On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 6:03:23 PM UTC-6, joshj...@gmail.com wrote:
> for importing obfuscate do we just type in import obfuscate
> or import obfuscate 0.2.2
Oh boy. I had forgotten about this little community "gem"
dating back to 2010. And unfortunately for comrade Steven,
there is no
for importing obfuscate do we just type in import obfuscate or import obfuscate
0.2.2
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not be
used where high security is required.
Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for high
security. Use at least double-rot13 instead, or
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not
be used where high security is required.
Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not
be used where
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:00:50 +, geremy condra wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is
In article mailman.1734.1270954853.23598.python-l...@python.org,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:00:50 +, geremy condra wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Aahz a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
In article mailman.1734.1270954853.23598.python-l...@python.org,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17
On 11/02/2010 11:32, Paul Rubin wrote:
Gregory Ewinggreg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that the Germans
made some blunders in the way they used the Enigma that seriously
compromised its security. There was reportedly a branch of the German
in 16 20100212 034121 Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer
That was almost at the end of the war though.
Colossus was working by the end of 1943 - the year that the Americans first
dropped
bombs on Germany ;-)
--
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
The predecessor of the Enigma was cracked by Polish scientists years
before WW2 started
I believe that all of Enigma was eventually cracked cos of two major
flaws.
I think it never would have been cracked if it hadn't been cracked
(whether by
Bob Martin wrote:
in 16 20100212 034121 Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer
That was almost at the end of the war though.
Colossus was working by the end of 1943 - the year that the Americans first
dropped
bombs on
in 144460 20100212 103319 Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Bob Martin wrote:
in 16 20100212 034121 Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer
That was almost at the end of the war though.
Colossus was working by the
Paul Rubin wrote:
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
The predecessor of the Enigma was cracked by Polish scientists years
before WW2 started
I believe that all of Enigma was eventually cracked cos of two major
flaws.
I think it never would have been cracked if it hadn't been
Gregory Ewing wrote:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that
the Germans made some blunders in the way they used the
Enigma that seriously compromised its security. There
was reportedly a branch of the German forces that used
their Enigmas differently, avoiding those mistakes,
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
It also turned out that everybody mostly writes his/her
own obfuscation routine.
Hey, it gives you the additional advantage of obfuscation
by obscurity!
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that the Germans
made some blunders in the way they used the Enigma that seriously
compromised its security. There was reportedly a branch of the German
forces that used their Enigmas
Christian Heimes wrote:
Gregory Ewing wrote:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that the Germans
made some blunders in the way they used the Enigma that seriously
compromised its security. There was reportedly a branch of the
German forces that used their Enigmas differently,
Paul Rubin wrote:
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that the Germans
made some blunders in the way they used the Enigma that seriously
compromised its security. There was reportedly a branch of the German
forces that used their
Paul Rubin wrote:
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that the Germans
made some blunders in the way they used the Enigma that seriously
compromised its security. There was reportedly a branch of the German
forces that used their
Christian Heimes wrote:
Gregory Ewing wrote:
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the fact that
the Germans made some blunders in the way they used the
Enigma that seriously compromised its security. There
was reportedly a branch of the German forces that used
their Enigmas differently,
All algorithms in obfuscate are obsolete, insecure and only
interesting for people *that* want to get well educated in the history
of encryption.
Not true. Another use case is suggested by the chosen name for the
library: to obfuscate text against casual human reading, while not
making it
On 10 February 2010 01:24, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
The classic example is rot-13 encryption of text in internet messages;
it would be a failure of imagination to suggest there are not other,
similar use cases.
That's built-in:
Hello World!.encode('rot-13')
'Uryyb Jbeyq!'
On 10/02/2010 11:23, Simon Brunning wrote:
Hello World!.encode('rot-13')
Not any more!
dump
Python 3.1.1 (r311:74483, Aug 17 2009,
win32
Type help, copyright, credits or
Hello World!.encode('rot-13')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
LookupError: unknown
Christian Heimes wrote:
A much, much stronger version of the
principles behind Vigenère was used in the German Enigma machine.
Because the algorithm was still not good enought some clever guy called
Turing and his team was able to crack the enigma.
Actually I gather it had a lot to do with the
In article 00fa27a3$0$15628$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
I am pleased to announce the first public release of obfuscate 0.2.2a.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/obfuscate/0.2.2a
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical
I am pleased to announce the first public release of obfuscate 0.2.2a.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/obfuscate/0.2.2a
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable for obfuscating and unobfuscating text.
obfuscate includes the following ciphers:
-
On 2010-02-09 09:37 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
I am pleased to announce the first public release of obfuscate 0.2.2a.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/obfuscate/0.2.2a
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable for obfuscating and unobfuscating text.
In article mailman.2238.1265733013.28905.python-l...@python.org,
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-02-09 09:37 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable for obfuscating and unobfuscating text.
DISCLAIMER:
On 9 February 2010 16:29, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-02-09 09:37 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
If the code base stabilizes in a production version after losing the
alphas and betas they would be a great addition to the stdlib, I
think.
Why?
I agree. Why wait? Put them
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Simon Brunning si...@brunningonline.net wrote:
On 9 February 2010 16:29, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-02-09 09:37 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
If the code base stabilizes in a production version after losing the
alphas and betas they would be
* David Robinow:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Simon Brunning si...@brunningonline.net wrote:
On 9 February 2010 16:29, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-02-09 09:37 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
If the code base stabilizes in a production version after losing the
alphas and
On 10-02-2010 00:09, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* David Robinow:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Simon Brunning
si...@brunningonline.net wrote:
On 9 February 2010 16:29, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-02-09 09:37 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
If the code base stabilizes in a
On Feb 9, 7:21 am, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article 00fa27a3$0$15628$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
[..]
No pig latin?
Wait a minute guys, Stevens a well known prankster and comic relief
clown around here, I think he's just
En Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:27:13 -0300, Stef Mientki stef.mien...@gmail.com
escribió:
On 10-02-2010 00:09, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* David Robinow:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Simon Brunning
si...@brunningonline.net wrote:
On 9 February 2010 16:29, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
sorry I don't,
unless Python is only meant for the very well educated people in encryption.
All algorithms in obfuscate are obsolete, insecure and only interesting
for people *that* want to get well educated in the history of encryption.
I neither did look at the code,
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de writes:
All algorithms in obfuscate are obsolete, insecure and only
interesting for people *that* want to get well educated in the history
of encryption.
Not true. Another use case is suggested by the chosen name for the
library: to obfuscate text against
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:03:47 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
sorry I don't,
unless Python is only meant for the very well educated people in
encryption.
All algorithms in obfuscate are obsolete, insecure and only interesting
for people *that* want to get well educated
Steven D'Aprano schrieb:
I am pleased to announce the first public release of obfuscate 0.2.2a.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/obfuscate/0.2.2a
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable for obfuscating and unobfuscating text.
obfuscate includes
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
I am pleased to announce the first public release of obfuscate 0.2.2a.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/obfuscate/0.2.2a
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable for obfuscating and unobfuscating text.
obfuscate includes the following ciphers:
- Caesar, rot13, rot5, rot18, rot47
- atbash
- Playfair, Playfair6 and Playfair16
- Railfence
I always though a double rot13 followed by a rot26 was the best?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.comwrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
obfuscate is a pure-Python module providing classical encryption
algorithms suitable for obfuscating and unobfuscating text.
Tim Chase wrote:
I prefer the strength of Triple ROT-13 for my obfuscation needs, but I
don't see it listed here.
That's old hat -- with the advent of 3GHz cpus and GPGPU, all the
experts are recommending quadruple ROT-128 nowadays.
--
Greg
--
44 matches
Mail list logo
