[Qemu-devel] qemu-0.8.1 compile errors on x86_64 suse linux 10.1

2006-07-08 Thread Doctor Bill
At first I thought the problem was that I was using gcc-4, so I installed gcc-3.4.6, but I still get the same errors:gcc-3.4 -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -I.. -I/tmp/qemu-0.8.1/target-i386 -I/tmp/qemu-0.8.1 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -I/tmp/qemu-0.8.1/fpu

Re: [Qemu-devel] Read/Write to shares on Windows (XP Pro) host from Windows (2000 Adv) guest.

2005-08-25 Thread Doctor Bill
On 8/24/05, Francois Rioux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I manage to do with a certain success is to map network shares of the host in the guest (net use z: 10.0.2.2\MyShare in the guest). I can browse and read files from the mapped drive. However I can't write to it from the guest. I

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] const / static (against current CVS)

2005-08-24 Thread Doctor Bill
My own experience is the effect of these types of optimizations is usually negligible, although it is still the first thing I do when optimizing a program. The main improvement I find is reducing the time required to initialize variables and improved code readability. If you know values are

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] const / static (against current CVS)

2005-08-24 Thread Doctor Bill
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:41:44PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: Probably more important is to make sure none constant data structures are done on the stack. There is no good reason why any code page should be read-write. Huh? this is nonsense. I stand corrected, I ment to say on the

Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU on Win32 (+patch)

2005-07-28 Thread Doctor Bill
If you are running Linux under Windows, I highly recommend using coLinux. It is more of a pain to initially configure, but once it is the code runs just as fast as with a native Linux boot. Maybe someday, someone will merge the front ends to these two entirely different programs... If anyone

Re: [Qemu-devel] Problem installing WIndows

2005-07-27 Thread Doctor Bill
In your original message, you mentioned setup had finished. One thing I can recommend trying on your second attempt is to make sure you create more than one user account when prompted. XP Pro seems to behave differently depending on if there is one or more than one accounts. I actually had the

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU release 0.7.1

2005-07-26 Thread Doctor Bill
Just out of curiousity, I verified Norton Ghost Floppies still produce the same error. I was hoping the patch I saw a few weeks ago to allow self modifing x86 code would fix the problem... Bill ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU release 0.7.1

2005-07-26 Thread Doctor Bill
I don't have any actual benchmarks, but it is definitely much faster than under Windows with kqemu. Under XP Pro windows are opening about 4 times faster... Note that there appears to be a few new bugs in the emulation. First off, I could not get Explore.exe to finish initializing in default

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu Windows Host Client Feedback

2005-07-04 Thread Doctor Bill
Yes, it definitely acts like a stuck key. But none of the pressing none of the keys on my keyboard relieves the problem. Only restarting the QEMU virtual machine. However, I did figure out 90% of the time the problem occurs because I press the windows key to switch tasks. If I remember to

[Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu Windows Host Client Feedback

2005-07-03 Thread Doctor Bill
On 6/30/05, Doctor Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first problem I noticed is that with the 0.70 version, keys are not mapped correctly. For example, if I try to type in a URL as soon as I press the letter e explorer opens. As soon as I type the letter m, the window minimizes I