-named style in Python, whereas it's my
normal style
Hi all,
I need to extend and not replace the __getitem__ method of a dict class.
Here is sample the code:
class myDict(dict):
... def __getitem__(self, y):
... print(Doing something)
... dict.__getitem__(self, y)
...
a=myDict()
a[value] = 1
print a[value]
None
As you
Nicolas Chauvat nicolas.chau...@logilab.fr writes:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 08:08:13PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
That is, pylint is not aware that the names used by accessing the values
from the dictionary returned by ‘vars()’.
...
You are not the only one:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:39:48PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
Here is the ticket:
https://www.logilab.net/elo/ticket/9634
Apologies: http://www.logilab.org/ticket/9634
--
Nicolas Chauvat
logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances
--
fdb wrote:
Hi all,
I need to extend and not replace the __getitem__ method of a dict class.
Here is sample the code:
class myDict(dict):
def __getitem__(self, y):
print(Doing something)
dict.__getitem__(self, y)
a=myDict()
a[value] = 1
print
pdpi wrote:
On Jul 15, 12:08 am, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
It works even for multiple tests (super xor):
if bool(a) + bool(b) +
Yes, that is what I was looking for.
Greets!!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-set-timeout-while-colling-a-soap-method--tp24461403p24496577.html
Sent from the Python - python-list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
On Jul 15, 4:53 am, Jonathan Gardner jgard...@jonathangardner.net
wrote:
On Jul 14, 6:34 pm, Rick Lawson lawso...@gmail.com wrote:
Appreciate any help on this. I am porting an app from Java to python
and need generic object pooling with hooks for object initialization /
cleanup and be able
Only this! I'm going crazy!
Than you!
Code:
class myDict(dict):
def __getitem__(self, y):
print(Doing something)
return dict.__getitem__(self, y)
a=myDict()
a[value] = 1
print a[value]
Christian Heimes ha scritto:
How about returning the value? :]
--
FabioBD
--
I'm looking for objective oriented and pythonic way to solve my problem.
I'm using IDLE's TreeWidget, by inheriting TreeItem and overriding some of
it's methods. My tree structure is defined inside treedata, which is
xml.dom.minidom object. MenuTreeFrame is responsible for displaying the
On Jul 15, 7:54 pm, hartley hartle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:21 pm, John Machin sjmac...@lexicon.net wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:22 pm, hartley hartle...@gmail.com wrote: I'm very new
at wrapping Python/C, and I have run into some problems.
[snip]
/* the first telling */
statement
Rick Lawson wrote:
On Jul 15, 4:53 am, Jonathan Gardner jgard...@jonathangardner.net
wrote:
On Jul 14, 6:34 pm, Rick Lawson lawso...@gmail.com wrote:
Appreciate any help on this. I am porting an app from Java to python
and need generic object pooling with hooks for object initialization /
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Tim Rowe digi...@gmail.com wrote:
Curiously, I never use the all-named style in Python, whereas it's my
normal style in Ada. I shall now enter a period of self-refelection to
try to work out why I am so inconsistent :-)
I use it for functions that only (or
In article m2vdluxt0j@cs.uu.nl, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) (A) wrote:
A In article m27hybyo95@cs.uu.nl, Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl
wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) (A) wrote:
A In article m24otg3hkk@cs.uu.nl, Piet van Oostrum
A
On Jul 15, 12:37 pm, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
pdpi wrote:
On Jul 15, 12:08 am, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
It
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Rick Lawson wrote:
On Jul 15, 4:53 am, Jonathan Gardner jgard...@jonathangardner.net
wrote:
On Jul 14, 6:34 pm, Rick Lawson lawso...@gmail.com wrote:
Appreciate any help on this. I am porting an app from Java to python
and need generic object pooling with hooks
Nicolas Here is the ticket:
Nicolas https://www.logilab.net/elo/ticket/9634
Is it possible to get read-only access to the tracker? It's prompting me
for a login which I don't have.
Thx,
--
Skip Montanaro - s...@pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/
when i wake up with a heart
Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl (PvO) wrote:
PvO def run(self):
PvO with lock:
All the 'with lock:' lines should have been 'with self.lock:' but as
lock is also a global variable, it did work. Of course you can decide to
use only the global variable and get rid of the self.lock
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 09:22:11AM -0500, s...@pobox.com wrote:
Nicolas Here is the ticket:
Nicolas https://www.logilab.net/elo/ticket/9634
Is it possible to get read-only access to the tracker? It's prompting me
for a login which I don't have.
Thx,
that should be
MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote in message
news:mailman.3158.1247667680.8015.python-l...@python.org...
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:25:08 -0700, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice
to have an 'xor'
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Peter Fodrekpeter.fod...@stuba.sk wrote:
Would anyone be helpful for me to get more information about this problem
because pydb does not show anything usable for me,please?
What is the directory structure for the HeeksCNC module? Although I'm
no expert, I
John Nagle wrote:
walterbyrd wrote:
I believe Guido himself has said that all indentions should be four
spaces - no tabs.
Since backward compatibility is being thrown away anyway, why not
enforce the four space rule?
At least that way, when I get python code from somebody else, I would
know
Nobody wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:23:54 +, garabik-news-2005-05 wrote:
I would like to learn a way of changing the colour of a particular
part of the output text. I've tried the following
On Unix operating systems this would be done through the curses interface:
Christian Heimes wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
It works even for multiple tests (super xor):
if bool(a) + bool(b) + bool(c) + bool(d) != 1:
raise
On Jul 13, 6:26 am, seldan24 selda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm fairly new at Python so hopefully this question won't be too
awful. I am writing some code that will FTP to a host, and want to
catch any exception that may occur, take that and print it out
(eventually put it into a log file
JM By the way why would you prevent us from using tabs for indenting ?
JM If I'm not wrong, from a semantic point of view, that's what tabs
JM are for: indenting. Spaces are meant to separate tokens, aren't they
JM ? I love my tabs, don't take them away from me !
I don't think
On 2009-07-15 10:15, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Christian Heimes wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
It works even for multiple tests (super xor):
if bool(a) + bool(b) + bool(c) +
Peter Fodrek wrote:
Dear conference!
I have test Why python based script for HeeksCNC post-processing does not
work... And I've got unbelievable behavior When importing module module
manually it works, but same opertaion from script does not
work as seen
/opt/HeeksCAD8/HeeksCNC
QOTW: Everyone gets so caught up in programming via languages that you get,
well, people trying to teach 'Computer Programming' as if it were only
necessary to grok a language, rather than grokking /symbol manipulation/
itself. - Simon Forman
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I have a lot of old Dbase files (.dbf) and I'll like to convert these
to SQLite databases as automatically as possible.
Does anybody know a tool/Python script to do so?
I know, I could use dbfpy and create the SQLite table and import all
data. But is there something
On Jul 15, 8:39 pm, David Lyon david.l...@preisshare.net wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:53:28 +0200, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a lot of old Dbase files (.dbf) and I'll like to convert these
to SQLite databases as automatically as possible.
Does
Hello,
I have a shell script, that I'm attempting to convert to Python. It
FTP's files down from an AS/400 machine. That part is working fine.
Once the files arrive, the script converts them from EBCDIC to ASCII
and then formats their line width based on a pre-determined size.
For example, if
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:10:32 +0100, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Can i become more precise like instead of printing all lines for PHE and
ASP is it possible that for PHE python will print only those lines which
will have information about H and HA and for ASP it will print those
lines
John Machin wrote:
If dbfpy can't handle any new-fangled stuff you may have in your
files, drop me a line ... I have a soon-to-be released DBF module that
should be able to read the new stuff up to dBase7 and VFP9,
including memo files, conversion from whatever to Unicode if
needed, ...
seldan24 wrote:
what can I use as the equivalent for the Unix 'fold' command?
def fold(s,len):
while s:
print s[:len]
s=s[len:]
s=A very long string indeed. Really that long? Indeed.
fold(s,10)
Output:
A very lon
g string i
ndeed. Rea
lly that l
ong? Indee
d.
Hi DaveA,
Thank for your responses even though my problem has been solved based on
Miles' suggestion. I am writing programs by using the SimPy library,
which is a discrete-event simulator library. Below is my actual code segment
class RAID(Process):
def ReqServ(self):
Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com writes:
While everyone's trying to tell the OP how to workaround the missing
xor operator, nobody answered the question why is there no [boolean]
xor operator ?.
Probably because there isn't one in C. The bitwise XOR operator, on the
other hand,
On Jul 15, 12:47 pm, Michiel Overtoom mot...@xs4all.nl wrote:
seldan24 wrote:
what can I use as the equivalent for the Unix 'fold' command?
def fold(s,len):
while s:
print s[:len]
s=s[len:]
s=A very long string indeed. Really that long? Indeed.
fold(s,10)
seldan24 wrote:
On Jul 15, 12:47 pm, Michiel Overtoom mot...@xs4all.nl wrote:
seldan24 wrote:
what can I use as the equivalent for the Unix 'fold' command?
def fold(s,len):
while s:
print s[:len]
s=s[len:]
s=A very long string indeed. Really that long? Indeed.
Hrvoje Niksic hnik...@xemacs.org writes:
While everyone's trying to tell the OP how to workaround the missing
xor operator, nobody answered the question why is there no [boolean]
xor operator ?.
Probably because there isn't one in C. The bitwise XOR operator, on the
other hand, exists
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:37:22 +0200, Christian Heimes
li...@cheimes.de wrote:
pdpi wrote:
On Jul 15, 12:08 am, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
I prefer something like:
bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
[snip]
Note that in Python A or B is in fact not equivalent to not(not A and
not B).
l = [(True, True), (True, False), (False, True), (False, False)]
for p in l:
... p[0] or p[1]
...
True
True
True
False
for p in l:
... not(not p[0] and not p[1])
...
True
True
On 7/15/2009 10:23 AM MRAB said...
On Jul 15, 12:47 pm, Michiel Overtoom mot...@xs4all.nl wrote:
seldan24 wrote:
what can I use as the equivalent for the Unix 'fold' command?
def fold(s,len):
while s:
print s[:len]
s=s[len:]
snip
You might still need to tweak the
On 7/15/2009 10:43 AM Jean-Michel Pichavant said...
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
[snip]
Note that in Python A or B is in fact not equivalent to not(not A and
not B).
l = [(True, True), (True, False), (False, True), (False, False)]
for p in l:
... p[0] or p[1]
...
True
True
True
False
for
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
[snip]
Note that in Python A or B is in fact not equivalent to not(not A and
not B).
l = [(True, True), (True, False), (False, True), (False, False)]
for p in l:
... p[0] or p[1]
[snip]
Did I make twice the
Hi all,
I came accross a strange behaviour in python today. Here is a simple
example to describe my situation:
MY_GLOBAL = ''
def a():
print 'global is: ', MY_GLOBAL
def b():
try:
MY_GLOBAL += 'bla'
except Exception, e:
print 'b: ', e
def c():
try:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
On 7/15/2009 10:43 AM Jean-Michel Pichavant said...
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
[snip]
Note that in Python A or B is in fact not equivalent to not(not A
and
not B).
Did I make twice the same obvious error ?
No -- but in the not(not...
On 7/15/2009 10:55 AM Rodrigue said...
I came accross a strange behaviour in python today. Here is a simple
example to describe my situation:
MY_GLOBAL = ''
snip
def e_raise():
if not MY_GLOBAL:
MY_GLOBAL = 'bla'
snip
Traceback (most recent call last):
File glo.py, line
Tim Golden wrote:
I was pondering on this yesterday, and the only case I've
come across in my code -- and it's reasonably common --
is checking that one and only one of two params has been
passed. I have code which wants, say, an id or a name
but doesn't want both. It's hardly difficult to
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Rodrigue wrote:
Basically, I was very surprised to discover that e() raises an
exception, but even more that e_raise() points to
if not MY_GLOBAL Is the problem not really when I assign?
My assumption is that some reordering is happening behind the scenes
that
I did initially ask for an infix xor operator, but eventually gave up on
this. I like the first of your two one-line solutions below; this is clean
and easy to understand. Thanks! I'd still like to be able to write an
expression like '(a and b) xor (c and d) xor (e and f)', but it looks as
On Jul 14, 2009, at 5:06 PM, David Bolen wrote:
Are you sure? It seems to restrict them in the same block, but not in
the entire file. At least I was able to use both space and tab
indented blocks in the same file with Python 3.0 and 3.1.
It seems to me that, within an indented block, Python
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:25 pm, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
have an 'xor' operator as well.
Hmm. I don't think 'nice' is
On Jul 9, 7:28 pm, Miles Kaufmann mile...@umich.edu wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Lie Ryan wrote:
Michael Mossey wrote:
I want to understand better what the secret is to responding to a
ctrl-C in any shape or form.
Are you asking: when would the python interpreter process
Dear all,
Sorry that I am disturbing you all again and again but this is the way I
am trying to solve my problem:---
import re
exp = re.compile(CA)
infile = open(file1.txt)
for line in infile:
... values = re.split(\s+, line)
... if exp.search(line):
...print (%s %s CA = %s
On 2009-07-15 13:29, Wayne Brehaut wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:25 pm, Dr. Phillip M. Feldmanpfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
have an 'xor' operator
On Jul 15, 7:29 pm, Wayne Brehaut wbreh...@mcsnet.ca wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd also guess that 'xor' would be much less used than 'and' or 'or',
but maybe that's just a reflection of the sort of code that I tend to
write.
On Jul 14, 2:25 pm, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
have an 'xor' operator as well.
My $0.02 on this discussion: There would be nothing gained by having
non-bitwise XOR operator. You can't
Miles Kaufmann wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
[snip]
Note that in Python A or B is in fact not equivalent to not(not A and
not B).
l = [(True, True), (True, False), (False, True), (False, False)]
for p in l:
... p[0] or p[1]
On 2009-07-15, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Sorry that I am disturbing you all again and again but this is the way I
am trying to solve my problem:---
We could probably be a lot more helpful if you would keep these
postings all in a single thread so that people who
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 00:16 +0530, amr...@iisermohali.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
Sorry that I am disturbing you all again and again but this is the way I
am trying to solve my problem:---
import re
exp = re.compile(CA)
infile = open(file1.txt)
for line in infile:
... values =
Mag Gam wrote:
At my university we are trying to compile python with --enable-shared
Is there a reason why you need to compile the CPython interpreter yourself?
however when I do a make many things fail. Is it a good idea to
compile python with shared libraries?
Perfectly fine, Linux
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 15, 7:29 pm, Wayne Brehaut wbreh...@mcsnet.ca wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd also guess that 'xor' would be much less used than 'and' or
I'm using multiprocessing to spawn several subprocesses, each of which
uses a very large data structure (making it impractical to pass it via
pipes / pickling). I need to allocate this structure once when the
process is created and have it remain in memory for the duration of
the process. The way
On Jun 26, 6:47 am, Mag Gam magaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thankyou everyone for the responses! I took some of your suggestions
and my loading sped up by 25%
what a useless post...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
