On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:36:25AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> libtpms seems to be packaged and used outside QEMU, I don't say we need
> to have that in tree. I thought we were discussing swtpm cuse thing.
In any case, I'd like to stress that my comments aren't absolute. I
merely
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:24:20PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > Anyway, having it in a separate process locked down by SELinux means that
> > > even
> > > if it does go horribly wrong it won't break qemu.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > Since qemu does blocking ioctls on it and doesn't validate
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:56:17PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:32:19PM +, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > You're also tieing the code
> > > > into the QEMU
On 03/01/2017 01:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:18:01PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
On
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:56 PM Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:32:19PM +, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > You're also tieing the code
> > > >
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:32:19PM +, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> >
> > > You're also tieing the code
> > > into the QEMU release cycle, again for no tangible benefit.
> >
> > No need for ABI stability
Hi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:20 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > You're also tieing the code
> > into the QEMU release cycle, again for no tangible benefit.
>
> No need for ABI stability would be the benefit.
>
We are talking about the control channel ABI (the data channel
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:18:01PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +,
* Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:11:17PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:58:36PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:58:36PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > On 03/01/2017 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > On 03/01/2017 12:16 PM,
* Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > On 03/01/2017 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:20:13PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > > QEMU's defined the vhost-user ABI/API and delegated
> > > > > impl to something else.
> > > > The vhost ABI isn't easy to maintain at all though. So I would not
> > > > commit to that lightly without a good reason.
> > >
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:38:23PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 03/01/2017 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:25:46PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at
On 03/01/2017 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:16:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at
On 03/01/2017 12:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
I had already proposed a linked-in version
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:31:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > I had already proposed a linked-in version before I went to the
> > > out-of-process
>
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > I had already proposed a linked-in version before I went to the
> > > out-of-process
> > > design.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > I had already proposed a linked-in version before I went to the
> > out-of-process
> > design. Anthony's concerns back then were related to the code not being
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> I had already proposed a linked-in version before I went to the out-of-process
> design. Anthony's concerns back then were related to the code not being
> trusted
> and a segfault in the code could bring down all of QEMU. That we
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:40:13AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 10:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > This goes back to the question Dave mentions above ? Ignoring the control
> > channel aspect temporarily, can the CUSE TPM support the exact same ioctl
> > interface as the
On 03/01/2017 10:24 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:50 PM Stefan Berger
> wrote:
On 03/01/2017 09:17 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:26 PM Stefan Berger
@att.com>, "Xu, Quan" <quan...@intel.com>,
"silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com" <silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com>,
"hagen.la...@huawei.com" <hagen.la...@huawei.com>, "SHIH, CHING C"
<cs1...@att.com>
Date: 03/01/2017 08:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATC
Hi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:50 PM Stefan Berger
wrote:
On 03/01/2017 09:17 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:26 PM Stefan Berger wrote:
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 03/01/2017 07:54:14
AM:
>
> On
;
> > <cs1...@att.com>, "Xu, Quan" <quan...@intel.com>,
> > "silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com" <silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com>,
> > "hagen.la...@huawei.com" <hagen.la...@huawei.com>, "SHIH, CHING C"
> > <cs1...@att.com>
&g
On 03/01/2017 09:17 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:26 PM Stefan Berger > wrote:
"Daniel P. Berrange" > wrote on 03/01/2017 07:54:14
AM:
>
> On Wed,
TINA"
> > <cs1...@att.com>, "Xu, Quan" <quan...@intel.com>,
> > "silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com" <silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com>,
> > "hagen.la...@huawei.com" <hagen.la...@huawei.com>, "SHIH, CHING C"
> > <cs1
.com" <silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com>,
> "hagen.la...@huawei.com" <hagen.la...@huawei.com>, "SHIH, CHING C"
> <cs1...@att.com>
> Date: 03/01/2017 08:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE
TPM
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:25:28AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 04:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:05:20AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan
On 02/28/2017 01:31 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:29 AM Stefan Berger
> wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:24 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On 06/16/2016 04:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:05:20AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
So what was the multi-instance vTPM proxy driver patch set
Hi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:29 AM Stefan Berger
wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 03:24 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> >> On 06/16/2016 01:54 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >>> * Stefan Berger
On 06/16/2016 03:24 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/16/2016 01:54 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/16/2016 11:22 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 01:54 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > On 06/16/2016 11:22 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > > On
On 06/16/2016 01:54 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/16/2016 11:22 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/16/2016 04:05 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 11:22 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > On 06/16/2016 04:05 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > > On
On 06/16/2016 04:05 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
So what was the multi-instance vTPM proxy driver patch set about?
That's for containers.
Why have the two mechanisms? Can you
On 06/16/2016 04:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:05:20AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
So what was the multi-instance vTPM proxy driver patch set
On 06/16/2016 11:22 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/16/2016 04:05 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
So what was the
t;; Xu, Quan <quan...@intel.com>;
silviu.vlasce...@gmail.com; hagen.la...@huawei.com; SHIH, CHING C
<cs1...@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE TPM
P.S. I've removed Jeff from the cc because I got a bounce from
his AT address saying 'restricted/no
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 04:05 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > So what was the multi-instance vTPM proxy driver patch
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:05:20AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
>
>
> > > So what was the multi-instance vTPM proxy driver patch set about?
> >
> > That's for containers.
>
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > So what was the multi-instance vTPM proxy driver patch set about?
>
> That's for containers.
Why have the two mechanisms? Can you explain how the multi-instance
proxy works; my
On 06/15/2016 03:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On 05/31/2016 09:58 PM, Xu, Quan wrote:
On Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:59 AM, BICKFORD, JEFFREY E wrote:
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20,
* Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On 05/31/2016 09:58 PM, Xu, Quan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:59 AM, BICKFORD, JEFFREY E
> > wrote:
> > > > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500,
On 05/31/2016 09:58 PM, Xu, Quan wrote:
On Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:59 AM, BICKFORD, JEFFREY E wrote:
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed,
On 05/31/2016 03:10 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* BICKFORD, JEFFREY E (jb6...@att.com) wrote:
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at
> * BICKFORD, JEFFREY E (jb6...@att.com) wrote:
> > > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > > On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan
On Wednesday, June 01, 2016 2:59 AM, BICKFORD, JEFFREY E wrote:
> > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at
* BICKFORD, JEFFREY E (jb6...@att.com) wrote:
> > * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > >>"Daniel P. Berrange"
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
> AM:
>
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE
> > > The CUSE TPM and associated tools can be found here:
> > >
> > >
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 01/28/2016 08:15:21
AM:
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 01/20/2016
10:00:41
> > AM:
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/21/2016 12:08:20 AM:
>
> Well that was just one idea, it's up to you guys.
> But while modular multi-process QEMU for security
> might happen in future, I don't see us doing this
> by moving large parts of QEMU into cuse devices,
> and talking
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >>"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 05:41:32AM +, Xu, Quan wrote:
> > On January 21, 2016 at 1:08pm, wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:25:15PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > On 01/20/2016 01:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Stefan
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:25:15PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 01:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:58:02 AM:
> >>
> >>>From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> On January 21, 2016 at 1:08pm, wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:25:15PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 01/20/2016 01:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >>"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:23:19AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger
>
> Rather than integrating TPM functionality into QEMU directly
> using the TPM emulation of libtpms, we now integrate an external
> emulated TPM device. This device is expected to
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:58:02PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:20:58 AM:
> >
> > > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> >
> > > >
> > > > The CUSE TPM
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:58:02 AM:
>
> > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin"
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote on 01/20/2016 11:03:11 AM:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE
TPM
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Ste
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
> >>AM:
> >>
> >>
> >>>process at all -
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:20:58 AM:
>
> > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
>
> > >
> > > The CUSE TPM and associated tools can be found here:
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:23:19AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger
>
> Rather than integrating TPM functionality into QEMU directly
> using the TPM emulation of libtpms, we now integrate an external
> emulated TPM device. This device is expected to
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:58:02 AM:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:20:58 AM:
> >
> > > From: "Michael S.
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:20:58 AM:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> >
> > The CUSE TPM and associated tools can be found here:
> >
> > https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm
> >
> > (please use the latest version)
> >
> > To use the
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
> AM:
>
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE
> TPM
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 04,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
> >>AM:
> >>
> >>
> >>>process at all -
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
AM:
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE
TPM
>
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:23:19AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > From: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.
On 01/20/2016 01:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:58:02 AM:
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
AM:
process at all - it would make sense if there was a single
swtpm_cuse shared across all QEMU's, but if
From: Stefan Berger
Rather than integrating TPM functionality into QEMU directly
using the TPM emulation of libtpms, we now integrate an external
emulated TPM device. This device is expected to implement a Linux
CUSE interface (CUSE = character device in userspace).
78 matches
Mail list logo