On Mar 5, 10:17 pm, Rob Clewley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a different and admittedly limited view of hybrid systems as
part of dynamical systems theory. In principle, I would love to have
time to write an interface to something like Modelica, but PyDSTool
isn't intended as an
On Mar 2, 12:07 pm, Rob Clewley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
Yes, that is a pretty fair description of our support for symbolics
using Python's own inheritance. Our ModelSpec classes provide only an
elementary form of inheritance, polymorphism and type checking. We
hope to expand our
This kind of comment comes up often, so I think it's worth spelling
out a response that will persist on the web and can appear in our FAQ.
I have a different and admittedly limited view of hybrid systems as
part of dynamical systems theory. In principle, I would love to have
time to write an
Mike,
Yes, that is a pretty fair description of our support for symbolics
using Python's own inheritance. Our ModelSpec classes provide only an
elementary form of inheritance, polymorphism and type checking. We
hope to expand our existing support for hybrid/DAE systems at the
level of our
On Feb 20, 4:16 pm, Stef Mientki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sounds GREAT !
thank you !
I just took a quick look,
the comparison to SimuLink looks good,
now if someone could make a comparison with Modelica;-)
cheers,
Stef Mientki
As far as I can tell, PyDSTool provides some basic symbolic
We are pleased to announce version 0.84 of PyDSTool, an open-source
dynamical systems simulation, modeling, and analysis package.
This long-overdue release is primarily intended to bring existing
PyDSTool functionality up to date with the latest numpy and scipy releases
(previous versions
Sounds GREAT !
thank you !
I just took a quick look,
the comparison to SimuLink looks good,
now if someone could make a comparison with Modelica ;-)
cheers,
Stef Mientki
Rob Clewley wrote:
We are pleased to announce version 0.84 of PyDSTool, an open-source
dynamical systems simulation,
