Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Re: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Lee Cullens
Just an update Russel, I was getting bored going through the TextWrangler docs, and remembering that I had not even looked at the SubEthaEdit docs when I used it went back to check out what you said further. First, of course, such is something that can be set in the perfs and per document. I

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Re: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Mar 30, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Chris Barker wrote: I had looked at XCode So what is the story with XCode? Has Apple made it extensible and customizable enough that it could be made into a good general purpose IDE/editor? One thing that has always bugged me about all the IDEs I've even seen is th

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Re: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Chris Barker
I had looked at XCode So what is the story with XCode? Has Apple made it extensible and customizable enough that it could be made into a good general purpose IDE/editor? One thing that has always bugged me about all the IDEs I've even seen is that they are designed for a couple languages/compil

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Re: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Berkowitz
On 3/30/05 1:42 PM, "Russell E. Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > XCode takes forever to launch. It does? Takes about 1 second here. -- Paul Berkowitz ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Re: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Lee Cullens
On Mar 30, 2005, at 4:42 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lee Cullens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks François Not sure I want to get into eclipse just now but I referenced it for further study. I seem to remember blowing by SubEthaEdit already, but I went back and chec

[Pythonmac-SIG] Re: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lee Cullens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks François > > Not sure I want to get into eclipse just now but I referenced it for > further study. > > I seem to remember blowing by SubEthaEdit already, but I went back and > checked it out with Python IDE and it

[Pythonmac-SIG] Re: SPE-OSX

2005-03-30 Thread Kevin Walzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lee Cullens wrote: | Kevin, | | Thank you - I really wanted to try to work with SPE because it seems to | have more of what I want in a sandbox than the other packages I'm | playing with. | | From the SPE page - I already had MacPython Add-Ons and Blen

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] RE: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Lee Cullens
Thanks François Not sure I want to get into eclipse just now but I referenced it for further study. I seem to remember blowing by SubEthaEdit already, but I went back and checked it out with Python IDE and it is indeed a must have basic text editor. I was running into some problems between IDL

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] RE: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread François Granger
Le 30/03/05 9:42, « Lee Cullens » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > I'll let IDLE and SPE just sit there for the time being. Maybe I' get > back to SPE after Tiger and see if I can work with them to get it to > play well with Mac - we'll see where I'm at. I have been using Eclipse with Pydev plugi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] appscript and XXXX - what is my app instance returning?

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Berkowitz
On 3/30/05 6:06 AM, "has" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While appscript saves you from the vagaries of the AppleScript > language, it can't do anything about bugs and quirks in individual > applications' scripting interfaces. > > Remember that while appscript uses an OO-like syntax for convenience

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] SPE-OSX

2005-03-30 Thread Kevin Walzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark, | | 1. Invoking wxGlade or XRC from the Tools menu does not work. Simply | nothing happens. ~From the traceback, it doesn't look like you have SPE installed in the right place. The SPE-OSX folder needs to go in /Applications. There are paths to wx

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] SPE-OSX

2005-03-30 Thread Mark Phillips
On Mar 30, 2005, at 6:05 AM, Kevin Walzer wrote: -I'm the maintainer of SPE-OSX. You can e-mail me with questions at the address above, although I'm also subscribed to the PythonMac list. Hello, Kevin, Thanks for responding to Lee and for maintaining the SPE OSX site. It is nice to know you are in

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] RE: IDE recommendation

2005-03-30 Thread Mark Phillips
On Mar 29, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Lee Cullens wrote: Relative to my previous post : RE: SPE-OSX IDE with Python on Mac or others? I'm leery of SPE, so maybe a more general recommendation - an IDE I can "grow with" that has a significant user base, is still reasonably maintained (maybe even evolving).

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] appscript and XXXX - what is my app instance returning?

2005-03-30 Thread has
'me' wrote: I am having much fun with appscript and QuarkXpress6.x [...] Unfortunately, when you do get lost like I am. You're completely lost. While appscript saves you from the vagaries of the AppleScript language, it can't do anything about bugs and quirks in individual applications' scripti

[Pythonmac-SIG] SPE-OSX

2005-03-30 Thread Kevin Walzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lee, I'm the maintainer of SPE-OSX. You can e-mail me with questions at the address above, although I'm also subscribed to the PythonMac list. What version of wxPython are you using? I have not updated my build of SPE to work with the latest version:

[Pythonmac-SIG] appscript and XXXX - what is my app instance returning?

2005-03-30 Thread me
I am having much fun with appscript and QuarkXpress6.x The appscript module is such a fantastic piece of code. It lets novices wander right into the thick of AppleScript without requiring intimate knowledge of AppleScript's eccentricities. Unfortunately, when you do get lost like I am. You're compl