Steve Holden wrote:
'Scuse me? This group has a long history of off-topic posting, and
anyway who decided that CPython should be the exclusive focus? Even
on-topic we can talk about Jython and PyPy as well as CPython.
I agree with your point, although Hans Nowak and others may not.
Anything
Doug Holton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you can't accept free speech and different perspectives, you're
going to be disappointed. But please do not react by trying to
intimidate and troll others here.
Weren't you the one telling the rest of us what's appropriate for this
group? Maybe you
Nick Vargish wrote:
Doug Holton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you can't accept free speech and different perspectives, you're
going to be disappointed. But please do not react by trying to
intimidate and troll others here.
Weren't you the one telling the rest of us what's appropriate for this
Doug Holton wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
'Scuse me? This group has a long history of off-topic posting, and
anyway who decided that CPython should be the exclusive focus? Even
on-topic we can talk about Jython and PyPy as well as CPython.
I agree with your point, although Hans Nowak and others may
Hans Nowak wrote:
Now you're trying to make it seem like I am against free speech on this
list, and against people's rights to discuss whatever they want. I
never said that, and I in fact enjoy the fact that c.l.py posters are an
eclectic bunch who have knowledge of, and like to talk about, a
Doug Holton wrote:
Hans Nowak wrote:
Now you're trying to make it seem like I am against free speech on
this list, and against people's rights to discuss whatever they want.
I never said that, and I in fact enjoy the fact that c.l.py posters
are an eclectic bunch who have knowledge of, and
Hans Nowak wrote:
You said that boo should not be mentioned on this newsgroup.
Please point me to the post where I said that. Since everything is
stored in Google Groups, it should be easy for you to come up with an
URL... if such a post existed.
Quote:
this is comp.lang.python, not
Hans Nowak wrote:
Quote:
this is comp.lang.python, not comp.lang.boo.
Which is obviously not the same as Boo should not be mentioned on this
newsgroup.
I used the exact same phrase in another note except using the term
logo instead of boo, and that is the exact interpretation I
immediately
Doug Holton wrote:
Hans Nowak wrote:
Quote:
this is comp.lang.python, not comp.lang.boo.
Which is obviously not the same as Boo should not be mentioned on this
newsgroup.
I used the exact same phrase in another note except using the term
logo instead of boo, and that is the exact
Doug Holton wrote:
Hans Nowak wrote:
Quote:
this is comp.lang.python, not comp.lang.boo.
Which is obviously not the same as Boo should not be mentioned on
this newsgroup.
I used the exact same phrase in another note except using the term
logo instead of boo, and that is the exact
Hans Nowak wrote:
The discussion with Logo and other languages in it was off-topic too,
but it wasn't offensive to anyone.
I'm not going to dignify that or the rest of your note with a response.
No, by all means, let's ignore any pieces of a post that might lead to
constructive discussion.
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote:
Non sequitur. The phrase's interpretation depends on the posting(s) it
refers to.
Exactly. He was saying boo (and/or I) am offensive, but logo is not.
And then he apologized for misleading me to believe he was censuring me
instead of flaming me.
--
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Erik Max Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Holton wrote:
I'm not going to dignify that or the rest of your note with a response.
Please stop dignifying the whole group, then.
Seconded. This is an extremely undignified newsgroup.
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
13 matches
Mail list logo
