On 18/07/2016 14:15, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set:
>>
>> diff --git a/a b/b
>> similarity index 100%
>> rename from a
>> rename to b
>>
>> This raises
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set:
>
> diff --git a/a b/b
> similarity index 100%
> rename from a
> rename to b
>
> This raises the "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch"
On 07/15/2016 03:46 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set:
>
> diff --git a/a b/b
> similarity index 100%
> rename from a
> rename to b
>
> This raises the "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch"
> error because
Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set:
diff --git a/a b/b
similarity index 100%
rename from a
rename to b
This raises the "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch"
error because checkpatch.pl only considers a diff valid if it contains
at least
