On 7/31/23 07:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; here's a target-arm pull for rc2. Four arm-related fixes,
and a couple of bug fixes for other areas of the codebase
that seemed like they'd fallen through the cracks.
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit ccb86f079a9e4d94918086a9df18c1844347
Hi; here's a target-arm pull for rc2. Four arm-related fixes,
and a couple of bug fixes for other areas of the codebase
that seemed like they'd fallen through the cracks.
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit ccb86f079a9e4d94918086a9df18c1844347aff8:
Merge tag 'pull-nbd-2023-07-28'
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 16:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> Some small arm bug fixes for rc3.
>
> -- PMM
>
> The following changes since commit 9b617b1bb4056e60b39be4c33be20c10928a6a5c:
>
> Merge tag 'trivial-branch-for-7.0-pull-request' of
> https://gitlab.com/laurent_vivier/qemu into staging (2022-
Some small arm bug fixes for rc3.
-- PMM
The following changes since commit 9b617b1bb4056e60b39be4c33be20c10928a6a5c:
Merge tag 'trivial-branch-for-7.0-pull-request' of
https://gitlab.com/laurent_vivier/qemu into staging (2022-04-01 10:23:27 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 13:26, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> A few patches for the rc today...
>
> The following changes since commit 109918d24a3bb9ed3d05beb34ea4ac6be443c138:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/nvme/tags/nvme-fixes-for-6.0-pull-request' into staging (2021-04-05
> 22:15:38 +0
A few patches for the rc today...
The following changes since commit 109918d24a3bb9ed3d05beb34ea4ac6be443c138:
Merge remote-tracking branch
'remotes/nvme/tags/nvme-fixes-for-6.0-pull-request' into staging (2021-04-05
22:15:38 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.lina
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 14:36, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> A handful of bugfixes before rc1 tomorrow...
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> The following changes since commit f9fe8450fa7cdc6268e05c93fa258f583f4514b7:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/vivier2/tags/linux-user-for-5.0-pull-request' into
A handful of bugfixes before rc1 tomorrow...
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit f9fe8450fa7cdc6268e05c93fa258f583f4514b7:
Merge remote-tracking branch
'remotes/vivier2/tags/linux-user-for-5.0-pull-request' into staging (2020-03-30
11:32:01 +0100)
are available in the Git repos
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 14:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> A small set of arm bugfixes for rc1 tomorrow.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> The following changes since commit c442b7b4a7ae8696bcdf46091d781bd9052731be:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/elmarco/tags/slirp-pull-request' into
> staging (20
A small set of arm bugfixes for rc1 tomorrow.
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit c442b7b4a7ae8696bcdf46091d781bd9052731be:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/elmarco/tags/slirp-pull-request' into
staging (2019-03-25 07:59:40 +)
are available in the Git repository at:
Last lot of patches for arm before softfreeze tomorrow...
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit ef3a6af5e789ff078d1fef880f9dfb6adf18e8f1:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kraxel/tags/vga-20181029-pull-request'
into staging (2018-10-29 12:59:15 +)
are available in the Git
On 30 July 2018 at 15:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> A set of small bugfixes for arm for 3.0; the "migration was
> broken" fixes for SMMUv3 and v7M NVIC with security extensions
> are the most significant.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> The following changes since commit 6d9dd5fb9d0e9f4a174f53a0e20a39fbe809c
A set of small bugfixes for arm for 3.0; the "migration was
broken" fixes for SMMUv3 and v7M NVIC with security extensions
are the most significant.
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit 6d9dd5fb9d0e9f4a174f53a0e20a39fbe809c71e:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull
On 7 July 2016 at 14:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> This week's collection of target-arm bugfixes...
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
>
> The following changes since commit 5563168c530e2cde8e000ee7aa4afc0ea4d0b42e:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jasowang/tags/net-pull-request' into
> staging (201
This week's collection of target-arm bugfixes...
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit 5563168c530e2cde8e000ee7aa4afc0ea4d0b42e:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jasowang/tags/net-pull-request' into
staging (2016-07-07 10:29:05 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
On 19 March 2014 12:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Last target-arm pull before rc1. I don't know of any further outstanding
> ARM related issues which would need to be fixed for 2.0 so barring any
> late-breaking bug reports I think this should be it until release.
Applied, thanks.
-- PMM
Last target-arm pull before rc1. I don't know of any further outstanding
ARM related issues which would need to be fixed for 2.0 so barring any
late-breaking bug reports I think this should be it until release.
thanks
-- PMM
The following changes since commit 059b3527f0229f4d60fd77a317503d42abd5e
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.10.2013 15:02, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> The following changes since commit
> >> fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197:
> >>
> >> Merge rem
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Peter, since I had picked up the firs
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 15:31
On 31 October 2013 17:27, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 18:18, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 31 October 2013 17:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote:
> It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by
>>>
Am 31.10.2013 18:18, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 31 October 2013 17:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote:
It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by
needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks
On 31 October 2013 17:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by
>>> needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks okay" should in
>>> exactly such a case where send
On 31 October 2013 17:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I told you to queue the patches because you needed them as prereqs
> and I was expecting the timing to work out such that you'd get a pullreq
> taken so they'd get upstream while I was away.
> Since it didn't and I wanted them in 1.7 I put them in m
Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
qom-next pull, as per
Am 31.10.2013 17:54, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> The new rule you made was: no patch without Reviewed-by.
>> Peter sending that PULL and Edgar merging it both violate that rule.
>
> I never said anything like that.
I could've sworn you did
On 31 October 2013 16:52, Andreas Färber wrote:
> I *asked* about what to do with my QEMU CPU patches that only get a
> "looks okay" and got only positive answers for whether that should be an
> Acked-by and no objection, including none from you.
I agreed with that because IMHO you may treat a "l
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 15:31
Am 31.10.2013 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andre
On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
>>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should'v
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Peter, since I had picked up
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Peter, since I had picked up
Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
qom-next pul
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
>>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches s
Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should've
>> gotten an Acked-by.
>
> Hmm? I don't recall this
On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending
> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should've
> gotten an Acked-by.
Hmm? I don't recall this part of the discussion. If you want the
patches to h
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.10.2013 15:02, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias:
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197:
>>>
>>> Merge remote-tracking branch
Hi,
Am 31.10.2013 15:02, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197:
>>
>> Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2013-10-18
>> 10:03:24 -0700
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2013-10-18
> 10:03:24 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
> g
The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2013-10-18
10:03:24 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm.git
tags/pull-target-arm-20131025
40 matches
Mail list logo