Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-22 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:38:16 +0100 Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Igor, > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:15:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > On Fri,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:15:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 > > > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > > > On 16/11/18

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Igor, On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:15:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 > > > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > > > On

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-21 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 > > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > General suggestions for this series: > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-21 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:50:30PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:35:47AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 > > > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-21 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Michael, On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:35:47AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 > > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > General suggestions for this

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-21 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > General suggestions for this series: > > > 1. Preferably don't do multiple changes within a patch > > > neither

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-20 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 19/11/18 19:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:14:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series >>> on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split >>> series in

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-20 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 20/11/18 13:57, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:14:26 +0100 > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series >>> on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split >>> series in several

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-20 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:14:26 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series > > on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split > > series in several smaller ones and it should really help with > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-19 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:14:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series > > on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split > > series in several smaller ones and it should really help with >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote: > I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series > on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split > series in several smaller ones and it should really help with > making series cleaner and easier/faster to review/amend/merge > vs

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-19 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > General suggestions for this series: > > 1. Preferably don't do multiple changes within a patch > > neither post huge patches (unless it's pure code movement). > > (it's easy to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote: > General suggestions for this series: > 1. Preferably don't do multiple changes within a patch > neither post huge patches (unless it's pure code movement). > (it's easy to squash patches later it necessary) > 2. Start small, pick a table

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/24] ACPI reorganization for hardware-reduced API addition

2018-11-16 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:40:23 +0100 Samuel Ortiz wrote: > This patch set provides an ACPI code reorganization in preparation for > adding a shared hardware-reduced ACPI API to QEMU. > > The changes are coming from the NEMU [1] project where we're defining > a new x86 machine type: i386/virt.