On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of course, allowed. But should
On 2015-07-19 20:01, Aron Barsam wrote:
i have trouble trying to play python please can you respond soon
You'll need to provide some details. Saying i have trouble isn't helpful.
Help us to help you.
Which operating system are you using? Windows, MacOS, Linux? Which
version?
Which version
On 7/18/2015 10:33 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/18/2015 8:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 00:36, Terry Reedy wrote:
Programmers don't much like doing maintainance work when they're paid to
do it, so why would
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:59:29 +1000, Steven D'Aprano writes:
Bug for bug compatible back to the 1970s, right? :-)
No, till the last posix in 1989 or so. Definitely not to the 1970s
as we want v7 c structs and x++ not the v6 ++x version.
:)
Laura
--
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24667
___
___
Python-bugs-list
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 4:18:31 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
And, despite Norway not being part of the EU, Scandinavia
is still in Europe.
This is a bit off topic: But i don't consider Scandinavia to
be a part of the EU. Not anymore than i would consider
America to be a part of the EU.
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:35:03 +0100, MRAB wrote:
rsplit - one line.
def lastWordFirst(s):
return .join(reversed(s.rsplit( , 1)))
--
Denis McMahon, denismfmcma...@gmail.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 20:11 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
Parameterized imports aren't possible, correct. What I'd look at
here is a more explicit instantiation. Something like:
import twitterDecebal
twitter = twitterDecebal.twitterDecebal(5, 60)
I worked with default values, because I
On 2015-07-19 01:59, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:35:10 +0200, Sibylle Koczian wrote:
Am 18.07.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Denis McMahon:
Having a list of words, get a copy of the list in reverse order. See
the reversed function (and maybe the list function).
That won't really
On 19/07/2015 17:24, MRAB wrote:
On 2015-07-19 17:13, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I've only seen one other application using HHMLL -- and that
was the
Amiga file system.
Okay, I'll bite. What does HHMLL stand
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Aron Barsam aronbar...@gmail.com wrote:
i have trouble trying to play python please can you respond soon
Play is an odd choice of verb. Are you under the impression that
Python is a game? Anyway, here's how to use Python:
1. Download Python from python.org.
2.
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 3:19:01 AM UTC-5, Skybuck Flying wrote:
14324
234545
345
534543
^ Looks less good though in non-fixed-sized font.
The obvious solution is to use a fixed width font. If you're
inserting syntactical noise simply to maintain readability
in variable width
On 2015-07-20 04:07, Chris Angelico wrote:
The int() and float() functions accept, if I'm not mistaken,
anything with Unicode category Nd (Number, decimal digit). In
your examples, the fraction (U+215B) is No, and the Roman numerals
(U+2168, U+2182) are Nl, so they're not supported. Adding
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:59:29 +1000, Steven D'Aprano writes:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 07:27 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
In the tiny corner of industrial automation where I do a lot of work,
nobody is using 3.0.
I should hope not, because 3.0 was rubbish and is unsupported :-)
I expect
New submission from LordBlick:
The use of methods path.chdir () corrupts the subsequent ability to detect the
file path which is interpreted.
I've made simple example, which is atached:
$ cd ~/tmp
$ ./test_os_path.py
abspath:~/tmp/test_os_path.py
weak abspath: ~/tmp/test_os_path.py
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of course, allowed. But should they be made, and if so, by who?
The people who want the fixes.
Babies
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Tim Chase
python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
Agreed that it's pretty awesome. It seems to have some holes though:
Python 3.4.2 (default, Oct 8 2014, 10:45:20)
[GCC 4.9.1] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
5c3812412b6f caused a refleak.
$ ./python -m test.regrtest -uall -R 3:3 test_set
[1/1] test_set
beginning 6 repetitions
123456
..
test_set leaked [23561, 24961, 23961] references, sum=72483
test_set leaked [785, 787, 787] memory blocks, sum=2359
1 test
Georg Brandl added the comment:
I don't recall the reason for this deliberate change (as seen from the docs
change).
I'm unable to come up with a good reason for this change now, but on the other
hand I can't come up with a good reason for code churn and adding deprecationg
warnings for a
On 2015-07-19 18:25, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 4:18:31 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
And, despite Norway not being part of the EU, Scandinavia
is still in Europe.
This is a bit off topic: But i don't consider Scandinavia to
be a part of the EU. Not anymore than i
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes:
I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop
patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the
environment that it runs
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 8:13:50 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 1:44:25 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it's simply that nobody can force volunteers to back
port something when they're just not interested in doing
the work, for whatever reason. Hence
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 8:29:06 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 2:02:12 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
Poor analogy. Babies need others to change their diapers
for them because they're not capable of doing it for
themselves.
Duh! That was the point of his analogy,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-puppeting
as well! You're a zero.
Rick, what the hell are you talking about? Mark is using the same email
address as
Martin Panter added the comment:
Nick seemed to approve of this, so perhaps it is ready to commit? The new patch
just resolves a minor conflict with the current code.
--
stage: patch review - commit review
versions: +Python 3.6
Added file:
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset acb5b177dd4e by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default':
Issue #24583: Fix refcount leak.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/acb5b177dd4e
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Martin Panter added the comment:
This patch defeats the warnings
--
status: closed - open
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39955/stat-times-deprecated.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15745
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Added comments on Rietveld.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4395
___
___
Python-bugs-list
On 07/19/2015 06:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 20/07/2015 00:23, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
No use replying anymore. You make a caricature of what I am saying and
put words in my mouth I never said. Just stay in your cosy ivory
tower. But please do not pretend that you are open for discussion,
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Added a patch to neaten it up a bit by naming the exit conditions and avoiding
the unnecessary extra incref/decref pair around the resize call.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39956/set_named_exits.diff
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 11:05:46 PM UTC-4, ryguy7272 wrote:
Hello experts. I odwnloaded Pandas, and put it here.
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2
Then, I ran this in what most people call the c-prompt, but I call it the
'Python 3.4.3 Shell'
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2 pip
On 07/19/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
def main():
name= input('Enter your full name: ')
split=name.split()
Full_name=split[2],split[0], split[1]
print(Full_name[2],',', Full_name[0], Full_name[1])
Hello experts. I odwnloaded Pandas, and put it here.
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2
Then, I ran this in what most people call the c-prompt, but I call it the
'Python 3.4.3 Shell'
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2 pip install 'setup.py'
It seems like everything ran fine, so I try this.
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
I was pinging Raymond. He is maintainer of the collections module, this issue
is assigned to his, and he had valid objections to previous version of the
patch. Even one of this reason is enough to wait his review before committing.
Thank you Raymond.
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
AFAIK 3.5+ (not tested).
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24583
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
This was turned into a doc issue, with no patch forthcoming, but Devin has
submitted a bugfix. Should this be turned back into a bug issue?
--
nosy: +terry.reedy
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 -Python 2.6, Python
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Added a variant patch that brings the steps together in a more logical manner
(single entry point at the top and the named exits at the bottom, brings
refcount adjustment logic together in a more coherent way). The restart
target is done the same way as
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-puppeting
as well! You're a zero.
Rick,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:20 am, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
I was most frustrated by the first case -- the patch was (informally)
rejected in favor of the right fix, and the right fix was
(informally) rejected because it
Changes by Alex Walters tritium-l...@sdamon.com:
--
nosy: +tritium
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23496
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Hi,
How we can send mail with attachment in Python? Is it any prerequisite for it?
Thanks,
Kevin Peterson
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:05 PM, ryguy7272 ryanshu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello experts. I odwnloaded Pandas, and put it here.
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2
Then, I ran this in what most people call the c-prompt, but I call it the
'Python 3.4.3 Shell'
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2 pip
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Marking as rejected by the module maintainer.
--
resolution: - rejected
stage: patch review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24656
Martin Panter added the comment:
Who are you pinging? I did just notice a minor English grammar problem (“one
arguments”). But as far as I am concered you could have already committed the
patch.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
I will look at this more when I get a chance (likely this week).
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22609
___
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
3.6 only. Correct?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24583
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/19/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
def main():
name= input('Enter your full name: ')
split=name.split()
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
It's very interesting that you ignore the two hardest parts of the process:
(1) Producing the patch in the first place.
(2) Convincing those with appropriate commit rights to accept the patch.
2 is often harder than 1. Or consider the case when you
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Kevin Peterson qh.res...@gmail.com wrote:
How we can send mail with attachment in Python? Is it any prerequisite for it?
You could use your favourite search engine to look this up. Or you
could poke around with the Python standard library and see if anything
On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of course, allowed. But should they be made, and if so, by
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24668
___
___
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
[Raymond]
I propose leaving this alone unless some actual harm can be shown.
+1.
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24668
On 19/07/2015 18:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 14:59 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
Reordering/interleaving your post to respond to different parts
together.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl wrote:
I am using
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:28:15 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 12:55:06 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
I don't think so, I know. If they want the patches that
badly and can't do it themselves they'll have to grin and
bear it, or do a bit of begging, or pay
101 - 156 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
