Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Has Wax exceeded the critical mass so that one can be quite certain
> that it will still be maintained, say, next year? (Sincere question
> since I don't know.)
I was a bit worried about this myself, but after browsing the source I
have to say I'm not terribly so anymor
Hallöchen!
"Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Ok, after brief eyeballing & experimenting, it appears that Wax
>> is just what I was looking for. The code is simple, concise and
>> trivially understandable, the level of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Fuzzyman wrote:
> >
> > > The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the
> > > parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating
> > > it yourself from scratch. :-)
> >
> > Sounds convincing, I'll giv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
>
> > The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the
> > parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating
> > it yourself from scratch. :-)
>
> Sounds convincing, I'll give it a shot after all.
Ok, after brief ey
On 16 Feb 2006 14:07:36 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snoe wrote:
>
> > Take a look at dabo, II think they're doing exactly what you're
> > describing.
> > http://blog.dabodev.com/
>
> Dabo appear to be doing way more than what I want, with database access
> etc.
That was m
Fuzzyman wrote:
> The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the
> parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating
> it yourself from scratch. :-)
Sounds convincing, I'll give it a shot after all.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > The web content is a bit sparse; fortunately the code has seen more
> > love than the web pages. Wax was the focus of a couple of Google
> > "Summer of Code" projects, and new life seems to have been gained as a
> > result.
>
> I'm glad to hear tha
snoe wrote:
> Take a look at dabo, II think they're doing exactly what you're
> describing.
> http://blog.dabodev.com/
Dabo appear to be doing way more than what I want, with database access
etc.
My ideal module, when implemented, would be extremely small as far as
the size of code goes. I'm usi
Ben Finney wrote:
> The web content is a bit sparse; fortunately the code has seen more
> love than the web pages. Wax was the focus of a couple of Google
> "Summer of Code" projects, and new life seems to have been gained as a
> result.
I'm glad to hear that, however, I just took a look at the m
As you just said, wxPython is "...(a simple wrapper for a C++
toolkit)": it is
oriented toward the C++ style/mindset.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I rarely do GUIs, and reminded myself today why that is the case
(simply, it's not fun).
I implemented a simple TreeCtrl, and had to implement my own 'children'
method, of all things!
Here it is:
def children(self,node):
c = []
nc,cookie = self.GetFirstChild(node)
whi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I rarely do GUIs, and reminded myself today why that is the case
> (simply, it's not fun).
>
> I implemented a simple TreeCtrl, and had to implement my own 'children'
> method, of all things!
>
> Here it is:
>
> def children(self,node):
> c = []
> nc,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I rarely do GUIs, and reminded myself today why that is the case
> (simply, it's not fun).
Programming C++ in Python isn't much fun, true.
> However, it should be pretty easy to write small wrapper over the
> wxPython api.
> [...]
> wxPython is gr
13 matches
Mail list logo
