On 08/06/2021 17.35, Alex Bennée wrote:
Thomas Huth writes:
On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
Really w
On 6/8/21 11:01 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
Really what we want is to probe
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>
>>> On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
>>>
>>> Um, what?
>> Really what we want is
On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
Really what we want is to probe the -M (machines) that a binary
support
On 6/8/21 7:27 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
Really what we want is to probe the -M (machines) that a binary
supports
On 08/06/2021 16.41, Alex Bennée wrote:
Thomas Huth writes:
On 08/06/2021 15.42, John Snow wrote:
On 6/4/21 11:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken and besides it's not likely this is
What's changing?
On 08/06/2021 16.27, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
Really what we want is to probe the -M (machines) that a binary
support
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 08/06/2021 15.42, John Snow wrote:
>> On 6/4/21 11:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
>>> machines is about to be broken and besides it's not likely this is
>> What's changing? I'm not deeply familiar with
On 08/06/2021 15.42, John Snow wrote:
On 6/4/21 11:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken and besides it's not likely this is
What's changing? I'm not deeply familiar with aarch64. Why is this
assumption ab
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
>> machines is about to be broken...
>
> Um, what?
Really what we want is to probe the -M (machines) that a binary
supports rather than just barfing the tes
On 6/4/21 11:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken and besides it's not likely this is
What's changing? I'm not deeply familiar with aarch64. Why is this
assumption about to be broken?
improving out cove
On 6/4/21 8:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken...
Um, what?
r~
and besides it's not likely this is
improving out coverage by much. Test the "virt" machine for both arm
and aarch64 as it can be used
The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit
machines is about to be broken and besides it's not likely this is
improving out coverage by much. Test the "virt" machine for both arm
and aarch64 as it can be used by either architecture.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
tests/
13 matches
Mail list logo
