>
> The source code is here:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/socketserver.py . You
> should find all the technical details you are looking for in it.
>
>
# poll/select have the advantage of not requiring any extra file
> descriptor,# contrarily to epoll/kqueue (also, they requi
On 11/28/19 8:46 PM, lampahome wrote:
> As title,
>
> I want to use socketserver to replace my own server code to
> maintain ealsier.
>
> But I don't found any info about tech. detail of socketserver, epoll is
> important.
>
> Can anyone tell me?
The source
As title,
I want to use socketserver to replace my own server code to
maintain ealsier.
But I don't found any info about tech. detail of socketserver, epoll is
important.
Can anyone tell me?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2017 15:10:12 UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> You're getting HTTP/1.1 requests. Maybe you need to send a
>> "Connection: close" header to tell the browser to leave you be?
>
> That sounds possible - I don't really know enoug
On Monday, 3 April 2017 15:10:12 UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> You're getting HTTP/1.1 requests. Maybe you need to send a
> "Connection: close" header to tell the browser to leave you be?
That sounds possible - I don't really know enough about HTTP to even know that
was a thing, so I'm not surp
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2017 14:20:43 UTC+1, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Monday, 3 April 2017 14:00:18 UTC+1, eryk sun wrote:
>> > It should service the request and return to the serve_forever() loop.
>> > Do you see a line logged for each request, l
On Monday, 3 April 2017 14:20:43 UTC+1, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2017 14:00:18 UTC+1, eryk sun wrote:
> > It should service the request and return to the serve_forever() loop.
> > Do you see a line logged for each request, like "[IP] - - [date] "GET
> > ..."?
>
> Yes, I see that a
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2017 14:00:18 UTC+1, eryk sun wrote:
>> It should service the request and return to the serve_forever() loop.
>> Do you see a line logged for each request, like "[IP] - - [date] "GET
>> ..."?
>
> Yes, I see that and the page
On Monday, 3 April 2017 14:00:18 UTC+1, eryk sun wrote:
> It should service the request and return to the serve_forever() loop.
> Do you see a line logged for each request, like "[IP] - - [date] "GET
> ..."?
Yes, I see that and the page is served.
>py .\example.py
Serving HTTP on port 8000...
12
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:23:11 UTC+1, eryk sun wrote:
>> It works for me when run from a command prompt in Windows 10.
>> serve_forever() uses select() with a timeout of 0.5s, so it doesn't
>> block the main thread.
>
> Odd. For me, it doesn
On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:23:11 UTC+1, eryk sun wrote:
> It works for me when run from a command prompt in Windows 10.
> serve_forever() uses select() with a timeout of 0.5s, so it doesn't
> block the main thread.
Odd. For me, it doesn't work (Windows 7, but I can't see why that would affect
it
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> I know I've seen this before, but for the life of me I can't find any
> reference.
>
> If I write a simple web server using wsgiref, something like
>
> from wsgiref.simple_server import make_server, demo_app
>
> with make_server('', 800
I know I've seen this before, but for the life of me I can't find any reference.
If I write a simple web server using wsgiref, something like
from wsgiref.simple_server import make_server, demo_app
with make_server('', 8000, demo_app) as httpd:
print("Serving HTTP on port 8000...
K Richard Pixley wrote:
[...]
> The doc says server.shutdown(), but if I call self.server.shutdown()
> from within handler.handle(), I seem to get a deadlock, which is exactly
> what I'd expect in a single threaded system with no way to "signal" the
> server.server_forever() loop which is several f
Once I've instantiated my server class, along with a handler class,
called server.serve_forever(), handler.handle() has been called, I've
done my work, and I'm ready to shut the whole thing down...
How do I do that?
The doc says server.shutdown(), but if I call self.server.shutdown()
from wit
In article <4eb00a7a$0$6560$9b4e6...@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>,
MrSmile wrote:
> Hi people!
> I have asked myself why I am not capable sending 2 messages a time to a
> Socketserver. Why is that?!
There's a lot of confusing code here. It would help when asking these
k
7;%s' % data)
received[1] = sock.recv(1024)
sock.close()
print received
Server:
import SocketServer
from ast import literal_eval
class MySockX(SocketServer.BaseRequestHandler):
def handle(self):
data = self.request.recv(1024)
data = literal_eval(data)
data = &#
On 01/11/2011 15:07, MrSmile wrote:
Hi people!
I have asked myself why I am not capable sending 2 messages a time to a
Socketserver. Why is that?!
Here the Server:
import SocketServer
from ast import literal_eval
class MKTest(object):
DSX = []
MKTestInst = None
def __init__
MKTest.getObj(data[0]) will return the same object on every call(with the same
data that was initialized 1'st time). Any Daten parameter after the 1'st call
is ignored.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi people!
I have asked myself why I am not capable sending 2 messages a time to a
Socketserver. Why is that?!
Here the Server:
import SocketServer
from ast import literal_eval
class MKTest(object):
DSX = []
MKTestInst = None
def __init__(self,Daten):
MKTest.DSX.append
Hi people!
I have asked myself why I am not capable sending 2 messages a time to a
Socketserver. Why is that?!
Here the Server:
import SocketServer
from ast import literal_eval
class MKTest(object):
DSX = []
MKTestInst = None
def __init__(self,Daten):
MKTest.DSX.append
given)
I get this error with a program, after upgrading to python 2.7. I'm
using a program that is based on SocketServer and SimpleXMLRPCDispatcher.
Any idea how to fix this?
Strange, I expected at least one or two more stack frames in the
traceback you posted (from within the socket
I get this error with a program, after upgrading to python 2.7. I'm
using a program that is based on SocketServer and SimpleXMLRPCDispatcher.
Any idea how to fix this?
Thanks,
Laszlo
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 28 Feb, 13:34, cmcp wrote:
> In method StopServer() of class MyServer try calling self.server_close()
> after the self.shutdown() call. I believe this will actually close the
> server's socket and allow its reuse.
It works! Thank you!!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
In method StopServer() of class MyServer try calling self.server_close() after
the self.shutdown() call. I believe this will actually close the server's
socket and allow its reuse.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi everyone!
in my script (Python 2.6 on windows 7) I have to set up a SocketServer
server and use it to handle external connections. During the execution
It can happen that this server should be closed and restarted (for
example with different port or host). The following piece of code
simulates
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:45:29 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>> The problem with using the loopback interface is that it's still
>> "network access", which can run into all kinds of issues with security
>> policies, firewalls, etc.
>
> What kind of crappy firewall blocks loopback traffic? Really?
T
On Saturday 25 September 2010, it occurred to Nobody to exclaim:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:28:45 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> > If you're using UNIX, and you don't actually need the stream to be
> > passed via the hard drive (why would you?), but for some reason want to
> > use the file system, lo
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:28:45 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> If you're using UNIX, and you don't actually need the stream to be
> passed via the hard drive (why would you?), but for some reason want to
> use the file system, look info UNIX/local sockets. But, really, I'm
> guessing that local TCP s
On 9/24/2010 12:53 AM, antoine wrote:
Hello,
I would like to create a python server for which the requests are
passed by files on the hard drive instead of a network.
I am currently looking at the SocketServer python module, hoping for
an easy modification.
Is it doable at all?
If yes, how
On Friday 24 September 2010, it occurred to antoine to exclaim:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to create a python server for which the requests are
> passed by files on the hard drive instead of a network.
> I am currently looking at the SocketServer python module, hoping for
> an
Hello,
I would like to create a python server for which the requests are
passed by files on the hard drive instead of a network.
I am currently looking at the SocketServer python module, hoping for
an easy modification.
Is it doable at all?
If yes, how should it be done?
Thanks,
Antoine
En Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:13:58 -0300, Jordan Apgar
escribió:
I'm having some issues connecting to my Socket Server, I get this
traceback on the sever side:
Exception happened during processing of request from ('127.0.0.1',
56404)
Traceback (most recent
dComs import *
from Crypto.Hash import SHA256
from Crypto.Cipher import AES
from Crypto import Random
from Crypto.PublicKey import RSA
import xmlrpclib as xmlrpc
import os
import SocketServer
class Negotiator(SocketServer.BaseRequestHandler):
CLIENT_KEY = 0
CSCIPHER = 1
SCCIPHER = 2
CSHAL
This may not be the correct list for this issue, if so I would appreciate if
anyone could forward it to the correct list.
I had experienced a number of problems with standard library SocketServer when
implementing a tcp forking server under python 2.6. I fixed every
issue including some
Kiki wrote:
Thank you Dennis
I'm using 2 differents editor, which may be the cause of such a mess
in the indentation.
I must admitt that I lazily rely on those (not so bad indeed) editors.
"If indentation whas bad they would have tell me"
Too bad am i
Won't post misindeted code anymore.
Thank you Dennis
I'm using 2 differents editor, which may be the cause of such a mess
in the indentation.
I must admitt that I lazily rely on those (not so bad indeed) editors.
"If indentation whas bad they would have tell me"
Too bad am i
Won't post misindeted code anymore.
--
http://mail.py
Hello list,
I've written a small Client/server system.
Basically, i'm expecting something like : The client sends every once
and a while a small data chunk (not more than 50 bytes) the server
receive it and print it.
Here is the server request handler :
class ThreadedTCPRequestHandlerFoo(SocketS
rote:
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Shutdown implies closing the listening socket, doesn't it?
No (perhaps it should, but that is another issue). There is a
documentation bug; BaseServer.shutdown is documented as "Tells the
serve_forever() loop to stop and
roblems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Shutdown implies closing the listening socket, doesn't it?
No (perhaps it should, but that is another issue). There is a
documentation bug; BaseServer.shutdown is documented as "Tells the
serve_forever() loop to stop and waits until it does.&q
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Fri, 15 May 2009 09:04:05 -0300, Igor Katson escribió:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message ,
Igor Katson wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message ,
Igor Katson wrote:
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Do you want to do a s
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Fri, 15 May 2009 09:04:05 -0300, Igor Katson escribió:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message ,
Igor Katson wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message ,
Igor Katson wrote:
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Do you want to do a s
En Fri, 15 May 2009 09:04:05 -0300, Igor Katson escribió:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message , Igor
Katson wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message , Igor
Katson wrote:
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Do you want to do a shutdown or a close?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message , Igor Katson
wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message , Igor
Katson wrote:
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Do you want to do a shutdown or a close?
I want the server close
In message , Igor Katson
wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> In message , Igor
>> Katson wrote:
>>
>>> I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
>>
>> Do you want to do a shutdown or a close?
>>
> I want the serv
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message , Igor Katson
wrote:
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Do you want to do a shutdown or a close?
I want the server close the socket, and the program to continue after
that (in this case, just to terminate).
--
In message , Igor Katson
wrote:
> I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown.
Do you want to do a shutdown or a close?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have problems in getting a SocketServer to shutdown. Why does this not
actually stop the application?
from SocketServer import UnixStreamServer, BaseRequestHandler
server = UnixStreamServer('/tmp/ss.sock', BaseRequestHandler)
try:
server.serve_forever()
except Keyboar
On Apr 30, 1:02 pm, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I am working on a overlay network implementation with python. I need
> > to use both IPv4 and IPv6 at each node. Python socketserver is being
> > used for this task. can anybody pls suggest me how to input an IPv6
>
> I am working on a overlay network implementation with python. I need
> to use both IPv4 and IPv6 at each node. Python socketserver is being
> used for this task. can anybody pls suggest me how to input an IPv6
> address to the socketserver.
I'm not quite sure I understand the
Hello,
I am working on a overlay network implementation with python. I need
to use both IPv4 and IPv6 at each node. Python socketserver is being
used for this task. can anybody pls suggest me how to input an IPv6
address to the socketserver.
Thanks in advance,
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
In article <45bd$0$2191$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>,
David George wrote:
>
>Thanks to everybody for helping me with this matter, but eventually
>i've had to settle for a simpler and probably far less elegant solution
>due to time constraints.
>
>It seems that SocketServer.py in 2.6 doesn't d
On 2009-03-12 08:03:06 +, "Mark Tolonen" said:
"Falcolas" wrote in message
news:1b6a95a4-5680-442e-8ad0-47aa9ea08...@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 11, 1:11 pm, David George wrote:
Again, problem here is the issue of being unable to kill the server
while it's waiting on a reque
"Falcolas" wrote in message
news:1b6a95a4-5680-442e-8ad0-47aa9ea08...@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 11, 1:11 pm, David George wrote:
Again, problem here is the issue of being unable to kill the server
while it's waiting on a request. In theory, i could force it to
continue by sending
On Mar 11, 1:11 pm, David George wrote:
> Again, problem here is the issue of being unable to kill the server
> while it's waiting on a request. In theory, i could force it to
> continue by sending some sort of junk data with the method i use to
> stop the server, but that seems a bit hacky, don't
ome code for a university project using Python.
We've been working on an existing codebase, cleaning it up and removin
g
dead wood.
We decided to make some changes to internal message handling by using
a
SocketServer, which worked great when we were using 2.6, as we could
simply call
been developing some code for a university project using Python.
> >> We've been working on an existing codebase, cleaning it up and removing
> >> dead wood.
>
> >> We decided to make some changes to internal message handling by using a
> >> SocketServer,
e, cleaning it up and removing
dead wood.
We decided to make some changes to internal message handling by using a
SocketServer, which worked great when we were using 2.6, as we could
simply call its shutdown() method when we wanted to stop it from
'serving forever'.
Unfortunately, we&
On Mar 10, 7:19 pm, David George wrote:
> So, my question is, is there any way to stop a SocketServer that's been
> told to server forever in python 2.5?
serve_forever, in python 2.5, is simply coded as:
while 1:
self.handle_request()
So, instead of calling serve_fo
changes to internal message handling by using a
SocketServer, which worked great when we were using 2.6, as we could
simply call its shutdown() method when we wanted to stop it from 'serving
forever'.
Unfortunately, we've now needed to downgrade to python 2.5 to accomodate
the
Hi guys,
I've been developing some code for a university project using Python.
We've been working on an existing codebase, cleaning it up and removing
dead wood.
We decided to make some changes to internal message handling by using a
SocketServer, which worked great when we were
On Feb 11, 4:01 pm, Daniel wrote:
> I've just been reading the docs to help me with a SocketServer issue.
> I found in the docs (http://docs.python.org/library/socketserver.html)
> a reference to a member attribute timeout and a member function
> handle_timeout() is made. I am
I've just been reading the docs to help me with a SocketServer issue.
I found in the docs (http://docs.python.org/library/socketserver.html)
a reference to a member attribute timeout and a member function
handle_timeout() is made. I am using python 2.5 and there's no
indication that
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:31:52 -0800 (PST), markobrie...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Cheers mate I had a look into twisted but was put off by the FAQ
stating 1.0+ modules may or may not be stable, and only the 'core' is.
I don't wanna be messing around with a potentially buggy server, so im
gonna roll
On Jan 29, 8:54 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:38:43 -0800 (PST), markobrie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >G'day
>
> >I'm currently usingsocketserverto build a simple XMLSocket (an XML
> >based protocol used for communication between flash and the outside
> >world) server. I've go
Cheers mate I had a look into twisted but was put off by the FAQ
stating 1.0+ modules may or may not be stable, and only the 'core' is.
I don't wanna be messing around with a potentially buggy server, so im
gonna roll my own using the sockets module.
You didn't read that FAQ right: its addres
On Jan 30, 5:54 am, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:38:43 -0800 (PST), markobrie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >G'day
>
> >I'm currentlyusingsocketserverto build a simple XMLSocket (an XML
> >based protocol used for communication between flash and the outside
> >world) server. I've got
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:38:43 -0800 (PST), markobrie...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day
I'm currently using socketserver to build a simple XMLSocket (an XML
based protocol used for communication between flash and the outside
world) server. I've got flash establishing a connection, sendin
G'day
I'm currently using socketserver to build a simple XMLSocket (an XML
based protocol used for communication between flash and the outside
world) server. I've got flash establishing a connection, sending a
request and my python server responding. However at this point
socketse
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Ben Sizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 12:46 am, "James Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Try these instead:
>> * UDPServer
>> ->http://trac.softcircuit.com.au/circuits/browser/examples/udpserver.py
>> * UDPClient
>> ->http://trac.softcircuit.c
I D wrote:
> Hello James,
> Thanks for your response.
> But I cannot use a third party software, I need to use the exisiting
> API's within python.
> As I am new to python, I suspected that I should go by a simpler
> approach and so
> scrapped off the below code and wrote a very simple UDP server c
If I wait until _BaseServer__serving is True before calling shutdown
things go better.
Okko Willeboordse wrote:
> All,
>
> With Python 2.5 SocketServer features the shutdown method that can be
> called from another thread to stop the serve_forever loop.
>
> However;
>
On Nov 6, 12:46 am, "James Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Try these instead:
> * UDPServer
> ->http://trac.softcircuit.com.au/circuits/browser/examples/udpserver.py
> * UDPClient
> ->http://trac.softcircuit.com.au/circuits/browser/examples/udpclient.py
Since there's no contact details
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM, James Mills
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:57 AM, I D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your response.
> > But I cannot use a third party software, I need to use the exisiting
> API's
> > within python.
>
> Why ?
@Sam@ That is the r
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:57 AM, I D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your response.
> But I cannot use a third party software, I need to use the exisiting API's
> within python.
Why ?
> Even this seems to lose packets, I would really appreciate if any pointers
> can be provided to improve
Hello James,
Thanks for your response.
But I cannot use a third party software, I need to use the exisiting API's
within python.
As I am new to python, I suspected that I should go by a simpler approach
and so
scrapped off the below code and wrote a very simple UDP server code as
follows:
logFileN
All,
With Python 2.5 SocketServer features the shutdown method that can be
called from another thread to stop the serve_forever loop.
However;
When the shutdown method is called before serve_forever, shutdown will
never return.
This can happen when a server is stopped during startup.
In other
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:53 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> logFileName = 'log.txt'
>logfile = open(logFileName, "a")
>class MyUDPServer(SocketServer.UDPServer):
>def server_bind(self):
>self.socket.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET,
> socket.SO_
leExists(logFileName):
logfile = open(logFileName, "a")
logfile.writelines(self.rfile.readlines())
server = MyUDPServer(("",PORT), LogsDumpHandler)
server.serve_forever()
logfile.close()
The above python code is a UDP server
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:44:46 +0200, "Diez B. Roggisch"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Alexandru Mosoi wrote:
>
>> supposing that I have a server (an instance of SocketServer()) that
>> waits for a connection (ie is blocked in accept()) and in another
>> threa
Alexandru Mosoi wrote:
> supposing that I have a server (an instance of SocketServer()) that
> waits for a connection (ie is blocked in accept()) and in another
> thread i want to stop the server, how do I do that?
By setting a timeout on the socket using socket.settimeout,
supposing that I have a server (an instance of SocketServer()) that
waits for a connection (ie is blocked in accept()) and in another
thread i want to stop the server, how do I do that?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Guilherme Polo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Ken Seehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using SocketServer to implement a local server that serves comet
long-polling connections.
How do I increase the maximum number of open connections? Currently it is
limited to abou
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Ken Seehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using SocketServer to implement a local server that serves comet
> long-polling connections.
>
> How do I increase the maximum number of open connections? Currently it is
> limited to about
I'm using SocketServer to implement a local server that serves comet
long-polling connections.
How do I increase the maximum number of open connections? Currently it
is limited to about 8 I think. More than that and it seems to block on
opening more connections until one of the
I apologize if this message is a repeat. It looks like didn't get received.
I'm using SocketServer to implement a local server that serves comet
long-polling connections.
How do I increase the maximum number of open connections? Currently it
is limited to about 8 I think. More
On May 25, 10:40 am, eliben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small wxPython application. Today I was trying to add some
> RPC capability to it, so I implemented an instance of
> SimpleXMLRPCServer that runs in a separate thread when invoked and
> answers requests.
>
> All went fine
eliben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I ended up using an ugly hack to make it work for me. Since
>handle_request() only blocks until a request is received, the thread
>can be unblocked by sending it a real message. So to stop a server, I
>opened a XML-RPC client connection (using ServerProxy from x
rces which can't just be dropped
suddenly, and have to be cleaned in a proper manner. (Does this sound
like the truth ?)
Anyway, this creates a problem because SimpleXMLRPCServer likes to
block and never return. I dug deeper and found out that all offspring
of SocketServer can only handle request
Dear all,
I have a TCP server written using SocketServer with ForkingMixIn.
Servicing connections is CPU-bound and can take several seconds.
I now need a way to safely tell the master process to update its state (by
groveling in a PostgreSQL database, potentially for several seconds). How
can I
Chris Mellon wrote:
>> My problem (and the reason I set reuse to True) is this: if I have
>> connections active when I restart my service, upon restart, the socket
>> will
>> fail to bind because there is still a connection in a WAIT state.
>
> This is just the way sockets work on your platform. H
ly option would be to sit there in a loop calling
> serve_forever until it doesn't throw a "can't bind to socket" exception.
>
> Or is there something I'm *really* missing about the way SocketServer is
> supposed to work? Am I supposed to notify my connection
quot; exception.
Or is there something I'm *really* missing about the way SocketServer is
supposed to work? Am I supposed to notify my connection threads to shut
down and disconnect "properly?" Which gets even more fun since they are
sitting there waiting for input on the connection and n
clients connected]," and that
> self.allow_reuse_address = False makes restarting a server a pain if there
> were connected clients, why does SocketServer default allow_reuse_address
> to False? It's kind of bemusing to subclass ThreadingTCPServer just to
> change one variable that argua
lse makes restarting a server a pain if there
> were connected clients, why does SocketServer default allow_reuse_address
> to False? It's kind of bemusing to subclass ThreadingTCPServer just to
> change one variable that arguably should have been True in the first place.
>
>
there
were connected clients, why does SocketServer default allow_reuse_address
to False? It's kind of bemusing to subclass ThreadingTCPServer just to
change one variable that arguably should have been True in the first place.
Is there some history to this of which I'm not aware? Is there a g
Reid Priedhorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am implementing a forking SocketServer daemon that maintains significant
> internal state (a graph that takes ~30s to build by fetching from a SQL
> database, and eventually further state that may take up to an hour to
> bui
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> Another possibility is that the signal handler simply sets a needs_update
> flag, which I could check for in a handle_request() loop. The disadvantage
> here is that the update wouldn't happen until after the next request is
> handled, and I would like the state to be ava
Hi folks,
I am implementing a forking SocketServer daemon that maintains significant
internal state (a graph that takes ~30s to build by fetching from a SQL
database, and eventually further state that may take up to an hour to
build).
I would like to be able to notify the daemon that it needs to
Hello,
I'm a Python newbie trying to figure out how to use SocketServer with
IPv6. I would like to set up a TCPServer working like below but how to
tell SocketServer I need to use AF_INET6?
import SocketServer
import logging as l
l.basicConfig(level=l.DEBUG,
f
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
