On 02.10.2010, at 07:38, John Clark wrote:
Hello,
I found I had to make a few minor changes to the MMU code for the
PowerPC 40x emulation to get NetBSD to run on a virtual PowerPC 405
core with qemu-system-ppcemb. The 'tlbre' instruction was not working,
and permission checking for a TLB
Am 01.10.2010 20:22, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de writes:
The patch fixes these gcc warnings:
./hw/es1370.c: In function ‘es1370_update_voices’:
./hw/es1370.c:411: error: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but
argument 3 has type ‘size_t’
./hw/es1370.c: In
The patch fixes these gcc warnings:
./hw/es1370.c: In function ‘es1370_update_voices’:
./hw/es1370.c:411: error: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but argument 3 has
type ‘size_t’
./hw/es1370.c: In function ‘es1370_writel’:
./hw/es1370.c:579: error: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but argument 3
According to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 7.19.6.1,
the correct length modifier for ptrdiff_t is 't', not 'z'.
Cc: Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com
Cc: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de
---
target-cris/translate.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),
According to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 7.19.6.1,
the correct length modifier for ptrdiff_t is 't', not 'z'.
Cc: Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com
Cc: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de
---
target-microblaze/translate.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
Am 30.09.2010 19:12, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:15:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
v2:
* Address review comments from A. Graf.
Edgar E. Iglesias (2):
powerpc: Add a ppc-440x5 Xilinx model
powerpc: Add a virtex5 ml507 refdesign board
On 02.10.2010, at 13:02, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 30.09.2010 19:12, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:15:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
v2:
* Address review comments from A. Graf.
Edgar E. Iglesias (2):
powerpc: Add a ppc-440x5 Xilinx model
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
According to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 7.19.6.1,
the correct length modifier for ptrdiff_t is 't', not 'z'.
Cc: Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com
Cc: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 01:02:50PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 30.09.2010 19:12, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:15:54PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
v2:
* Address review comments from A. Graf.
Edgar E. Iglesias (2):
powerpc: Add a
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Stefan Weil wrote:
The patch fixes these gcc warnings:
./hw/es1370.c: In function ?es1370_update_voices?:
./hw/es1370.c:411: error: format ?%d? expects type ?int?, but argument 3 has
type ?size_t?
./hw/es1370.c: In function ?es1370_writel?:
./hw/es1370.c:579: error:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Artyom Tarasenko atar4q...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Andreas Färber andreas.faer...@web.de
wrote:
Am 28.09.2010 um 22:24 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010
/* Check from TLB entry */
-/* XXX: there is a problem here or in the TLB fill code... */
+/* There is no longer a need to force PAGE_EXEC permission here
*/
+/* because of the tlb-attr fix in helper_4xx_tlbwe_lo() */
I guess that comment is
On 02.10.2010, at 18:49, John Clark wrote:
/* Check from TLB entry */
-/* XXX: there is a problem here or in the TLB fill code... */
+/* There is no longer a need to force PAGE_EXEC permission
here */
+/* because of the tlb-attr fix in
-target_ulong helper_4xx_tlbre_hi (target_ulong entry)
+target_ulong helper_4xx_tlbre_lo (target_ulong entry)
Huh?
To summarize, 'tlbre' has two forms: one to retrieve the high bits of
a TLB entry (TLBHI), and one to retrieve the low bits (TLBLO) of a TLB
entry. This code had the TLBLO
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2010, at 18:49, John Clark wrote:
/* Check from TLB entry */
-/* XXX: there is a problem here or in the TLB fill code... */
+/* There is no longer a need to force PAGE_EXEC
On 02.10.2010, at 19:06, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2010, at 18:49, John Clark wrote:
/* Check from TLB entry */
-/* XXX: there is a problem here or in the TLB fill code... */
+/*
Hi,
Alex:
I think you've missed the part of the patch that renames the _lo - _hi.
As John says, qemu had the hi/lo parts reversed when reading 4xx TLB regs.
Except for the comments and the define, the patch looks good to me.
John, please also add a Signed-off-by line.
Cheers
Ok, I
well, i did some more investigations and here come a results ..
this patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/65137/raw/ solves problem
partially .. NICs are working with that but after a deeper look,
connection is lost when the netstack is flooded with higher traffic ..
i can connect with
Hi,
running 0.12.5 with a Ubuntu LTS 10.04.1 64-bit kernel I see the following
error after a few days with severe load (constant 100-200mbps input).
# uname -a
Linux ubuntu-newsfeed 2.6.32-24-server #43-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 16 16:05:42 UTC
2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Oct 2 10:09:35 ubuntu-newsfeed
19 matches
Mail list logo
