On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:38:16 +0100
Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Igor,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:15:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:15:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
> > > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 16/11/18
Igor,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:15:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
> > > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:47 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > General suggestions for this series:
> >
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:50:30PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:35:47AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
> > > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:35:47AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
> > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> > > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > General suggestions for this
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > General suggestions for this series:
> > > 1. Preferably don't do multiple changes within a patch
> > > neither
On 19/11/18 19:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:14:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series
>>> on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split
>>> series in
On 20/11/18 13:57, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:14:26 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series
>>> on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split
>>> series in several
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:14:26 +0100
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series
> > on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split
> > series in several smaller ones and it should really help with
> >
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:14:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series
> > on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split
> > series in several smaller ones and it should really help with
>
On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series
> on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split
> series in several smaller ones and it should really help with
> making series cleaner and easier/faster to review/amend/merge
> vs
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:37:54 +0100
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > General suggestions for this series:
> > 1. Preferably don't do multiple changes within a patch
> > neither post huge patches (unless it's pure code movement).
> > (it's easy to
On 16/11/18 17:29, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> General suggestions for this series:
> 1. Preferably don't do multiple changes within a patch
> neither post huge patches (unless it's pure code movement).
> (it's easy to squash patches later it necessary)
> 2. Start small, pick a table
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:40:23 +0100
Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> This patch set provides an ACPI code reorganization in preparation for
> adding a shared hardware-reduced ACPI API to QEMU.
>
> The changes are coming from the NEMU [1] project where we're defining
> a new x86 machine type: i386/virt.
15 matches
Mail list logo