Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2019-03-25 Thread Peter Maydell
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 14:31, Peter Maydell wrote: > > A small set of arm bugfixes for rc1 tomorrow. > > thanks > -- PMM > > The following changes since commit c442b7b4a7ae8696bcdf46091d781bd9052731be: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/elmarco/tags/slirp-pull-request' into > staging (20

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2019-03-25 Thread Peter Maydell
A small set of arm bugfixes for rc1 tomorrow. thanks -- PMM The following changes since commit c442b7b4a7ae8696bcdf46091d781bd9052731be: Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/elmarco/tags/slirp-pull-request' into staging (2019-03-25 07:59:40 +) are available in the Git repository at:

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2018-10-29 Thread Peter Maydell
Last lot of patches for arm before softfreeze tomorrow... thanks -- PMM The following changes since commit ef3a6af5e789ff078d1fef880f9dfb6adf18e8f1: Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kraxel/tags/vga-20181029-pull-request' into staging (2018-10-29 12:59:15 +) are available in the Git

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2018-07-30 Thread Peter Maydell
On 30 July 2018 at 15:17, Peter Maydell wrote: > A set of small bugfixes for arm for 3.0; the "migration was > broken" fixes for SMMUv3 and v7M NVIC with security extensions > are the most significant. > > thanks > -- PMM > > The following changes since commit 6d9dd5fb9d0e9f4a174f53a0e20a39fbe809c

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2018-07-30 Thread Peter Maydell
A set of small bugfixes for arm for 3.0; the "migration was broken" fixes for SMMUv3 and v7M NVIC with security extensions are the most significant. thanks -- PMM The following changes since commit 6d9dd5fb9d0e9f4a174f53a0e20a39fbe809c71e: Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2016-07-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 July 2016 at 14:48, Peter Maydell wrote: > > This week's collection of target-arm bugfixes... > > thanks > -- PMM > > > The following changes since commit 5563168c530e2cde8e000ee7aa4afc0ea4d0b42e: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jasowang/tags/net-pull-request' into > staging (201

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2016-07-07 Thread Peter Maydell
This week's collection of target-arm bugfixes... thanks -- PMM The following changes since commit 5563168c530e2cde8e000ee7aa4afc0ea4d0b42e: Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jasowang/tags/net-pull-request' into staging (2016-07-07 10:29:05 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2014-03-19 Thread Peter Maydell
On 19 March 2014 12:05, Peter Maydell wrote: > Last target-arm pull before rc1. I don't know of any further outstanding > ARM related issues which would need to be fixed for 2.0 so barring any > late-breaking bug reports I think this should be it until release. Applied, thanks. -- PMM

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2014-03-19 Thread Peter Maydell
Last target-arm pull before rc1. I don't know of any further outstanding ARM related issues which would need to be fixed for 2.0 so barring any late-breaking bug reports I think this should be it until release. thanks -- PMM The following changes since commit 059b3527f0229f4d60fd77a317503d42abd5e

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Edgar E. Iglesias
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi, > > Am 31.10.2013 15:02, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> The following changes since commit > >> fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197: > >> > >> Merge rem

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: > Peter, since I had picked up the firs

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 15:31

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 October 2013 17:27, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 18:18, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 31 October 2013 17:14, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote: > It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by >>>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.10.2013 18:18, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 31 October 2013 17:14, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote: It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 October 2013 17:14, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> It was clearly stated that a Reviewed-by >>> needs to be explicitly sent as reply but that "looks okay" should in >>> exactly such a case where send

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 October 2013 17:02, Peter Maydell wrote: > I told you to queue the patches because you needed them as prereqs > and I was expecting the timing to work out such that you'd get a pullreq > taken so they'd get upstream while I was away. > Since it didn't and I wanted them in 1.7 I put them in m

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.10.2013 16:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending qom-next pull, as per

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.10.2013 17:54, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> The new rule you made was: no patch without Reviewed-by. >> Peter sending that PULL and Edgar merging it both violate that rule. > > I never said anything like that. I could've sworn you did

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 October 2013 16:52, Andreas Färber wrote: > I *asked* about what to do with my QEMU CPU patches that only get a > "looks okay" and got only positive answers for whether that should be an > Acked-by and no objection, including none from you. I agreed with that because IMHO you may treat a "l

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 15:31

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.10.2013 16:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andre

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 October 2013 14:36, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending >>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should'v

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: > Peter, since I had picked up

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: > Peter, since I had picked up

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.10.2013 15:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: >>> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending qom-next pul

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending >>> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches s

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 31.10.2013 15:31, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending >> qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should've >> gotten an Acked-by. > > Hmm? I don't recall this

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 October 2013 14:18, Andreas Färber wrote: > Peter, since I had picked up the first two patches into my still pending > qom-next pull, as per the QEMU Summit discussion those patches should've > gotten an Acked-by. Hmm? I don't recall this part of the discussion. If you want the patches to h

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi, > > Am 31.10.2013 15:02, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias: >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197: >>> >>> Merge remote-tracking branch

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi, Am 31.10.2013 15:02, schrieb Edgar E. Iglesias: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197: >> >> Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2013-10-18 >> 10:03:24 -0700

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-31 Thread Edgar E. Iglesias
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:07:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2013-10-18 > 10:03:24 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > > g

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/6] target-arm queue

2013-10-25 Thread Peter Maydell
The following changes since commit fc8ead74674b7129e8f31c2595c76658e5622197: Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging (2013-10-18 10:03:24 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm.git tags/pull-target-arm-20131025