Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or flow chart?
An example can be seen here on the right: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
This would be very helpful for users.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under History:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very helpful for all users.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
spike wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under History:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very helpful for all users.
Huh??? What aspect of Python were you thinking
On Feb 8, 12:20 pm, spike pwashingto...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under
History:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very helpful for all users.
Begin
On Feb 8, 1:35 pm, Gary Herron gher...@islandtraining.com wrote:
spike wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under History:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very helpful
On Feb 8, 1:35 pm, Gary Herron gher...@islandtraining.com wrote:
spike wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under History:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
This would be very helpful
spike wrote:
On Feb 8, 1:35 pm, Gary Herron gher...@islandtraining.com wrote:
spike wrote:
Has anyone been able to come across a Python logic map or Python logic
flow chart?
An example can be seen on the right under History:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet#History
to the dictionary and making it work? In the first set
of code I don't reference the map at all but it still seems to know where to
look? I am considerably new to Python
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Randy Belt wrote:
I have a small test program written trying to set up a dictionary that
points keys to functions. It is working. However, in the process of
creating it I noticed a weird problem. The problem is that this IS
WORKING and I think it shouldn't be.
~ Here is the input config
']
Is this defaulting to the dictionary and making it work? In the first set
of code I don't reference the map at all but it still seems to know where to
look? I am considerably new to Python
I don't blame you for being confused. You're doing two things wrong
which has the side effect of making it seem
Alexander Belchenko bia...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
As the author of original patch I want to note that it seems your merged
patch does not update the documentation (list of standard encodings).
Please, update the docs as well.
--
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think it is, see r74006 and
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/codecs.html#standard-encodings
(this is the doc for the future 2.7 version)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Alexander Belchenko bia...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
OK, thanks.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1616979
___
___
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:43:45 -0600, Robert Kern wrote:
Or use the appropriate libraries:
from numpy import dot
scalar = dot(vec1, vec2)
Why would I want to use an already existing library that is fast, well-
written and well-supported, when I can toss together a
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:43:45 -0600, Robert Kern wrote:
from numpy import dot
scalar = dot(vec1, vec2)
Why would I want to use an already existing library that is fast,
well- written and well-supported, when I can toss
and express it accordingly. There's no need to
clutter the mind with extra name bindings and iteration keywords. They
won't make our idea any more clear.
dot_product = map(mul, vec1, vec2)
vs
dot_product = [a * b for a, b in zip(vec1, vec2)]
It's very clear, at least to me, what a dot
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:08:54 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:43:45 -0600, Robert Kern wrote:
from numpy import dot
scalar = dot(vec1, vec2)
Why would I want to use an already existing library that is fast,
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has a corresponding list
comprehension. (Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’
operation that doesn't have a correspondingly simple list
comprehension?)
Try turning this into a list comprehension:
vectorsum = lambda *args: map(sum, zip(*args
with extra name bindings and iteration keywords. They
won't make our idea any more clear.
dot_product = map(mul, vec1, vec2)
vs
dot_product = [a * b for a, b in zip(vec1, vec2)]
It's very clear, at least to me, what a dot-product is in this case.
Except it's not.
The dot product of two
of each element in a vector sequence.
What you need is to define a function dot-product, and not hijack the
name for a local value. Then the function's implementation is irrelevant
to you: it could use a list comp, or could use map, it could use a for-
loop, a while loop, recursion, or black
in this case. A dot product is simply the
multiplication of each element in a vector sequence.
What you need is to define a function dot-product, and not hijack the
name for a local value. Then the function's implementation is
irrelevant to you: it could use a list comp, or could use map
]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I
can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2, operandlist1, operandlist2)
Is there any reasonable way to do this via a list comprehension ?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Jon P. jbpe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to do:
resultlist = operandlist1 + operandlist2
where for example
operandlist1=[1,2,3,4,5]
operandlist2=[5,4,3,2,1]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I
can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:54:16 -0800, Jon P. wrote:
I'd like to do:
resultlist = operandlist1 + operandlist2
where for example
operandlist1=[1,2,3,4,5]
operandlist2=[5,4,3,2,1]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2
Jon P. jbpe...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to do:
resultlist = operandlist1 + operandlist2
where for example
operandlist1=[1,2,3,4,5]
operandlist2=[5,4,3,2,1]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I
can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2, operandlist1, operandlist2
original lists).
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2, operandlist1, operandlist2)
Is there any reasonable way to do this via a list comprehension ?
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has a corresponding list
comprehension. (Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’
operation that doesn't
Ben Finney a écrit :
(snip)
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has a corresponding list
comprehension.
Right AFAICT, but:
(Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’
operation that doesn't have a correspondingly simple list
comprehension?)
... depends on your definition of simple
Steven D'Aprano steven at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au writes:
operandlist1=[1,2,3,4,5]
operandlist2=[5,4,3,2,1]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2, operandlist1, operandlist2)
If the two lists are very large
Steven D'Aprano schrieb:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:54:16 -0800, Jon P. wrote:
I'd like to do:
resultlist = operandlist1 + operandlist2
where for example
operandlist1=[1,2,3,4,5]
operandlist2=[5,4,3,2,1]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1
Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid writes:
Ben Finney a écrit :
(Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’ operation that
doesn't have a correspondingly simple list comprehension?)
... depends on your definition of simple. There are things I'd
rather
Ben Finney a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid writes:
Ben Finney a écrit :
(Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’ operation that
doesn't have a correspondingly simple list comprehension?)
... depends on your definition of simple
]. Using map(), I can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2, operandlist1, operandlist2)
If the two lists are very large, it would be faster to use this:
from operator import add
map(add, operandlist1, operandlist2)
This is the best solution so far.
Is there any reasonable way to do this via
J Kenneth King ja...@agentultra.com writes:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
from operator import add
map(add, operandlist1, operandlist2)
This is the best solution so far.
Strange to say it's a solution, when it doesn't solve the stated
problem: to replace
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:14:05 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
J Kenneth King ja...@agentultra.com writes:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au writes:
from operator import add
map(add, operandlist1, operandlist2)
This is the best solution so far.
Strange to say it's
‘resultlist’ to a new list that is the *concatenation* of the two
original lists).
True, but it is valid mathematical syntax if you interpret lists as
vectors. I'm sure there are languages where [1,2]+[3,4] will return
[4,6]. Possibly R or Mathematica?
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has
On the other hand, list comps using an if clause can't be written as pure
maps. You can do this:
[func(x) for x in seq if cond(x)]
filter(cond, map(func, seq))
but the second version may use much more temporary memory if seq is huge
and cond very rarely true.
You could use ifilter, imap
Try turning this into a list comprehension:
vectorsum = lambda *args: map(sum, zip(*args))
vectorsum([1,2], [3,4], [5,6])
-[9, 12]
vectorsum([1,2], [3,4], [5,6], [7,8])
-[16, 20]
Nvm, it's actually easy:
vectorsum = lambda *args: [sum(i) for i in zip(*args)]
--
http
]. Possibly R or Mathematica?
Python isn't one of them, which is why I cautioned strongly against
presenting it that way in this forum.
Everyone forgets the multiple argument form of map.
map(func, s1, s2, s3, ...)
would need to be written as:
[func(t) for f in itertools.izip_longest(s1, s2, s3
Anh Hai Trinh anh.hai.tr...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has a corresponding list
comprehension. (Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’
operation that doesn't have a correspondingly simple list
comprehension?)
Try turning this into a list
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:06:51 -0800, Anh Hai Trinh wrote:
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has a corresponding list
comprehension. (Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’
operation that doesn't have a correspondingly simple list
comprehension?)
Try turning this into a list
On Nov 2, 9:01 pm, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Anh Hai Trinh anh.hai.tr...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, just about any ‘map()’ operation has a corresponding list
comprehension. (Does anyone know of a counter-example, a ‘map()’
operation that doesn't have a correspondingly
I'd like to do:
resultlist = operandlist1 + operandlist2
where for example
operandlist1=[1,2,3,4,5]
operandlist2=[5,4,3,2,1]
and resultlist will become [6,6,6,6,6]. Using map(), I
can do:
map(lambda op1,op2: op1 + op2, operandlist1, operandlist2)
Is there any reasonable way to do this via
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
I dare to disagree on this being an adequate fix. Request to reopen.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7203
___
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2009/10/27 Florian Mayer rep...@bugs.python.org:
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
I dare to disagree on this being an adequate fix. Request to reopen.
What would you prefer?
--
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
At least converting
map(None, a, b, ...)
to
map(lambda *xs: xs, a, b, ...)
I can understand if you prefer not to add the itertools.zip_longest
workaround, although that would be the correct translation, of course
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2009/10/27 Florian Mayer rep...@bugs.python.org:
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
At least converting
map(None, a, b, ...)
to
map(lambda *xs: xs, a, b, ...)
Well, since that's not always correct, we should
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
When could this possibly be wrong, if I may ask?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7203
___
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
Fixed in r75734.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7203
New submission from Georg Brandl ge...@python.org:
Currently, ``map(None, a)`` is recognized and converted to ``list(a)``
which is correct but quite useless.
``map(None, a, b, ...)`` is not treated specially. An approximate
translation would be ``map(lambda *xs: xs, a, b, ...)`` which however
Changes by Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com:
--
nosy: +segfaulthunter
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7203
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Florian Mayer florma...@aim.com added the comment:
A full fix would be
list(map(fun, *zip(*itertools.zip_longest(a, b, ...
and if fun is None
list(map(lambda *xs: xs, *zip(*itertools.zip_longest(a, b, ...
--
___
Python tracker rep
], a
[16], process 1 with elements a[1], a[9], a[17], and so forth.
Rather, I would like all tasks to be put into a queue, and I would
like the processes to each time grab the next task to be done, and do
it. This would ensure fairly equal loading.
My question is: does the map() method of Pool pre
on.
Don't know if this rant makes any sense...
- Hendrik
in my own defense - firstly, I was able to implement what I wanted to
do with loops, and I used this to solve the problem I needed to.
However, by asking *why* map didn't work, I now understand how map
works, what contexts it may indeed
such clear questions as you did, it would be
an even greater pleasure to participate in than it is.
However, by asking *why* map didn't work, I now understand how map
works, what contexts it may indeed be useful for, and what the
alternatives are. To boot, you have all given me about 10
Piet van Oostrum p...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
[myFunc(elt, 'booHoo') for elt in myList] is also a good candidate and
in this case I think it is preferable to both the loop and the map with
a partial or lambda in terms of clarity.
From memory, a listcomp with a non-builtin function is also faster
than
Another possibilities, if you really *desire* to use map()
and not list-comprehension (I'd prefer the latter), are:
# Python 2.x:
map(func, mylist, itertools.repeat('booHoo', len(mylist)))
# Python 3.x, where map() works like Py2.x's itertools.imap():
list(map(func, mylist, itertools.repeat
On Monday 31 August 2009 06:55:52 elsa wrote:
8 - map question
(Ultimately, I want to call myFunc(myList[0], 'booHoo'), myFunc(myList
[1], 'booHoo'), myFunc(myList[2], 'booHoo') etc. However, I might want
to call myFunc(myList[0], 'woo'), myFunc(myList[1
(myList[0], 'woo'), myFunc(myList[1], 'woo'), myFunc
(myList[2], 'woo') some other time).
Here is some heretical advice:
Do not use stuff like map and reduce unless they fit what you want to do
perfectly, and JustWorks the first time.
I think of that advice as orthodox, not heretical! (functional
Hendrik van Rooyen hend...@microcorp.co.za (HvR) wrote:
HvR On Monday 31 August 2009 06:55:52 elsa wrote:
HvR 8 - map question
(Ultimately, I want to call myFunc(myList[0], 'booHoo'), myFunc(myList
[1], 'booHoo'), myFunc(myList[2], 'booHoo') etc. However
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:43:07 +0200, Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
Here is some heretical advice:
Do not use stuff like map and reduce unless they fit what you want to do
perfectly, and JustWorks the first time.
You have a very clear idea of what you want to do, so why do you not
just simply
On Monday 31 August 2009 11:31:34 Piet van Oostrum wrote:
But ultimately it is also very much a matter of taste, preference and
habit.
This is true, but there is another reason that I posted - I have noticed that
there seems to be a tendency amongst newcomers to the group to go to great
elsa kerensael...@hotmail.com writes:
map(myFunc(b='booHoo'), myList)
Why doesn't this work? is there a way to make it work?
You can use functools.partial but a listcomp might be simpler:
list(myfunc(a, b='booHoo') for a in myList)
There is another listcomp syntax with square brackets
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:55:52 -0700, elsa wrote:
say I have a list, myList. Now say I have a function with more than
one argument:
myFunc(a, b='None')
now, say I want to map myFunc onto myList, with always the same
argument for b, but iterating over a:
map(myFunc(b='booHoo'), myList
Hi,
i have a question about the built in map function. Here 'tis:
say I have a list, myList. Now say I have a function with more than
one argument:
myFunc(a, b='None')
now, say I want to map myFunc onto myList, with always the same
argument for b, but iterating over a:
map(myFunc(b='booHoo
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, elsakerensael...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i have a question about the built in map function. Here 'tis:
say I have a list, myList. Now say I have a function with more than
one argument:
myFunc(a, b='None')
now, say I want to map myFunc onto myList
On 08/30/2009 10:55 PM, elsa wrote:
i have a question about the built in map function. Here 'tis:
say I have a list, myList. Now say I have a function with more than
one argument:
myFunc(a, b='None')
now, say I want to map myFunc onto myList, with always the same
argument for b
elsa kerensael...@hotmail.com:
now, say I want to map myFunc onto myList, with always the same
argument for b, but iterating over a:
from functools import partial
def g(x,y=1): return x+y
...
map(partial(g,y=2),[1,2])
[3, 4]
map(partial(g,y=42),[1,2])
[43, 44]
--
Wir danken für die
Dear All,
I'm trying to calculate shortest paths on US highway map. I understand how
shortest path algorithms work in Python but I need helps to do it on real
maps. How can I make link-node information?
Best,
John
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
The codec file now starts with the comment:
Python Character Mapping Codec cp720 generated on Windows:
Vista 6.0.6002 SP2 Multiprocessor Free with the command:
python Tools/unicode/genwincodec.py 720
I also added a file
Abdulmonem dubais...@gmail.com added the comment:
As a user I experienced this bug. With python 3.1, the interpreter
terminate with fatal error:
Py_Initialize: can't initialize sys standard streams
LookupError: unknown encoding: cp720
I think, this can be replicated by changing the active
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Instead of using another source of third-party files, I suggest to use the
Windows
functions to generate the mapping.
The attached patch contains a script, genwincodec.py, which uses
MultiByteToWideChar
and generates a codec file.
I
Changes by Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14490/genwincodec-py3k.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1616979
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Amaury: your approach sounds fine to me, please apply.
--
resolution: - accepted
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1616979
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Reconsidering, I'd like to ask for two changes:
- please record the command(s) used to generate tables on Windows
somewhere, in either Tools/unicode/Makefile, or a separate batch file.
- please arrange for the doc string of the generated file
On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:29:21 -0300, Philip Semanchuk
phi...@semanchuk.com escribió:
On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
I can't figure out how to map a C variable of size_t via Python's
ctypes
Hi all,
I can't figure out how to map a C variable of size_t via Python's
ctypes module. Let's say I have a C function like this:
void populate_big_array(double *the_array, size_t element_count) {...}
How would I pass parameter 2? A long (or ulong) will (probably) work
(on most platforms
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
Hi all,
I can't figure out how to map a C variable of size_t via Python's
ctypes module. Let's say I have a C function like this:
void populate_big_array(double *the_array, size_t element_count) {...}
How would I pass parameter 2? A long (or ulong) will (probably
On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
Hi all,
I can't figure out how to map a C variable of size_t via Python's
ctypes module. Let's say I have a C function like this:
void populate_big_array(double *the_array, size_t element_count)
{...}
How would
En Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:29:21 -0300, Philip Semanchuk
phi...@semanchuk.com escribió:
On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
I can't figure out how to map a C variable of size_t via Python's
ctypes module.
from ctypes import c_size_t
D'oh! [slaps
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Unpickling e.g. StringIO objects doesn't seem to work:
s = pickle.load(open(stringio.pickle, rb))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File /home/antoine/py3k/picklecompat-6137/Lib/pickle.py, line 1351,
in load
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
An improved patch with tests.
It has no tests for fix_imports=False, though.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14175/compat_pickle2.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
A new patch which also includes reverse mappings, so that protocol = 2
pickles created with 3.x can also work under 2.x.
(that is, it also solves #3675)
--
dependencies: +Python 2.6 can't read sets pickled with Python 3.0
Added file:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Updated patch with a couple of documentation and function prototype fixes.
--
dependencies: -Python 2.6 can't read sets pickled with Python 3.0
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14178/compat_pickle4.diff
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Sorry, last patch had a couple of minor issues
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14179/compat_pickle5.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6137
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14177/compat_pickle3.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6137
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14178/compat_pickle4.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6137
___
Matthias Kievernagel mkie...@web.de added the comment:
Applied the patch
http://bugs.python.org/file14124/compat_pickle.diff
to rev. 73106.
Patch applies fine, 'make test' passes
and it solves my problem.
(which is far from a complete test case though
- only 5 small pickles)
Thanks,
Matthias
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Some comments on the patch:
- I don't understand why you create a static twotuple object rather
than simply using Py_BuildValue((OO), ...). Mutating tuples is bad.
- I don't think you need to call PyDict_Contains() before
PyDict_GetItem(). The
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
components: +Library (Lib) -None
priority: - critical
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6137
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
If I understood correctly, #3675 is about making pickle data generated
by Python 3 readable by Python 2.
Only if a protocol = 2 is specified. Therefore it seems it's only a
matter of translating module names.
--
Alexandre Vassalotti alexan...@peadrop.com added the comment:
If I understood correctly, #3675 is about making pickle data generated
by Python 3 readable by Python 2. However, this issue is about
compatibility in the other direction—i.e., making Python 2 pickles
readable by Python 3, which is
://bugs.python.org/issue3799#msg76196
Could not find an issue opened for this though.
So I'm opening one.
Regards,
Matthias Kievernagel
--
components: None
messages: 88470
nosy: mkiever
severity: normal
status: open
title: Pickle migration: Should pickle map copy_reg to copyreg?
versions: Python
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
#3675 is a similar issue, too bad nothing could be done to solve it...
--
nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti, pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6137
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - patch review
type: - feature request
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1513299
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
components: +Unicode -None
stage: - test needed
type: - feature request
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1616979
(Resend, because of funny error message:
Your mail to 'Python-list' with the subject
Iterating over readlines() and map()
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
Whatever this means.)
Hi,
if I understand correctly, this code would not read the complete file
W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
(Resend, because of funny error message:
Your mail to 'Python-list' with the subject
Iterating over readlines() and map()
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
Whatever this means.)
Hi,
if I understand correctly, this code
On 2009-03-26 01:41, Christian Heimes wrote:
No, you are wrong. file.readlines() reads the entire file into memory
and returns a list of strings. If you want to iterate over the lines of
a text file you can simply write:
for line in myfile:
dosomethingwith(line)
It won't work for a
Hi,
if I understand correctly, this code would not read the complete file
into the memory:
for line in myfile.readlines():
dosomethingwith(line)
Is this also true for this code?
for line in map(myfunction, myfile.readlines()):
dosomethingwith(line)
Or would use of map() mean
On Mar 26, 10:27 am, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote:
Is this also true for this code?
for line in map(myfunction, myfile.readlines()):
dosomethingwith(line)
Or would use of map() mean, that the complete myfile is read into
the RAM?
As Christian explained, you're really
601 - 700 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo
