Re: How may I learn Python Web Frameworks

The official Django docs is pretty detailed https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/ You could also look at the Django book but it confesses to being written for version 1.4 even though it goes ahead to assure us that it's not outdated https://django-book.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ -- https://mail.

Re: How may I learn Python Web Frameworks

you'll find a very extensive Flask tutorial at http://blog.miguelgrinberg.com/post/the-flask-mega-tutorial-part-i-hello-world . -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: How may I learn Python Web Frameworks

web2py http://www.web2py.com/ has extensive tutorials, videos, and a book. Laura -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

How may I learn Python Web Frameworks

Dear Group, I am slightly new in Python Web Frameworks. I could learn bit of Django, Flask and Bottle. But I am looking for a good web based tutorial like Python or NLTK. Somehow, I did not find documentations for web frameworks are very good, one has to do lot of experiments even to learn

Python Web Frameworks PEP8 Consistency

The code is read much more often than it is written. The PEP8 guidelines are intended to improve the readability of code. We will take a look at web frameworks source code readability (bottle, cherrypy, circuits, django, flask, pyramid, tornado, web.py, web2py and wheezy.web): http://mindref.

Re: How to select Python web frameworks and which one is the best framework ?

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:23 AM, VGNU Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:20 PM, VGNU Linux wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I am confused on which web framework to select for developing a small data >> driven web application. Application will have features generally found in >> now-a-days web ap

Re: How to select Python web frameworks and which one is the best framework ?

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:20 PM, VGNU Linux wrote: > Hi all, > > I am confused on which web framework to select for developing a small data > driven web application. Application will have features generally found in > now-a-days web application like security, database connectivity, > authenticati

How to select Python web frameworks and which one is the best framework ?

Hi all, I am confused on which web framework to select for developing a small data driven web application. Application will have features generally found in now-a-days web application like security, database connectivity, authentication etc. I found few web frameworks over the net like django, zop

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Gluon was made at my school? I seriously gotta start talking to the CTI department. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 29, 3:15 pm, Aaron Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 22, 11:22 pm, SamFeltus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > """Perhaps we need a pythonic FRONTEND. """ > > > Should have happened years ago. > > It did. Mark Hammond embedded Python under MSIE about > the same time javascript and

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 22, 11:22 pm, SamFeltus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > """Perhaps we need a pythonic FRONTEND. """ > > Should have happened years ago. It did. Mark Hammond embedded Python under MSIE about the same time javascript and java applets came along (94, maybe?) It didn't fly because of political an

Re: Python web frameworks

Op Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:29:38 -0800, schreef BartlebyScrivener: > I'm just learning Django and feeling my way through all of this server > terminology. Where does Django's memcached feature fit into all of this? > When you all speak of start up costs and memory intensive loading for > each requests

Re: Python web frameworks

I'm just learning Django and feeling my way through all of this server terminology. Where does Django's memcached feature fit into all of this? When you all speak of start up costs and memory intensive loading for each requests, doesn't the caching feature eliminate most of that overhead? http://w

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 10:27 pm, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeff wrote: > > On Nov 21, 6:25 am, Bruno Desthuilliers > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> joe jacob a écrit : > >> (snip) > > >>> Thanks everyone for the response. From the posts I understand that > >>> Django and pylons are the best.

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 23, 4:22 am, SamFeltus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > """Perhaps we need a pythonic FRONTEND. """ > > Should have happened years ago. Python Internet Environment: PIE. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 22, 11:00 am, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 12:15 am, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I would say that that is now debatable. Overall mod_wsgi is probably a > > better package in terms of what it has to offer. Only thing against > > mod_wsgi at thi

Re: Python web frameworks

"""Perhaps we need a pythonic FRONTEND. """ Should have happened years ago. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python web frameworks

Perhaps we need a pythonic FRONTEND. If you're meant to be able to run java code in a browser vm; and flash; and javascript...why not a reduced version of python? I'm thinking a sandboxed interpreter, perhaps based on EmbeddedPython, and a restricted set of classes; core logic, string and maths,

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 23, 4:00 am, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 12:15 am, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I would say that that is now debatable. Overall mod_wsgi is probably a > > better package in terms of what it has to offer. Only thing against > > mod_wsgi at this

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 7:55 am, "Joe Riopel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007 8:46 AM, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Django comes with its own little server so that you don't have > > to set up Apache on your desktop to play with it. > > Pylons too, it's good for development b

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 12:15 am, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would say that that is now debatable. Overall mod_wsgi is probably a > better package in terms of what it has to offer. Only thing against > mod_wsgi at this point is peoples willingness to accept something that > is new in conju

Re: Python web frameworks

Jeff wrote: > On Nov 21, 6:25 am, Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> joe jacob a écrit : >> (snip) >> >>> Thanks everyone for the response. From the posts I understand that >>> Django and pylons are the best. By searching the net earlier I got the >>> same information that Django is

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 4:42 am, joe jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Django is best among the frameworks so I > downloaded it and I found it very difficult to configure. I referred > the djangobook. It's not a turnkey type thing like WordPress or Joomla. It's a webframework. Also watch versions. The book ex

Re: Python web frameworks + adobe flex

I never used the Django AMF, I use JSON to go between Python and Flex. It works well, but lacks easy 2 way communication of course. Interfacing with Flex is a gaping hole in the Python libraries. Python needs a web framework that embraces Flex from the ground up, HTML being such a limited web disp

RE: Python web frameworks + adobe flex

slight shift of topic here. I'm a newbie at standard web stuff. Mostly java webstart and a little mod_python. I experimented with Adobe Flex and really loved it for doing the front end. The backend needs to provide xml, json or AMF (an adobe proprietary binary format). For prototyping, I was

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 2007 5:42 AM, joe jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the response. From the posts I understand that > Django and pylons are the best. By searching the net earlier I got the > same information that Django is best among the frameworks so I > downloaded it and I found it

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 6:25 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > joe jacob a écrit : > (snip) > > > Thanks everyone for the response. From the posts I understand that > > Django and pylons are the best. By searching the net earlier I got the > > same information that Django is best among the frameworks so I > > d

RE: Python web frameworks

-snip-- > > Thanks everyone for the response. From the posts I understand that > Django and pylons are the best. By searching the net earlier I got the > same information that Django is best among the frameworks so I > downloaded it and I found it very difficult to configure. I referred > the dja

Re: Python web frameworks

joe jacob a écrit : (snip) > Thanks everyone for the response. From the posts I understand that > Django and pylons are the best. By searching the net earlier I got the > same information that Django is best among the frameworks so I > downloaded it and I found it very difficult to configure. ???

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 10:15 am, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 1:37 pm, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 20, 3:39 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > This only holds if actually hosted on Apache. As Django these days > > > supports

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 1:37 pm, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 3:39 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This only holds if actually hosted on Apache. As Django these days > > supports WSGI interface there is nothing to stop it being run with > > other hosting solu

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 3:39 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This only holds if actually hosted on Apache. As Django these days > supports WSGI interface there is nothing to stop it being run with > other hosting solutions that support WSGI. So, you could host it under > paster or CherryPy WS

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 21, 2:33 am, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 9:42 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 12/7. Django comes with its own little server so that you don't have > > > to set up Apache on your desktop to play with it. > > > I was rather shocked to learn t

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 10:00 am, Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeff: > > > I don't know much about the others. Turbo gears uses Mochikit, which > > hasn't had a new stable release in some time. I prefer jQuery myself. > > You can use jQuery with TurboGears if you develop custom widgets (I do so)

Re: Python web frameworks

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, joe jacob wrote: > There are a lot of web frameworks for python like django, mod_python, > spyce, turbo gears, Zope, Cherrypy etc. Which one is the best in terms > of performance and ease of study. Personally I found zope/plone to be very much its own enormously complex world

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 9:42 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 12/7. Django comes with its own little server so that you don't have > > to set up Apache on your desktop to play with it. > > I was rather shocked to learn that django only has this tiny server and does > not come with a stand-a

Re: Python web frameworks

joe jacob a écrit : > There are a lot of web frameworks for python like django, mod_python, > spyce, turbo gears, Zope, Cherrypy etc. Which one is the best in terms > of performance and ease of study. As far as I'm concerned, the winners are Django and Pylons (my own preference going to Pylons).

Re: Python web frameworks

server and does > not come with a stand-alone server and is supposed to run as > mod_python/cgi-driven app through apache. The standalone server aspect of a large number of Python Web frameworks typically involves BaseHTTPServer from the standard library, as far as I've seen, excluding th

Re: Python web frameworks

Jeff: > I don't know much about the others. Turbo gears uses Mochikit, which > hasn't had a new stable release in some time. I prefer jQuery myself. You can use jQuery with TurboGears if you develop custom widgets (I do so). No problem here. -- Thomas Wittek Web: http://gedankenkonstrukt.de/ J

Re: Python web frameworks

> 12/7. Django comes with its own little server so that you don't have > to set up Apache on your desktop to play with it. I was rather shocked to learn that django only has this tiny server and does not come with a stand-alone server and is supposed to run as mod_python/cgi-driven app through ap

Re: Python web frameworks

On 20 nov, 07:19, joe jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a lot of web frameworks for python like django, mod_python, > spyce, turbo gears, Zope, Cherrypy etc. Which one is the best in terms > of performance and ease of study. I'm making web apps with CherryPy at work and it's quite good.

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 2007 8:46 AM, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Django comes with its own little server so that you don't have > to set up Apache on your desktop to play with it. Pylons too, it's good for development but using the bundled web server is not recommended for production. --

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 6:19 am, joe jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a lot of web frameworks for python like django, mod_python, > spyce, turbo gears, Zope, Cherrypy etc. Which one is the best in terms > of performance and ease of study. I'm looking at django mainly. I hope the veterans jump in wi

Re: Python web frameworks

On Nov 20, 2007 7:19 AM, joe jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a lot of web frameworks for python like django, mod_python, > spyce, turbo gears, Zope, Cherrypy etc. Which one is the best in terms > of performance and ease of study. I wouldn't classify mod_python as a web framework: "Mod

Re: Python web frameworks

The only one that I have used extensively is Django, which is very easy to use and quite powerful in the arena for which it was created. It has a powerful admin interface that automatically generates data entry forms for content producers and a decent template system. It has some definite drawback

Python web frameworks

There are a lot of web frameworks for python like django, mod_python, spyce, turbo gears, Zope, Cherrypy etc. Which one is the best in terms of performance and ease of study. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

johnbraduk a écrit : > Thomas, > Like many others I have been going round the same loop for months. > > I have struggled with most of the Python solutions, including > TurboGears and have given up and gone back to ColdFusion. I am not > trying to kick of a religious war about the pros and cons of

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Thomas, Like many others I have been going round the same loop for months. I have struggled with most of the Python solutions, including TurboGears and have given up and gone back to ColdFusion. I am not trying to kick of a religious war about the pros and cons of ColdFusion as a scripting langau

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

I have posted a new version of Gluon and some slides. I am hoping to have a draft manual soon. I believe I have fixed all of the issues that have been addressed but, if not, please let me know. Massimo Did you try gluon? http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples On Oct 13, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Kay Sch

Re: Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]

On Oct 14, 3:46 am, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we do agree entirely, it is just that the application we have > in > mind is more a collection of web services than a traditional Web > application. > Now, since you are here, there is an unrelated question that I want to >

Re: Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]

On Oct 14, 6:46 pm, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, since you are here, there is an unrelated question that I want to > ask you, concerning the future of Paste with respect to WSGI 2.0. > I do realize that at this stage WSGI 2.0, is only a draft Hmmm, not sure where people keep

Paste and WSGI 2.0 [WAS: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks]

On Oct 14, 2:52 am, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, going without a framework (which at least in his article is > what Michele seems to be comparing Pylons against) isn't always so > bad. I started writing an Atompub server in Pylons, but felt like I > was spending too much tim

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 6, 8:13 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > Well... Last year, I had a look at Pylons, then played a bit with wsgi > and building my own framework over it. I finally dropped that code and > went back to Pylons, which I felt could become far better than my own > efforts. Now since then I had wa

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 6, 8:29 am, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you (or something else) have something to say about Beaker? > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonde

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

> ... I almost forgot ... > > another difference between Gluon and Django,TG is that in Gluon if > you write controllers without view you automatically get generic view > that render and BEAUTIFY() the variables returned by the controllers. > That means you can develop the logic of your application

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

... I almost forgot ... another difference between Gluon and Django,TG is that in Gluon if you write controllers without view you automatically get generic view that render and BEAUTIFY() the variables returned by the controllers. That means you can develop the logic of your application with

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Hi Daniel, in many respects Gluon is similar to Django and was greatly inspired by Django. Some differences are: Gluon is easier to install - you never need to use the shell, there are no configuration files. Gluon is a web app. You can do all development via a web interface. You can compil

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

> Hello everybody, > > I just joined this mailing list. Thanks for your comments about gluon. > > I have posted a short video about it and I am planning to make more > over the week-end. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBjja6N6IYk > > About some of your comments: > - the most complex modules (li

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 13, 4:23 am, Massimo Di Pierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I just joined this mailing list. Thanks for your comments about gluon. > > I have posted a short video about it and I am planning to make more > over the week-end. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBjja6N6IYk

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 12, 10:23 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > P.S. Michele Simionato. I have heard your name before? Is it possible > we have met in Pisa in 1990-1996? I am also a Quantum Field Theorist > and there is not many of us. That is definitely possible, even if I don't remember yo

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > happy to hear that. > you may want take a loot at http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/vqcd > It is mostly python stuff and will post the code soon. Ah, memories :) I'm not working on QCD anymore, but I did write a bunch of code a while back to script Mayavi (the old one, not the

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

happy to hear that. you may want take a loot at http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/vqcd It is mostly python stuff and will post the code soon. Massimo On Oct 12, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Fernando Perez wrote: > Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > >> P.S. Michele Simionato. I have heard your name before? Is it possible

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > P.S. Michele Simionato. I have heard your name before? Is it possible > we have met in Pisa in 1990-1996? I am also a Quantum Field Theorist > and there is not many of us. More than you think, it seems. Some of us were even using python to process Lattice QCD computati

Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Hello everybody, I just joined this mailing list. Thanks for your comments about gluon. I have posted a short video about it and I am planning to make more over the week-end. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBjja6N6IYk About some of your comments: - the most complex modules (like html and sql

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 10, 8:15 pm, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kay Schluehr wrote: > >>http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples > > > The delivered sourcecode is syntactically broken. Tabs and whitespaces > > were mixed and when I open a file like gluon/global.py I find sections > > like this: > > > class

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Kay Schluehr wrote: >> http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples > > The delivered sourcecode is syntactically broken. Tabs and whitespaces > were mixed and when I open a file like gluon/global.py I find sections > like this: > > class Request(Storage): > """ > defines the request object and th

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 10, 5:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into > something new and different > > http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples The delivered sourcecode is syntactically broken. Tabs and whitespaces were mixed and when I open a file like gluon/glo

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 10, 5:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into > something new and different > > http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples Requiring Python 2.5 may not be a good idea for the time being. For instance, I am forced to use Python 2.4 because of

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 9, 11:57 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into > something new and different > > http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples This is actually a neat framework! I'm a somewhat of fan of web- frameworks and I used most major ones and I like to po

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Michele, > At work we are shopping for a Web framework, so I have been looking at > the available options on the current market. just because you were involved in creating an own version of Python does NOT free you from the social obligation to create your own Python web framework. So stop shoppi

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 10, 5:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into > something new and different > > http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples Well, the name is certainly appealing to an old gauge field theorist like myself ;) Michele Simionato -- http://ma

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into something new and different http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Michele Simionato wrote: > I wait with > impatience the time when Web programming will become a solved > problem with a standard built-in solution that works. That will probably come from Microsoft. At least for all-Microsoft environments. They're the only player who controls enough of the p

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 7, 6:14 pm, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 7, 12:24 pm, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Here we disagree: I think that a programmer should know what he > > is using. > > My point was that they should not *need* to know. Too much information > can be de

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 7, 12:24 pm, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here we disagree: I think that a programmer should know what he > is using. My point was that they should not *need* to know. Too much information can be detrimental. > > Where is the session data stored: in memory, files, databa

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 7, 11:31 am, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO this is not as much a framework comparison rather than an > evaluation of the individual components that make up Pylons. More in general let's say that I am interested in the evaluation of WSGI-compatible components. > The framewo

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

IMO this is not as much a framework comparison rather than an evaluation of the individual components that make up Pylons. The framework is the sum of all its parts. Programmers should not need to know that that a package named Beaker is used for sessions, Routes for url mapping, PasteDeploy for

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 7, 8:36 am, Bruno Desthuilliers > Indeed. But AFAICT, Lawrence and Michele problems is not to port an > existing web application, but to choose a web framework that will play > well with their existing *system* (RDBMS, existing apps and libs etc). > Which is quite another problem, and may el

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Steve Holden a écrit : > Lawrence Oluyede wrote: (snip) >> We (Michele, myself and our colleagues) have a series of stuff we need >> to stick to so the choosing of a web framework ain't that easy. Most of >> the frameworks are a vision of the author of how to do things from >> scratch but a framewo

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Lawrence Oluyede wrote: > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What is good, since a lot of good things from Pylons will work with TG and a >> lot of good TG things will remain (and possibly be compatible with Pylons). >> If you take a better look at "the next version", you'll also see that th

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

But the question is when will the cheap hosting company's start to host normal python files! On 10/7/07, genro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 7, 8:35 am, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers > > > > > Michele Simionato a écrit : > > > >

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 7, 8:35 am, Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers > > > Michele Simionato a écrit : > > > > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have > > > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a > > > production-level WSGI sessi

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers > Michele Simionato a écrit : > > > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have > > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a > > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the > > players are (for instance how Beaker

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Michele Simionato a écrit : > On Oct 6, 9:13 am, Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - talking about routes, you say: >> >> """ >> I have no Ruby On Rails background, so I don't see the advantages of routes. >> """ >> >> I don't have any RoR neither, but as far as I'm concerned, one o

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

> I really, really like Django (and its community and the competence of > the developers) and I think it deserves what it has gained and more but > we are not here to decide who's the best (there's always no best). +1 QOTW -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any respectable comparison of Python web frameworks should > include evaluation of at least Django and TG. Or at least give > good reason why the comparison excludes them. I think you didn't read the foreword of the comparison. T

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is good, since a lot of good things from Pylons will work with TG and a > lot of good TG things will remain (and possibly be compatible with Pylons). > If you take a better look at "the next version", you'll also see that the > major concern was with WS

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 6, 9:13 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > - talking about routes, you say: > > """ > I have no Ruby On Rails background, so I don't see the advantages of routes. > """ > > I don't have any RoR neither, but as far as I'm concerned, one of the > big points with routes is url_for(), that avoids

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Michele Simionato a écrit : > At work we are shopping for a Web framework, so I have been looking at > the available options > on the current market. In particular I have looked at Paste and Pylons > and I have written my > impressions here: > > http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/python/yet-anot

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

On Oct 6, 7:15 am, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Chase wrote: > > Any respectable comparison of Python web frameworks should > > include evaluation of at least Django and TG. Or at least give > > good reason why the comparison excludes them. Mine is n

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Lawrence Oluyede wrote: > Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At least, you missed Turbo Gears :) >> http://turbogears.org/ >> For me, it feels more integrated than Pylons. > > Yeah, so integrated that the next version will be based upon Pylons ;-) ? What is good, since a lot of good thi

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Tim Chase wrote: > Any respectable comparison of Python web frameworks should > include evaluation of at least Django and TG. Or at least give > good reason why the comparison excludes them. When he said that he didn't want anything complex neither anything that used a templa

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

e than a mention as well. Any respectable comparison of Python web frameworks should include evaluation of at least Django and TG. Or at least give good reason why the comparison excludes them. Zope is also missing, but I'm not sure Zope qualifies so much as a framework, but as an answer to

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At least, you missed Turbo Gears :) > http://turbogears.org/ > For me, it feels more integrated than Pylons. Yeah, so integrated that the next version will be based upon Pylons ;-) ? -- Lawrence, oluyede.org - neropercaso.it "It is difficult to get a ma

Re: Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Michele Simionato: > At work we are shopping for a Web framework, so I have been looking at > the available options > on the current market. At least, you missed Turbo Gears :) http://turbogears.org/ For me, it feels more integrated than Pylons. -- Thomas Wittek Web: http://gedankenkonstrukt.de/

Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

At work we are shopping for a Web framework, so I have been looking at the available options on the current market. In particular I have looked at Paste and Pylons and I have written my impressions here: http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/python/yet-another-comparison-of-web-frameworks.html I d

Re: Python Web Frameworks

Shortash wrote: > Hi Gurus, > > I want to build a Python web app but im not sure which one to go for. I > prefer something like asp.Net , which would allow me to fully seperate > the presentation layer from the logic. Please advise? > > thanks, > > "Shortash' > Hi, Look at

Re: Python Web Frameworks

Shortash a écrit : > Hi Gurus, > > I want to build a Python web app but im not sure which one to go for. I > prefer something like asp.Net , which would allow me to fully seperate > the presentation layer from the logic. Please advise? Django, Turbogears, Pylons(HQ), web.py, etc, etc, etc... Wel

Re: Python Web Frameworks

Shortash, "S" == Shortash wrote: S> I want to build a Python web app but im not sure which one to go for. I S> prefer something like asp.Net , which would allow me to fully seperate S> the presentation layer from the logic. Please advise? Django? http://www.djangoproject.com -- Andrey V K

Re: Python Web Frameworks

Shortash wrote: > Python Web Frameworks weak google skills you have, young friend. http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

  1   2   >