On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 01:26:43 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:20:09 -0700, gengyangcai wrote:
>
>> I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by
>> typing print "Game Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : inval
On 22/09/2012 02:26, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:20:09 -0700, gengyangcai wrote:
I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by
typing print "Game Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : invalid syntax
". Any ideas on what the prob
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:20:09 -0700, gengyangcai wrote:
> I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by
> typing print "Game Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : invalid syntax
> ". Any ideas on what the problem is and how to resolve it ?
N
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Alister wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:54:14 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Rodrick Brown
>> wrote:
>>> Go away troll!
>>
>> Troll? It looked like a sincere question to me.
>
> but one that page 1 of the documentation would answer.
In
gengyang...@gmail.com writes:
> I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by
> typing print "Game Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : invalid syntax ".
> Any ideas on what the problem is and how to resolve it ? Thanks a lot .
In python
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:54:14 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Rodrick Brown
> wrote:
>> Go away troll!
>
> Troll? It looked like a sincere question to me.
but one that page 1 of the documentation would answer.
--
Waste not, get your budget cut next year.
--
http:/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> Go away troll!
Troll? It looked like a sincere question to me.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Go away troll!
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2012, at 4:27 PM, "gengyang...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hello ,
>
>
> I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by typing
> print "Game Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : invalid syntax
On 9/21/12 10:20 PM, gengyang...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello ,
I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by typing print "Game
Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : invalid syntax ". Any ideas on what the
problem is and how to resolve it ? Thanks a
Hello ,
I am currently using Python 3.2.3 . WHen I use the print function by typing
print "Game Over" , it mentions " SyntaxError : invalid syntax ". Any ideas
on what the problem is and how to resolve it ? Thanks a lot .
GengYang
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
> e.g. I have a line:-
>
> print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
>
> fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
> print fails when it isn't
n
searching for several hours but no joy...
Thanks. Jamie
===
cursor.execute("select * from project")
row = cursor.fetchone()
if row:
print row
I'd like to actually see SQL
output here?)
Try this:
>>> results
Thanks. Jamie
===
>>> cursor.execute("select * from project")
row = cursor.fetchone()
if row:
print row
I'd like to actually see SQL
output here?)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 9/10/2012 2:33 AM, Dwight Hutto wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Ian Foote mailto:i...@feete.org>> wrote:
On 09/09/12 14:23, iMath wrote:
在 2012年3月26日星期一UTC+8下午7时45分26秒，__iMath写道：
I know the print statement produces the same result when
b
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Dwight Hutto wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Ian Foote wrote:
>>
>> On 09/09/12 14:23, iMath wrote:
>>>
>>> 在 2012年3月26日星期一UTC+8下午7时45分26秒，iMath写道：
>>>>
>>>> I know the print
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Ian Foote wrote:
> On 09/09/12 14:23, iMath wrote:
>
>> 在 2012年3月26日星期一UTC+8下午7时45分26秒，**iMath写道：
>>
>>> I know the print statement produces the same result when both of these
>>> two instructions are executed ,I just
On 09/09/12 14:23, iMath wrote:
在 2012年3月26日星期一UTC+8下午7时45分26秒，iMath写道：
I know the print statement produces the same result when both of these two
instructions are executed ,I just want to know Is there any difference between
print 3 and print '3' in Python ?
thx everyone
The dif
在 2012年3月26日星期一UTC+8下午7时45分26秒，iMath写道：
> I know the print statement produces the same result when both of these two
> instructions are executed ,I just want to know Is there any difference
> between print 3 and print '3' in Python ?
thx everyone
--
http://mail.python.o
>
> Yes, a I said a simple len(fld) will tell me if fld[2] 'exists' but it
> gets messy if I have to do it in the middle of the print sequence.
>
>
>> But perhaps there's another approach. Just what DO you want to print if
>> fld(1) exists, but fld(2) does
sts' but it
gets messy if I have to do it in the middle of the print sequence.
> But perhaps there's another approach. Just what DO you want to print if
> fld(1) exists, but fld(2) does not? Do you still want to print out day,
> fld(1), and balance? Or do you want to skip b
In article <9s4nh9-8dr@chris.zbmc.eu>, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
> e.g. I have a line:-
>
> print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
>
> fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of
On 6/09/12 19:59:05, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
> e.g. I have a line:-
>
> print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
>
> fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
> print fai
On 6 September 2012 18:59, wrote:
> I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
> e.g. I have a line:-
>
> print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
>
> fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
> print fails when it isn
On 9/6/2012 1:59 PM, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
e.g. I have a line:-
print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
print fails when it isn't set.
Wha
On 9/6/2012 10:01 AM, David Hoese wrote:
On 9/5/12 3:03 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-09-05, Dave Angel wrote:
>On 09/05/2012 01:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>Making the site's "search" box use Google or somesuch is probably the
>>simplest solution. I'm not enough of a web guy to know ho
On 06/09/2012 15:01, David Hoese wrote:
On 9/5/12 3:03 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-09-05, Dave Angel wrote:
>On 09/05/2012 01:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>Making the site's "search" box use Google or somesuch is probably the
>>simplest solution. I'm not enough of a web guy to know how
On 09/06/2012 01:59 PM, tinn...@isbd.co.uk wrote:
> I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
> e.g. I have a line:-
>
> print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
>
> fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
> print fail
On 9/6/2012 10:59 AM tinn...@isbd.co.uk said...
I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
e.g. I have a line:-
print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
print fails when it isn't set.
I kn
I want to print a series of list elements some of which may not exist,
e.g. I have a line:-
print day, fld[1], balance, fld[2]
fld[2] doesn't always exist (fld is the result of a split) so the
print fails when it isn't set.
I know I could simply use an if but ultimately there m
On 9/5/12 3:03 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-09-05, Dave Angel wrote:
>On 09/05/2012 01:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>Making the site's "search" box use Google or somesuch is probably the
>>simplest solution. I'm not enough of a web guy to know how to do
>>that, but I do know that some si
On Thursday, 6 September 2012 01:54:45 UTC+5:30, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:03:16 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9/5/2012 8:45 AM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > These ever increasing extra blank lines with each quote are obnoxious.
>
> > Consider using a n
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:03:16 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/5/2012 8:45 AM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> These ever increasing extra blank lines with each quote are obnoxious.
> Consider using a news reader with news.gmane.org instead of google crap.
> Or snip heavily.
+1. And the duplicated post
2000$ for 500,000 searches per year and 750$ for
150,000 searches so its quite expensive.
Also the print function only comes in the third result (python 3.2)
if you search for "site:docs.python.org/release/3.2 print" the print function
is not found at all.
I think a specialized algor
^^^^^^
| References: <50464153.5090...@gmail.com>
| Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:27:35 -0400
| Subject: Re: python docs search for 'print'
| From: Joel Goldstick
| To: David Hoese
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
| Cc: python-l
On 2012-09-05, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 01:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Making the site's "search" box use Google or somesuch is probably the
>> simplest solution. I'm not enough of a web guy to know how to do
>> that, but I do know that some sites do handle site search that way.
>>
>
On 09/05/2012 01:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2012-09-05, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 9/4/2012 11:22 PM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
>>
>>> I was actually planning to write a bug on this.
>> If you do, find the right place to submit it.
>> bugs.python.org is for issues relating to the cpython reposito
On 2012-09-05, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:22 PM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
>
>> I was actually planning to write a bug on this.
>
> If you do, find the right place to submit it.
> bugs.python.org is for issues relating to the cpython repository.'
> I fairly sure that the website search code
ve the way to do the easy setup, with that constraint, that would
>
> be a positive suggestion, accepted or not.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Terry Jan Reedy
Google site search costs 2000$ for 500,000 searches per year and 750$ for
150,000 searches so its quite expensive.
Also the print function
On 9/5/2012 1:22 AM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 September 2012 09:35:43 UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
If you do find the right place, you should contribute something to an
improvement. The current search performance is not a secret, so mere
complaints are useless.
I was thinking
On Wednesday, 5 September 2012 09:35:43 UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 11:22 PM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
>
>
>
> > I was actually planning to write a bug on this.
>
>
>
> If you do, find the right place to submit it.
>
> bugs.python.org is for issues relating to the cpython repos
On 9/4/2012 11:22 PM, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
I was actually planning to write a bug on this.
If you do, find the right place to submit it.
bugs.python.org is for issues relating to the cpython repository.'
I fairly sure that the website search code is not there.
If you do find the right place
The generated code can be run without Python installed and does not embed
Python. For example:
print("Hello World to py2c!")
would be translated to
#include "iostream"
using namespace std; //If you want you can make py2c not add this and
use std::cout instead of cout
i
On Tuesday, 4 September 2012 23:29:26 UTC+5:30, David Hoese wrote:
> A friend made me aware of this:
>
> When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on
>
> docs.python.org, the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20
>
> results. T
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Gah! Brain meltdown! DDG does better on searches for Python terms with
> fewer extraneous meanings, e.g. "python print" finds many links about
> fashion, but https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=python+tuple is all about
> Python tuples :)
Addin
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:28:31 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> https://www.google.com.au/search?q=python+print
> http://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=python+print
>
> In this case, google hits the right Python documentation on the first
> link. Duckduckgo doesn't do nearly so wel
On 9/4/2012 6:32 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, David Hoese wrote:
A friend made me aware of this:
When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on
docs.python.org,
the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20 results.
In the Windo
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, David Hoese wrote:
A friend made me aware of this:
When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on docs.python.org,
the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20 results.
In the Windows Help version of the docs, enter print i
On 04/09/2012 19:38, William R. Wing (Bill Wing) wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012, at 1:58 PM, David Hoese wrote:
A friend made me aware of this:
When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on docs.python.org, the
print function doesn't even come up in the top 20 resu
On 2012-09-04, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, David Hoese wrote:
>> A friend made me aware of this:
>> When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on
>> docs.python.org, the print function doesn't even come up in the
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:27:38 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> ¹ The other mess they created (or allowed to be created) is this mashup
>of newsgroup and mailing list, neither of which works properly,
In what way do they not work properly?
>because
>the underlying protocols
On Sep 4, 2012, at 1:58 PM, David Hoese wrote:
> A friend made me aware of this:
> When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on docs.python.org,
> the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20 results. The print
> statement isn't even
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:58:43 -0400, David Hoese wrote:
> A friend made me aware of this:
> When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on
> docs.python.org, the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20
> results. The print statement isn't even
David Hoese wrote:
> A friend made me aware of this:
> When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on
> docs.python.org, the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20
> results. The print statement isn't even listed as far as I can tell.
>
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, David Hoese wrote:
> A friend made me aware of this:
> When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on docs.python.org,
> the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20 results.
> -Dave
> --
> http://mail.python
A friend made me aware of this:
When a python beginner (2.x) quick searches for "print" on
docs.python.org, the print function doesn't even come up in the top 20
results. The print statement isn't even listed as far as I can tell.
Is there something that can be done a
02/2012 03:34 PM, gwhite wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> btw, I also thought the default "add a CR LF" to the end was odd too.
>> >>> But at least that one had a simple way out.
>> >> But it (print on Python 2.x) doesn't, unless you're stuck on Wind
n 09/02/2012 03:34 PM, gwhite wrote:
>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> btw, I also thought the default "add a CR LF" to the end was odd too.
> >> >>> But at least that one had a simple way out.
> >> >> But it (print on Python 2.x) doe
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:20 AM, gwhite wrote:
> I guess you're saying 3.x will just ignore:
>
> from __future__ import print_function
>
> I'll risk being silly, and thus ask: but what if when I get to 3.x
> there is no __future__, as it is now "present?" Do I need to strip
> out the line?
>
> Wha
;
> > I'm kinda thinking `write` is likely to be a little more "stable" than
> > `print` (if that is the right characterization) when my eventual
> > switch from 2.7 to 3.x happens. You think?
>
> If you're planning to switch, make use of __future__.
t; to the end was odd too.
>>> But at least that one had a simple way out.
>> But it (print on Python 2.x) doesn't, unless you're stuck on Windows.
>> And even then, you can prevent it by using a 'b' in the mode.
> Yes, I'm using windows. What is "
e more "stable" than
> `print` (if that is the right characterization) when my eventual
> switch from 2.7 to 3.x happens. You think?
If you're planning to switch, make use of __future__. It's
specifically to make that job easier. Once you have a future
declaration at the
On Sep 2, 1:49 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/2/2012 3:26 PM, gwhite wrote:
>
> > On the "rework" thing, yes, I suppose I could construct the line as a
> > single string prior to print. There would be things like `for`
> > loops and conditionals to do so. Th
believes it is positioned at the beginning of
> > a line."
>
> > So it is apparently doing what it is supposed to do.
>
> > Is there a way to stop this? Or is there a different function that
> > will only print what you have in the formatted string?
>
> E:\UserData\
lt "add a CR LF" to the end was odd too.
> >>> But at least that one had a simple way out.
> >> But it (print on Python 2.x) doesn't, unless you're stuck on Windows.
> >> And even then, you can prevent it by using a 'b' in the mode.
&g
On 9/2/2012 3:26 PM, gwhite wrote:
On the "rework" thing, yes, I suppose I could construct the line as a
single string prior to print.There would be things like `for`
loops and conditionals to do so. That isn't so unusual.
The usual idiom is to construct a list of piece
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 20:58, me wrote:
>>
>> Well you can convert the ints to str then concatenate them.
>>
>> print "1" + "2"
>>
>
> Please post other parts of the thread so people c
On 02/09/2012 20:58, me wrote:
Well you can convert the ints to str then concatenate them.
print "1" + "2"
Please post other parts of the thread so people can get the context or
don't bother posting at all, thanks.
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.py
On 09/02/2012 03:50 PM, gwhite wrote:
> On Sep 2, 12:43 pm, Dave Angel wrote:
>> On 09/02/2012 03:34 PM, gwhite wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> btw, I also thought the default "add a CR LF" to the end was odd too.
>>> But at least that one had a simple way
On Sep 2, 11:33 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/2/2012 1:23 PM, gwhite wrote:
>
> > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > behavior of the print function.
>
> >>>> print 1,;print 2,
> > 1 2
>
> You have di
Well you can convert the ints to str then concatenate them.
print "1" + "2"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 2, 12:43 pm, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 09/02/2012 03:34 PM, gwhite wrote:
>
> >
>
> > btw, I also thought the default "add a CR LF" to the end was odd too.
> > But at least that one had a simple way out.
>
> But it (print on Python 2.x) doesn&#x
Use repr()
print(repr(sum([.1, .1, .1, .1, .1, .1, .1, .1, .1, .1])))
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 2, 10:45 am, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:23 PM, gwhite wrote:
> > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > behavior of the print function.
>
> >>>> print 1,;print 2,
> > 1 2
>
&
On 09/02/2012 03:34 PM, gwhite wrote:
>
>
> btw, I also thought the default "add a CR LF" to the end was odd too.
> But at least that one had a simple way out.
But it (print on Python 2.x) doesn't, unless you're stuck on Windows.
And even then, you can preve
On Sep 2, 12:26 pm, gwhite wrote:
> On Sep 2, 10:55 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM, gwhite wrote:
> > > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > > b
On Sep 2, 10:55 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM, gwhite wrote:
> > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > behavior of the print function.
>
> >>>> print 1,;print 2,
> > 1 2
>
> &g
On Sep 2, 11:33 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/2/2012 1:23 PM, gwhite wrote:
>
> > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > behavior of the print function.
>
> >>>> print 1,;print 2,
> > 1 2
>
> You have di
On Sep 2, 10:55 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM, gwhite wrote:
> > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > behavior of the print function.
>
> >>>> print 1,;print 2,
> > 1 2
>
> &g
On Sep 2, 10:49 am, mblume wrote:
> Am Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:23:53 -0700 schrieb gwhite:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> > behavior of the print function.
>
> >>>>
On 9/2/2012 1:23 PM, gwhite wrote:
I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
behavior of the print function.
print 1,;print 2,
1 2
You have discovered why print is a function in 3.x.
>>> print(1, 2, sep='')
12
>>> print(1,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM, gwhite wrote:
> I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> behavior of the print function.
>
>>>> print 1,;print 2,
> 1 2
>
> See the space in between the 1 and the 2 at the output print to the
Am Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:23:53 -0700 schrieb gwhite:
> I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> behavior of the print function.
>
>>>> print 1,;print 2,
> 1 2
>
> See the space in between the 1 and the 2 at the output prin
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:23 PM, gwhite wrote:
> I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
> behavior of the print function.
>
>>>> print 1,;print 2,
> 1 2
>
> See the space in between the 1 and the 2 at the output print to the
On 02/09/2012 18:23, gwhite wrote:
I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
behavior of the print function.
print 1,;print 2,
1 2
See the space in between the 1 and the 2 at the output print to the
command console?
The help for print is:
"A spa
I can't figure out how to stop the "add a space at the beginning"
behavior of the print function.
>>> print 1,;print 2,
1 2
See the space in between the 1 and the 2 at the output print to the
command console?
The help for print is:
"A space is written before
On 24/08/12 21:59:12, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
> Also, print doesn't work inside a class.
It works for me:
> python3
Python 3.3.0a1 (v3.3.0a1:f1a9a6505731, Mar 4 2012, 12:26:12)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright",
ython-list-bounces+wbrucek=gmail@python.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Kaynor
Sent: August-24-12 12:54 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: help with simple print statement!
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Willem Krayenhoff mailto:wbru...@gmail.com> > wrote:
Any idea why print is
Prasad, Ramit wrote:
Willem Krayenhoff
Any idea why print isn't working here?
I tried restarting my Command prompt. Also, print doesn't work inside a class.
Ramit,
The standard for attribution is something along the lines of:
Prasad, Ramit wrote:
or
Willem Kayenhoff wr
Willem Krayenhoff
Any idea why print isn't working here?
I tried restarting my Command prompt. Also, print doesn't work inside a class.
--
Best Wishes,
Bruce
C: 604-441-5791
My Availability
Just as a note, this is a usenet group that can be accessed via ema
:
On 24 August 2012 15:43, Willem Krayenhoff wrote:
> Any idea why print isn't working here?
http://docs.python.org/release/3.0.1/whatsnew/3.0.html#print-is-a-function
Also, pasting images into emails to this list is unlikely to gain you
many friends ...
-[]z.
--
http://mail.py
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 12:43 -0700, Willem Krayenhoff wrote:
> Any idea why print isn't working here?
You're using Python 3.2, but trying Python 2.7 syntax -
http://docs.python.org/release/3.0.1/whatsnew/3.0.html#print-is-a-function
should explain the problem adequately.
(Incid
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Willem Krayenhoff wrote:
> Any idea why print isn't working here?
>
> I tried restarting my Command prompt. Also, print doesn't work inside a
> class.
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
In Python 3, print was made into a function rath
self.mb_err = MyBuffer()
def process(self, s):
sys.stdout, sys.stderr = self.mb_out, self.mb_err
more = self.push(s)
sys.stdout, sys.stderr = sys.__stdout__, sys.__stderr__
return self.mb_out.get(), self.mb_err.get(), more
print 'creating new interactive console'
mic
Not really. Try modifying ast.literal_eval. This will be quite secure.
On 17 August 2012 19:36, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Eric Frederich
> wrote:
> > Within the debugging console, after importing all of the bindings, there
> > would be no reason to import anythin
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Eric Frederich
wrote:
> Within the debugging console, after importing all of the bindings, there
> would be no reason to import anything whatsoever.
> With just the bindings I created and the Python language we could do
> meaningful debugging.
> So if I block the
What I wanted to implement was a debugging console that runs right on the
client rather than on the server.
You'd have to be logged into the application to do anything meaningful or
even start it up.
All of the C functions that I created bindings for respect the security of
the logged in user.
Wit
On Aug 17, 12:25 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> wrote:
> > There is already awesome protocols for running Python code remotely over
> > a network. Please do not re-invent the wheel without good reason.
>
> > See pyro, twisted, rpyc, rpclib, jpc,
o build your
protocol; you still don't need a read/eval/print loop to run across a
network.
Personally, I'm of the opinion that simple text-based protocols are
usually sufficient, and much easier to debug - heavier things like RPC
tend to be overkill. But as Alister pointed out, my main
3rd party software running on
>>> the server side.
>>> I can add client side extensions that communicate over some http / xml
>>> type requests.
>>> So I can define functions that take a string and return a string. I
>>> would like to get a simple read eval
hat communicate over some http / xml
>> type requests.
>> So I can define functions that take a string and return a string. I
>> would like to get a simple read eval print loop working.
>
> Let's stop *right there*. You're looking for something that will run on
>
801 - 900 of 2581 matches
Mail list logo
