Ramchandra Apte maniandra...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry,
To clarify:
Python 2.7 is in bug-fix mode which means only minor enhancements are allowed.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14961
Robert Lehmann lehman...@gmail.com added the comment:
Your proposal seems two-fold: (a) make map/filter lazy and (b) have them as
methods instead of functions.
It seems Tim borrowed Guido's time machine and already implemented (a) in
Python 3.x, see http://docs.python.org/py3k/library
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
As Robert noted, the map() and filter() builtins in Python 3 are already lazy
and there's no reason to expand the iterator protocol for this functionality.
Map and filter also have dedicated syntax in the form of comprehensions and
generator
Dear All,
I am looking for Python script for Vector Map simplification, preserving shape
and topology.
Please get in touch with davidg...@yahoo.co.uk
Regards.
David
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18/05/12 03:46, David Shi wrote:
Dear All,
I am looking for Python script for Vector Map simplification, preserving
shape and topology.
Please get in touch with davidg...@yahoo.co.uk
Regards.
David
David,
You really need to provide more information to get a specific answer;
what
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment:
New changeset 3b505df38fd8 by Jason R. Coombs in branch '3.2':
Issue #12666: Clarifying changes in map for Python 3
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3b505df38fd8
New changeset 0e2812b16f5f by Jason R. Coombs in branch '3.2
Changes by Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
___
Changes by cedre.m cedr...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +cedrem
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7983
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
cedre.m cedr...@gmail.com added the comment:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/170559/EN-US
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/cc305152.aspx
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7983
On Sep 29, 12:52 pm, Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably the google maps routes will be faster (maybe using embedded webkit
window). However it requires internet connection.
See alsohttp://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/Matplotlib/Maps
Thanks. But I just needed a small radius, not the
You could create the webpage and then render
it in your desktop app. I have seen plenty of apps like that.
That's a good idea. I was able to get the basics of the pymaps
approach going, so I may do just this. Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Probably the google maps routes will be faster (maybe using embedded webkit
window). However it requires internet connection.
See also http://www.scipy.org/Cookbook/Matplotlib/Maps
HTH
--
Miki Tebeka miki.teb...@gmail.com
http://pythonwise.blogspot.com
--
I see there is pymaps, a Python wrapper for Google Maps. I may try
that but it seems to be barely documented and would require making a
webpage with javascript to display the map, whereas I'd probably
prefer a desktop app for this--though I'd consider a web page (it's
probably easier than I think
Recommendations sought for using Python to plot points/custom markers
(and maybe other things?) on a map of an area of the U.S. of maybe 100
miles radius. (This would be a political map showing towns, such as
from Google Maps or Mapquest, and not a physical map). I'll need to
place markers
and might be a useful extension.
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 143511
nosy: acooke
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Support for iterators in multiprocessing map
type: feature request
versions: Python 3.4
___
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Since it's a feature request, I would suggest to look whether it can apply to
concurrent.futures instead.
--
nosy: +pitrou
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Nayuta Taga ganaware+bugs.python@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16301/cp932_roundtrip.tar.bz2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7983
___
Nayuta Taga ganaware+bugs.python@gmail.com added the comment:
I have updated the tables about the latest Pythons (2.7.2, 3.2.1).
The patches for 2.7a3 can be applied to 2.7.2 and 3.2.1 successfully.
The latest Pythons still have the problem.
Their encoding maps from Unicode to CP932 are
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
The content of the patch is very helpful, but I question its location: I’m not
sure people will find this nugget in the 3.2+ version of the What’s New in
Python 3.0 document (sorry for not bringing that up sooner). Maybe you could
update
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
I have reported the bugs to the metatracker. In the meantime, could you
manually upload a diff?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
I'm attaching the diff at
https://bitbucket.org/jaraco/cpython-issue12666/changeset/bc362109eed8
--
keywords: +patch
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file22848/cpython-issue12666-bc362109eed8.diff
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
(HTTPS repos are not supported)
--
hgrepos: +51
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Can you provide a public URI?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
___
___
Changes by Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file22839/bc362109eed8.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
___
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
I don't know how that repo got to be private; I created it just like every
other public repo I have, and I thought I was only allowed one private repo
(this was my second). In any case, I updated the setting, and now it appears to
be
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
I'm not sure how the bugtracker patch mechanism works, but the patch it
produced included a lot of changes that I didn't make (changesets already
committed to the master repo).
--
keywords: -patch
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: docs@python - rhettinger
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
___
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
versions: -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12666
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Hi,
I've experience working at companies where, because of the network set
up, having a long PYTHONPATH and searching it is quite a heavy task
and can slow down the start up of the interpreter when there are lots
of imports.
As a proof of concept I wanted to look at a map-based approach
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
I've created a patch to address (1) and (2).
Is there any value in also including this in the 2to3 fixer? I can see that
it's a simple translation, but adds complexity to the converted code. I'd be
content to go with just a documentation
New submission from Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com:
In `whatsnew/3.0.html`, there is little said about the map builtin:
map() and filter() return iterators. If you really need a list, a quick fix is
e.g. list(map(...)), but a better fix is often to use a list comprehension
(especially when
Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com added the comment:
I believe the correct solution to (2) is to use itertools.zip_longest. So to
port to Python 3, the example would use:
print(list(map(to_tuple, itertools.zip_longest([1,2,3], [4,5,6,7
Changes by bjorn lofdahl bjorn.lofd...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 2.6, Python
2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12506
Changes by bjorn lofdahl bjorn.lofd...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12506
___
___
: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: NIS module cant handle multiple NIS map entries for the same GID
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12506
On May 24, 12:27 am, Deeyana d.awlb...@hotmail.invalid wrote:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Scheme does not come OOTB
with any suitable libraries for host interop and though it can make calls
to C libraries, doing so is awkward and involves difficulties with the
impedance
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Deeyana d.awlberg@hotmail.invalid wrote:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Scheme does not come OOTB
with any suitable libraries for host interop and though it can make calls
to C libraries, doing so is awkward and involves difficulties with the
On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:39:15 -0700, asandroq wrote:
On May 24, 12:27 am, Deeyana d.awlb...@hotmail.invalid wrote:
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Scheme does not come OOTB
with any suitable libraries for host interop and though it can make
calls to C libraries, doing so is
On May 23, 4:29 am, Deeyana d.awlb...@hotmail.invalid wrote:
You might be interested in Clojure, then. Lists are more abstracted, like
in Scheme, and vectors and also dictionaries/maps and sets are first
class citizens along side lists. And unlike Scheme, Clojure has good
library/host interop
torb...@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) writes:
Xah Lee xah...@gmail.com writes:
Functional Programing: stop using recursion, cons. Use map vectors.
〈Guy Steele on Parallel Programing〉
http://xahlee.org/comp/Guy_Steele_parallel_computing.html
This is more or less what Backus said
On 23.5.2011 16:39, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
torb...@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) writes:
Xah Leexah...@gmail.com writes:
Functional Programing: stop using recursion, cons. Use map vectors.
〈Guy Steele on Parallel Programing〉
http://xahlee.org/comp
On Mon, 23 May 2011 00:52:07 -0700, asandroq wrote:
On May 23, 4:29 am, Deeyana d.awlb...@hotmail.invalid wrote:
You might be interested in Clojure, then. Lists are more abstracted,
like in Scheme, and vectors and also dictionaries/maps and sets are
first class citizens along side lists. And
this is important but i think most lispers and functional programers
still don't know it.
Functional Programing: stop using recursion, cons. Use map vectors.
〈Guy Steele on Parallel Programing〉
http://xahlee.org/comp/Guy_Steele_parallel_computing.html
btw, lists (as cons, car, cdr
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:47:53 -0700, Xah Lee wrote:
this is important but i think most lispers and functional programers
still don't know it.
Functional Programing: stop using recursion, cons. Use map vectors.
〈Guy Steele on Parallel Programing〉
http://xahlee.org/comp
On Apr 25, 7:42 pm, Paul Rubin no.em...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com writes:
Here's a handy utility function for you guys to play with:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577676/
Cute, but why not use collections.defaultdict for the return dict?
Untested:
My
Here's a handy utility function for you guys to play with:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577676/
Raymond
twitter: @raymondh
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com writes:
Here's a handy utility function for you guys to play with:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577676/
Cute, but why not use collections.defaultdict for the return dict?
Untested:
d = defaultdict(list)
for key,value in
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:48:42 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Here's a handy utility function for you guys to play with:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577676/
Nice.
That's similar to itertools.groupby except that it consolidates all the
equal key results into one list, instead of
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
I agree with Ray. This is essentially a feature request which you say has
already been implemented in Py 3 but which cannot go into Py2.7. Only fixes for
bugs (discrepancies between doc and behavior) can go into 2.7. I suspect 2.6
and before
Ray.Allen ysj@gmail.com added the comment:
There maybe compatibility issues which prevent such behavior change.
--
nosy: +ysj.ray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11655
___
New submission from Lukas Lueg lukas.l...@gmail.com:
The built-in function map() currently swallows any exception that might have
occured while trying to get an iterator from any parameter. This produces
unexpected behaviour for applications that require a certain type of exception
as
map([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2])
I don't expect the drop. The original nested structure is very
important.
What do you expect to happen if the sub-sequences don't match up exactly?
E.g. a = [1, 2, [3, 4]]; b = [1, [2, 3], 4]
What do you expect to happen if the shorter list
,[6,7,8],9,10].
You have misunderstood me. I'm not saying that you should force the users
to clean up the data (although of course you could do that), but that you
should do so before handing it to map.
Rather than putting all the smarts into enhanced_map, and having it
understand what to do
Hi,
The build-in map functions looks quite nice but it requests the
iterables to be of the same length or otherwises will file with None
(most of time fails the function). Just wondering if there are already
enhancement work done with it?
I did some simple code but it will handle list without
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:00:23 -0800, Patrick wrote:
Hi,
The build-in map functions looks quite nice but it requests the
iterables to be of the same length or otherwises will file with None
(most of time fails the function). Just wondering if there are already
enhancement work done
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:55:50 -0500, Gerald Britton wrote:
So, what's the feeling out there? Go with map and the operators or
stick with the list comps?
Stick to whatever feels and reads better at the time.
Unless you have profiled your code, and determined that the map or list
comp
Generally, I prefer map() over list comprehensions since they are more
succinct and run faster for non-trivial examples. However, I've been
considering another use case related to functions in the operator
module. Here are some examples:
[x.method() for x in data]
[x[0] for x in data]
[x.attr
Is there a way to map Linux locale codes to Windows locale codes?
Windows has locale codes like 'Spanish_Mexico'. We would like to
use the more ISO compliant 'es_MX' locale format under Windows.
Is there a resource or API that might help us with this mapping?
Babel is not an option for us since
you should do is to make up a dict with known LCID's and their
corresponding language codes. I don't know of any way to do this
automatically in python...
Take a look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb896001.aspx
2010/12/14 pyt...@bdurham.com
Is there a way to map Linux locale codes
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Committed what was left applicable of the patch in r87020.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1513299
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1513299
___
___
New submission from Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
Apparently a 2.x to 3.x migration artifact. Canvas.coords() is documented as
returning a list:
def coords(self, *args):
Return a list of coordinates for the item given in ARGS.
but in 3.x it returns a map
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
resolution: - duplicate
stage: unit test needed - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
superseder: - changed return type from tkinter.Canvas.coords
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
msg69981 refers to #3390 which was closed fixed for has_key. As this is
similar could this go into 3.2 subject to acceptance? The patch file is really
a list of one line changes to get rid of map.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
I'll have a look.
--
assignee: anthonybaxter - georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1513299
___
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
Ruby has a very nice map
I'm thrilled for them. Personally I think the syntax is horrible.
I concur!
--James
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Everyone knows i'm a Python fanboy so nobody can call me a troll for
this...
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow why
even bother putting it in the language? And secondly, the total girl-
man weakness of lambda renders it completely mute!
Ruby has a very nice map
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:16 AM, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
So can anyone explain this poor excuse for a map function? Maybe GVR
should have taken it out in 3.0? *scratches head*
Let me get this straight... You're complaining about some trivial
code you've written and a 0.002
On Jun 6, 2010, at 5:16 PM, rantingrick wrote:
Everyone knows i'm a Python fanboy so nobody can call me a troll for
this...
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow why
even bother putting it in the language? And secondly, the total girl-
man weakness of lambda renders
rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow why
even bother putting it in the language? And secondly, the total girl-
man weakness of lambda renders it completely mute!
Do you realise that you don't have to use lambda? If you need
rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com writes:
Python map is just completely useless. [...]
import time
def test1():
l = range(1)
t1 = time.time()
map(lambda x:x+1, l)
t2= time.time()
print t2-t1
def test2():
l = range(1)
t1 = time.time
map is not needed. LC is great :D
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alain Ketterlin
al...@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr wrote:
rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com writes:
Python map is just completely useless. [...]
import time
def test1():
l = range(1)
t1 = time.time
On Jun 6, 12:02 pm, Alain Ketterlin al...@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr
wrote:
rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com writes:
I've not used map since I learned about list comprehensions.
Thats has been my experienced also. Actually i've been at Python for
O... about 2 years now and i don't think i've ever
On 06/07/10 03:22, rantingrick wrote:
On Jun 6, 12:02 pm, Alain Ketterlin al...@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr
wrote:
rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com writes:
I've not used map since I learned about list comprehensions.
Thats has been my experienced also. Actually i've been at Python for
O
On 06/06/2010 05:16 PM, rantingrick wrote:
So can anyone explain this poor excuse for a map function? Maybe GVR
should have taken it out in 3.0? *scratches head*
Speaking of Py3k: map no longer builds lists. What once was map is no
more, what once was itertools.imap is now map.
Sometimes
Python's map has the useful feature that nobody is in any doubt about
what it does. I don't know much about Ruby I have to say but looking
at that piece of syntax you gave I had no idea how to interpret it.
Anyway, I looked it up.
Calling an method on each of a collection of objects is best
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:27:43 +1000
Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
In the most naive uses, map appears to have no advantage over list
comprehension; but one thing that map can do that list comprehension
still can't do without a walk around the park:
def foo(func, args):
g = lambda x
On 06/07/10 05:54, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:27:43 +1000
Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
In the most naive uses, map appears to have no advantage over list
comprehension; but one thing that map can do that list comprehension
still can't do without a walk around
On Jun 6, 2:48 pm, Richard Thomas chards...@gmail.com wrote:
Python's map has the useful feature that nobody is in any doubt about
what it does. I don't know much about Ruby I have to say but looking
at that piece of syntax you gave I had no idea how to interpret it.
Anyway, I looked it up
On 6/6/2010 11:16 AM, rantingrick wrote:
Everyone knows i'm a Python fanboy so nobody can call me a troll for
this...
Non sequitor. It depends on your intention in posting this...
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow
Posting invalid speed comparisons stacked
tests don't measure what you think they are measuring and
consequently your results are invalid. Read on.
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow why even
bother putting it in the language? And secondly, the total girl- man
weakness of lambda renders it completely mute
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:59:02 +1000
Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
foo = lambda x: [y + 1 for y in x]
[foo(x) for x in [[4, 6, 3], [6, 3, 2], [1, 3, 5]]]
Didn't seem like such a long walk.
that's because you're simplifying the problem, the correct walk is:
Well, since it gives
result as the original solution.
def solution(lst):
# make changes here only
return foo(map, lst)
def foo(func, args):
g = lambda x: x+1
return [func(g, x) for x in args]
import unittest
@unittest.FunctionTestCase
def test():
lst = [[4, 6, 3], [6, 3, 2], [1, 3, 5]]
ans = [[5
is a
homework assignment, not a real requirements specification.
def solution(lst):
# make changes here only
return foo(map, lst)
OK, so I can make changes here. My change would not use foo.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@druid.net | Democracy is three wolves
http
, your post only came off as slightly trollish, so you have
that.
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow why
even bother putting it in the language? And secondly, the total girl-
man weakness of lambda renders it completely mute!
Ruby has a very nice map
[1,2,3].map
Reedy
Python map is just completely useless. For one it so damn slow why even
bother putting it in the language? And secondly, the total girl- man
weakness of lambda renders it completely mute!
Four trolls in three sentences. Way to go fanboy.
(1) Completely useless? It can't do *anything
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Hye-Shik, could you please comment on this ?
The Windows version appears to replace private use code points with CJK
compatibility idiographs, ie. uses standard Unicode code points rather than
private escape code points (for round-trip
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +haypo, lemburg
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7983
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7983
___
___
of writing the following without using zip:
map(lambda (id,v):id*v,zip(range(len(L)),L))
I wonder whether there is something like mapInd in Oz
(http://www.mozart-oz.org/documentation/base/list.html) so that you can
pass a binary function to map and refer to the index of the element
Luis Quesada l.ques...@4c.ucc.ie wrote:
Is there a way
of writing the following without using zip:
map(lambda (id,v):id*v,zip(range(len(L)),L))
[ id*v for id,v in enumerate(L) ]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Duncan Booth wrote:
Luis Quesada l.ques...@4c.ucc.ie wrote:
Is there a way
of writing the following without using zip:
map(lambda (id,v):id*v,zip(range(len(L)),L))
[ id*v for id,v in enumerate(L) ]
Cool! Thanks!
Cheers,
Luis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Luis Quesada l.ques...@4c.ucc.ie writes:
[ id*v for id,v in enumerate(L) ]
Cool! Thanks!
If you really want to write that in pointfree style (untested):
import itertools, operator
...
itertools.starmap(operator.mul, enumerate(L))
For your other question, you could probably do
Paul Rubin wrote:
Luis Quesada l.ques...@4c.ucc.ie writes:
[ id*v for id,v in enumerate(L) ]
Cool! Thanks!
If you really want to write that in pointfree style (untested):
import itertools, operator
...
itertools.starmap(operator.mul, enumerate(L))
For your other question, you
map(list, imap(itemgetter(1), gb))
===
words.txt:
===
Word Aligned
three
space sensitive programming
Feed Logo tins
Essential Python post Reading List
stop course there
times isnt
capes
===
Now, when I execute above, it works:
[['capes', 'space'], ['aligned'], ['reading'], ['essential
=sorted)
gb = groupby(sw, sorted)
print map(list, imap(itemgetter(1), gb))
===
words.txt:
===
Word Aligned
three
space sensitive programming
Feed Logo tins
Essential Python post Reading List
stop course there
times isnt
capes
===
Now, when I execute above, it works:
[['capes
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:35:51 -, Gary Herron gher...@digipen.edu
wrote:
spike wrote:
On Feb 8, 1:35 pm, Gary Herron gher...@islandtraining.com wrote:
spike wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen
Carl Banks wrote:
On Feb 8, 12:20 pm, spike pwashingto...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under
History:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very helpful for all
I use this one:
Begin
|
|
V
Start Mail client
|
|
V
Ask python-list -+
| |
| |
Vwhat a bunch of dumbass wait 2 min|
| |
| | No.
V |
Did you get any answer
spike wrote:
On Feb 8, 1:35 pm, Gary Herron gher...@islandtraining.com wrote:
spike wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under History:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very
501 - 600 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo
