retrun True if type(i) is int else False
-- Original --
From: Chris Angelicoros...@gmail.com;
Date: Sat, Oct 15, 2011 08:55 AM
To: python-listpython-list@python.org;
Subject: Re: How to test if object is an integer?
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM
2011/10/15 惜悯 wa...@qq.com:
retrun True if type(i) is int else False
That tests if the object is already an int; the OP asked if a string
contains an integer.
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/15 惜悯 wa...@qq.com:
retrun True if type(i) is int else False
That tests if the object is already an int; the OP asked if a string
contains an integer.
Additionally:
* the if-then-else there is unnecessary since
On 10/14/2011 9:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
2011/10/15 惜悯wa...@qq.com:
retrun True if type(i) is int else False
That tests if the object is already an int; the OP asked if a string
contains an integer.
The misleading subject line did not. It should have been
How to test if a string
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
On 10/14/2011 9:05 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
That tests if the object is already an int; the OP asked if a string
contains an integer.
The misleading subject line did not. It should have been How to test
if a string contains an integer?
Which would
: gmane.comp.python.general
Subject: Re: How to test if a module exists?
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:26:51 +1300
Organization: Geek Central
Lines: 13
Approved: n...@gmane.org
Message-ID: ibhjib$q0...@lust.ihug.co.nz
References:
aanlktikr5euhqpupa3yrid98oas92zfhk8u9lha5y...@mail.gmail.com
mailman
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:51:38 -0800, Ethan Furman wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
As for those who persisted in posting my address after being warned of
this, I’m still deciding what to do.
You can be such an ass sometimes.
Sometimes?
--
Steven
--
On 11/12/2010 3:51 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:51:38 -0800, Ethan Furman wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
As for those who persisted in posting my address after being warned of
this, I’m still deciding what to do.
You can be such an ass sometimes.
Sometimes?
r0g aioe@technicalbloke.com writes:
Really? I get a metric butt-ton of spam every day to this address.
I'm sure I get sent a lot of spam (though I don't know for sure -- see
below). But I don't think much of it comes from Usenet harvesters any
more.
Right now it simply filtered by
On 11/11/10 11:28, Mark Wooding wrote:
r0gaioe@technicalbloke.com writes:
Really? I get a metric butt-ton of spam every day to this address.
I'm sure I get sent a lot of spam (though I don't know for sure -- see
below). But I don't think much of it comes from Usenet harvesters any
In message mailman.853.1289449099.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see
In message mailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
would seem to be an independent, true record of what
/1260153.html.
How about we look at an excerpt of the message you just sent:
===
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.nz
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.general
Subject: Re: How to test if a module exists?
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:49:18 +1300
[snip]
On Mon, Nov
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
would seem to be an
On 11/11/2010 3:26 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
On 11/11/10 20:26, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
would
On Nov 11, 1:26 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message mailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
I'm using thunderbird via gmane and see the sender shown as
l...@geek-central.gen.nz -- so, no lies -- you've been self-outed.
Emile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/11/2010 20:26, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
would
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.nz wrote:
In message mailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
In message mailman.894.1289510633.2218.python-l...@python.org, MRAB wrote:
... the next one at 3 Nov 2010 22:40 Re: Allowing comments after the line
continuation backslash and _all_ the subsequent ones arrived with an
_unobfuscated_ email address.
You mean from this one on
On 2:59 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
would seem to be
Dave Angel wrote:
On 2:59 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
On 11/11/2010 21:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.894.1289510633.2218.python-l...@python.org, MRAB wrote:
... the next one at 3 Nov 2010 22:40 Re: Allowing comments after the line
continuation backslash and _all_ the subsequent ones arrived with an
_unobfuscated_ email address.
On 11/11/2010 2:01 PM Dave Angel said...
I subscribe to this list by email, in digest form. And your email
address here has a real @ in it. Don't be so free to call people liars
when they're reporting what they actually see.
If you get this message directly, you can look at the TO: list. I just
On 11/11/2010 1:53 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.894.1289510633.2218.python-l...@python.org, MRAB wrote:
... the next one at 3 Nov 2010 22:40 Re: Allowing comments after the line
continuation backslash and _all_ the subsequent ones arrived with an
_unobfuscated_ email
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
In message mailman.894.1289510633.2218.python-l...@python.org, MRAB wrote:
... the next one at 3 Nov 2010 22:40 Re: Allowing comments after the line
continuation backslash and _all_ the subsequent ones arrived with an
On 2010-11-11 14:26 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-November/1260153.html
would
On 2010-11-11, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message mailman.843.1289438674.2218.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
Amusingly, as others have noted, you replied with an unobfuscated
email address.
This
On 2010-11-11, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message mailman.894.1289510633.2218.python-l...@python.org, MRAB wrote:
... the next one at 3 Nov 2010 22:40 Re: Allowing comments after the line
continuation backslash and _all_ the subsequent ones arrived with an
On 2010-11-11, Tim Chase python.l...@tim.thechases.com wrote:
===
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro unobfuscated
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.general
Oh, interesting.
Gee...your unobfuscated email addresses FROM YOU.
No, from gmane. Out here in comp.lang.python (no
On 11/11/10 21:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.894.1289510633.2218.python-l...@python.org, MRAB wrote:
... the next one at 3 Nov 2010 22:40 Re: Allowing comments after the line
continuation backslash and _all_ the subsequent ones arrived with an
_unobfuscated_ email address.
I have just received an admission from Barry Warsaw that a hack was done on
python-list specifically to deal with bounces caused by a list member trying
to reply to my obfuscated e-mail address.
I have asked him to undo that hack. If he likes, he can filter out that
(obfuscated) address of
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
The important point, as far as
I’m concerned, is that I do NOT want to see my unobfuscated address appear
on USENET.
You sure did a lousy job of obfuscating for someone so concerned about it.
As for those who persisted in posting my address after being warned of
On 2010-11-12, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
As for those who persisted in posting my address after being warned of this,
I'm still deciding what to do.
Plonk.
--
Grant
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/11/2010 4:55 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-11-12, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
As for those who persisted in posting my address after being warned of this,
I'm still deciding what to do.
Plonk.
Don't you mean
On 2010-11-12, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
On 11/11/10 18:20, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
As for those who persisted in posting my address after being
warned of this, I’m still deciding what to do.
I've got a hint:
1) You can pursue it with various ISPs. If you choose the
latter, I can fairly confidently say that any provider, upon
On 11/11/2010 4:20 PM Lawrence D'Oliveiro said...
I have just received an admission from Barry Warsaw that a hack was done on
python-list specifically to deal with bounces caused by a list member trying
to reply to my obfuscated e-mail address.
I have asked him to undo that hack. If he likes,
On 2010-11-12, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
I have just received an admission from Barry Warsaw that a hack was done on
python-list specifically to deal with bounces caused by a list member trying
to reply to my obfuscated e-mail address.
That's...
I have asked for my messages to be filtered from being distributed to
python-list. As far as I’m concerned, the lot of you can bloody piss off.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Nov 12, 2:53 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-
central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
I have asked for my messages to be filtered from being distributed to
python-list. As far as I’m concerned, the lot of you can bloody piss off.
Oh Lawrence, the feeling is mutual. At least then we'd be spared your
r0g aioe@technicalbloke.com writes:
You use your main address on USENET rather than a junk one!? Obfuscated or
not that's either brave or foolhardy!
I use my real email address. I also have an aggressive spam filter.
But I don't think that much of my comes from Usenet harvesters any more,
On 10/11/10 09:50, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a
In message mailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:04:01 +, Mark Wooding wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for
all to see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away.
I'm assuming this was a momentary
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.
On 11/10/10 3:50 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the
On 11/10/10 2:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
On 11/10/10 3:50 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on
On 11/10/2010 4:50 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it
On 11/10/10 03:50, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.nz wrote:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
l...@geek-central.gen.nz wrote:
In message mailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET
On 2010-11-10 22:18 , Jon Dufresne wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
l...@geek-central.gen.fine.whatever wrote:
In messagemailman.780.1289326087.2218.python-l...@python.org, Jon
Dufresne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro ...
I see that
On 10/11/10 12:45, Mark Wooding wrote:
r0gaioe@technicalbloke.com writes:
You use your main address on USENET rather than a junk one!? Obfuscated or
not that's either brave or foolhardy!
I use my real email address. I also have an aggressive spam filter.
But I don't think that much of
In message roy-e7c8b9.22342706112...@news.panix.com, Roy Smith wrote:
Fail early and often, that's what I say.
Good advice that could apply to lots of things. Except maybe procrastination
... :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jon Dufresne wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
import sys
try:
import xx
except ImportError:
tb = sys.exc_traceback
while tb:
print tb
tb = tb.tb_next
I went ahead and implemented this and it now works. I even uncovered a
In article ibatkk$t7...@lust.ihug.co.nz,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message roy-4c92bb.16523506112...@news.panix.com, Roy Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if your module's bug is that it in turn imports some
other module, which doesn't exist, you'll
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article ibatkk$t7...@lust.ihug.co.nz,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message roy-4c92bb.16523506112...@news.panix.com, Roy Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if your module's bug is that it in
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
l...@geek-central.gen.nz wrote:
In message roy-4c92bb.16523506112...@news.panix.com, Roy Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if your module's bug is that it in turn imports some
other module, which doesn't exist, you'll also get an ImportError.
In message roy-4c92bb.16523506112...@news.panix.com, Roy Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if your module's bug is that it in turn imports some
other module, which doesn't exist, you'll also get an ImportError.
Does it really matter? Either way, the module is unusable.
--
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jon Dufresne jon.dufre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My python program has an extension system where the extension can have
a optional magic python modules. Meaning if the extension module
exists, the program will use it and if not, it will continue without
the
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
Here's what I came up with:
try:
import extension_magic_module
except ImportError as err:
if err.message != No module named extension_magic_module:
raise err
else:
handle_extension_magic_module()
It
Jon Dufresne wrote in
news:aanlktikr5euhqpupa3yrid98oas92zfhk8u9lha5y...@mail.gmail.com in
gmane.comp.python.general:
try:
import extension_magic_module
except ImportError:
pass
else:
handle_extension_magic_module()
However, if the the extension module exists but throws
Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com writes:
if err.message != No module named extension_magic_module:
Ugh! Surely this can break if you use Python with different locale
settings!
-- [mdw]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Mark Wooding m...@distorted.org.uk wrote:
Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com writes:
if err.message != No module named extension_magic_module:
Ugh! Surely this can break if you use Python with different locale
settings!
Since when does Python have translated
In article mailman.699.1289068535.2218.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Jon Dufresne jon.dufre...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
However, if the the extension module exists but throws an ImportError,
due to a bug in the extension this
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jon Dufresne jon.dufre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com wrote:
Here's what I came up with:
try:
import extension_magic_module
except ImportError as err:
if err.message != No module named
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:54:09 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Mark Wooding m...@distorted.org.uk
wrote:
Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com writes:
if err.message != No module named extension_magic_module:
Ugh! Surely this can break if you use Python with
Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com writes:
Since when does Python have translated error messages?
It doesn't yet. How much are you willing to bet that it never will? ;-)
-- [mdw]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article 4cd5d8a3$0$30004$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com,
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
Since when does Python have translated error messages?
Since Python 3.2.4. Or will it be 3.3.5? I will forget.
*wink*
from __future__ import bugs
:-)
--
On 2010-11-06, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
from __future__ import bugs
Now I want this.
-s
--
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nos...@seebs.net
http://www.seebs.net/log/ -- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
import sys
try:
import xx
except ImportError:
tb = sys.exc_traceback
while tb:
print tb
tb = tb.tb_next
I went ahead and implemented this and it now works. I even uncovered a
bug I wasn't previously
In article mailman.710.1289095058.2218.python-l...@python.org,
Jon Dufresne jon.dufre...@gmail.com wrote:
I went ahead and implemented this and it now works. I even uncovered a
bug I wasn't previously seeing because now the program was failing
early! :)
Excellent. Fail early and often,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:13 PM, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
snip
It would facilitate the implementation of t() to have a simple test
for mutability. Is there one?
Non-default hashability is an approximate heuristic:
def is_immutable(x):
try:
hash(x)
except TypeError:
kj no.em...@please.post writes:
I want to implement a test t() that will return True if its two
arguments are completely different. By this I mean that they
don't share any non-atomic component. E.g., if
a = [0, 1]
b = [0, 1]
c = [2, 3]
d = [2, 3]
A = (a, c, 0)
B = (a, d, 1)
C = (b,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@gmail.com wrote:
kj no.em...@please.post writes:
I want to implement a test t() that will return True if its two
arguments are completely different. By this I mean that they
don't share any non-atomic component. E.g., if
a = [0, 1]
Chris Rebert c...@rebertia.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Arnaud Delobelle arno...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I think defining mutability is subject to opinion, but here is a first
approximation.
def mutable(obj):
return obj.__hash__ is None or type(obj).__hash__ ==
Am 07.10.2010 22:02, schrieb Chris Rebert:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:13 PM, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
snip
It would facilitate the implementation of t() to have a simple test
for mutability. Is there one?
Non-default hashability is an approximate heuristic:
Except that every user
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 07.10.2010 22:02, schrieb Chris Rebert:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:13 PM, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
snip
It would facilitate the implementation of t() to have a simple test
for mutability. Is there one?
On 2010-07-07, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Oops. Those Python bindings are for version 1.3.2 of libconfig (which
does work). They don't work with the current version of libconfig.
I've stripped the python bindings down to a minimal point, and I've
decided there may be a
On 2010-07-08, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-07-07, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Oops. Those Python bindings are for version 1.3.2 of libconfig (which
does work). They don't work with the current version of libconfig.
Python 2.6.5 (release26-maint,
On 2010-07-07, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
I'm trying to use python bindings for libconfig. There appear to be
three very slightly different bindings:
http://code.google.com/p/python-libconfig/
http://wiki.github.com/cnangel/python-libconfig/
robert somerville wrote:
I am trying to determine how to test whether variors bits are set within
a byte (or larger flag) , the python 'and' and 'or' do not seem to be
doing what i want .. does anybody have some sample code showing how to
do it ??
e.g. (in C)
unsigned char a = 6;
is 3rd
On 12-May-10 14:40 PM, MRAB wrote:
robert somerville wrote:
I am trying to determine how to test whether variors bits are set
within a byte (or larger flag) , the python 'and' and 'or' do not seem
to be doing what i want .. does anybody have some sample code showing
how to do it ??
e.g. (in C)
On May 12, 1:40 pm, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
robert somerville wrote:
I am trying to determine how to test whether variors bits are set within
a byte (or larger flag) , the python 'and' and 'or' do not seem to be
doing what i want .. does anybody have some sample code showing
Cheap Chanel Watches for sale at: http://www.luxuryowner.net/
Chanel Watches collection:
http://www.luxuryowner.net/replica-chanel-watches.html
Chanel J12 Automatic Watches:
http://www.luxuryowner.net/Chanel-J12-Automatic-Watches.html
Chanel J12 Quartz Watches:
In article mailman.233.1262197919.28905.python-l...@python.org,
Philip Semanchuk phi...@semanchuk.com wrote:
While I don't fully understand what you're trying to accomplish by
changing the URL to google.com after 3 iterations, I suspect that some
of your trouble comes from using while True.
In article hilruv$nu...@panix5.panix.com, Aahz a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
In article mailman.233.1262197919.28905.python-l...@python.org,
Philip Semanchuk phi...@semanchuk.com wrote:
While I don't fully understand what you're trying to accomplish by
changing the URL to google.com after 3
On Dec 30, 10:00 am, Brian D brianden...@gmail.com wrote:
What I don't understand is how to test for a valid URL request, and
then jump out of the while True loop to proceed to another line of
code below the loop. There's probably faulty logic in this approach. I
imagine I should wrap the URL
On Dec 30, 11:06 am, samwyse samw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 30, 10:00 am, Brian D brianden...@gmail.com wrote:
What I don't understand is how to test for a valid URL request, and
then jump out of the while True loop to proceed to another line of
code below the loop. There's probably
On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Brian D wrote:
I'm actually using mechanize, but that's too complicated for testing
purposes. Instead, I've simulated in a urllib2 sample below an attempt
to test for a valid URL request.
I'm attempting to craft a loop that will trap failed attempts to
request a
Brian D wrote:
On Dec 30, 11:06 am, samwyse samw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 30, 10:00 am, Brian D brianden...@gmail.com wrote:
What I don't understand is how to test for a valid URL request, and
then jump out of the while True loop to proceed to another line of
code below the loop. There's
On Dec 30, 12:31 pm, Philip Semanchuk phi...@semanchuk.com wrote:
On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Brian D wrote:
I'm actually using mechanize, but that's too complicated for testing
purposes. Instead, I've simulated in a urllib2 sample below an attempt
to test for a valid URL request.
Thanks MRAB as well. I've printed all of the replies to retain with my
pile of essential documentation.
To follow up with a complete response, I'm ripping out of my mechanize
module the essential components of the solution I got to work.
The main body of the code passes a URL to the
Brian D wrote:
Thanks MRAB as well. I've printed all of the replies to retain with my
pile of essential documentation.
To follow up with a complete response, I'm ripping out of my mechanize
module the essential components of the solution I got to work.
The main body of the code passes a URL to
On Dec 30, 7:08 pm, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Brian D wrote:
Thanks MRAB as well. I've printed all of the replies to retain with my
pile of essential documentation.
To follow up with a complete response, I'm ripping out of my mechanize
module the essential components of the
Brian D wrote:
[...]
I'm definitely acquiring some well-deserved schooling -- and it's
really appreciated. I'd seen the is/is not preference before, but it
just didn't stick.
Yes, a lot of people have acquired the majority of their Python
education from this list - I have certainly learned a
Hi,
kj wrote:
I want to write some tests for code that uses both urllib and
urllib2.
Take a look at the discussion under the title How can one mock/stub
python module like urllib at stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/295438/how-can-one-mock-stub-python-module-like-urllib
Lutz
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:06:45 +0100, Lutz Horn wrote:
Hi,
kj wrote:
I want to write some tests for code that uses both urllib and urllib2.
Take a look at the discussion under the title How can one mock/stub
python module like urllib at stackoverflow:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:19:55 -0500
Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
'symbolic_link' is a symbolic link in the current directory. I run
'python main.py', but it does not return me anything. I want to check
if a file is a symbolic link. I'm wondering what is the correct way to
do so?
$cat
101 - 200 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
