Hello,
I'm trying to create a pygis-application with a code found in the quantum
gis coding and application guide. I've programmed before but I'm new to
python as such, so right now I'm basically just trying to break this down
and understand how it works.
To the issue: I'm using the code below
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 06/06/2013 22:01, John C. Tull ha scritto:
I am glad I am not alone. I only wish I possessed the skills to bring it up
to date. Here's to hoping someone else does and can.
Another possibility is to search for funding to sponsor one developer.
Hi,
On 06/07/2013 08:34 AM, JBE wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to create a pygis-application with a code found in the quantum
gis coding and application guide. I've programmed before but I'm new to
python as such, so right now I'm basically just trying to break this down
and understand how it works.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 06/06/2013 10:50, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Il 06/06/2013 10:03, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
This happens with multipolygons, not with points.
nor with lines.
We also noticed that one extra line is listed for most or all geom
tables,
Hi,
I'm getting not expected results when working with data-defined size on
symbols. I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong or maybe it's a bug.
The test it's quite simple:
1. Create a point layer with a sizeT table .
2. Create a point and give sizeT=10 .
3 Go to symbol layer
Hi,Confirmed for me.
It looks like size is multiplid by a factor 0.2.
6 value in data defined looks like 1,2 on screen. 1 look like 0,2.
BTW behaviour is not clear since old advanced properties (proportion /
rotation) have not been removed AND have a different behaviour. They do not
use actual
I also miss it. AFAIK there are additional problems in Windows,
because of rpy2, right?
just checked and I confirm that there are no Windows binaries for rpy2
and recent versions of python/R.
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Hi Régis,
Thanks for the testing. I think it's not multiplied by a defined factor at
all, divide by 0.2 and you still won't get the desired size.
Cheers.
2013/6/7 Régis Haubourg regis.haubo...@eau-adour-garonne.fr
Hi,Confirmed for me.
It looks like size is multiplid by a factor 0.2.
6
Using R via Sextante is also a good alternative. Shapefiles and Rasters are
exported into R and it's possible to apply all sorts of R tools to them.
There are a few good examples already in the algorithms tree.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@faunalia.pt wrote:
Hi
Check if you have activated Advanced - Size scale Field - Scale area /
scale diameter
In the first case, size means actually area with data defined symbology.
Regards,
Marco
On 07.06.2013 12:28, Jordi Torres wrote:
Hi Régis,
Thanks for the testing. I think it's not multiplied by a
Hi Marco,
You are right, it seems that slecting scale diameter does the trick. I
don't recall to change this, anyway thanks for the pointer.
Cheers.
2013/6/7 Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch
Hi
Check if you have activated Advanced - Size scale Field - Scale area /
scale
Thanks marco, that's it.
It's not easy to understand that advanced option are applied even if no
field is selected, since it was previous behaviour. Any idea how to make gui
more consistent for 2.1?
--
View this message in context:
Hi Paolo,
I would like to know if you have some trouble to select Oracle layer in
the Oracle connection dialog ?
I have tested the Oracle Connection for a customer and I didn't be able
to add Oracle Layer to my project because I can't select it.
Regards,
René-Luc D'Hont
Le 07/06/2013
Hi René,
Did you get the table listing?
If yes, you have to choose the geometry type and the primary key column
- otherwise you cannot select and add the layer. Same with Postgis, but
with Postgis there is some good autodetection (depending on the QGIS
version).
Andreas
Am 07.06.2013 16:07,
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for this information.
I have the table listing but I don't that I have to choose the geometry
type and the primary key column. Do I have to select the SRS ?
René-Luc D'Hont
Le 07/06/2013 16:09, Andreas Neumann a écrit :
Hi René,
Did you get the table listing?
If yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 07/06/2013 16:12, rldhont ha scritto:
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for this information.
I have the table listing but I don't that I have to choose the geometry type
and the
primary key column. Do I have to select the SRS ?
Yes, that's the point.
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 07. Jun 2013 at 16:09:25 +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
If yes, you have to choose the geometry type and the primary key column -
otherwise you cannot select and add the layer. Same with Postgis, but with
Postgis there is some good autodetection (depending on the QGIS
Hi Ted
At the moment the release looks like it will be delayed by at least
3-4 weeks - there are still around 80 blocker tickets and we had some
last minute changes we wanted to incorporate into the 2.0 relelase. I
will be posting a new release timeline early next week.
Regards
Tim
On Fri, Jun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 07/06/2013 16:39, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
QGIS needs a specific CRS (ie. SRID) and a defined geometry type (point, line,
polygon) for each layer and offers what it finds in the database or requires
to
enter what is undefined. You can
Hi Filipe,
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:37 AM, Filipe Dias filipesd...@gmail.com wrote:
Using R via Sextante is also a good alternative. Shapefiles and Rasters are
exported into R and it's possible to apply all sorts of R tools to them.
There are a few good examples already in the algorithms tree.
558909
Hi,
I'm using these two pages to get an actual download count of qgis 1.8
and by cumuling all the page views on the *.exe, the number is 558909.
Am I doing a mistake (counting twice) or is it the real number ?
regards,
jean-roc
On 06/07/2013 10:17 AM, MORREALE Jean Roc wrote:
558909
Hi,
I'm using these two pages to get an actual download count of qgis 1.8
and by cumuling all the page views on the *.exe, the number is 558909.
Am I doing a mistake (counting twice) or is it the real number ?
regards,
jean-roc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 07/06/2013 19:47, Alex Mandel ha scritto:
It's a real number, not necessarily real people (some may be bots). Also not
necessarily unique. I've read that awstats tends to overestimate up to 10%.
Its also
On the other hand, many organizations
I know about these details but I've seen the qgis' moon releases rise
and fall into oblivion and I'm still amazed by the amount of progress of
this software. So 558909 ?
Just Awesome. :)
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Yeah I know the difference, if everybody was doing like me you ahve to
multiply by x50 ^^
Is there a possibility to have a map of these downloads ?
Le 07/06/2013 20:06, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 07/06/2013 19:47, Alex Mandel ha scritto:
It's
On 06/07/2013 11:12 AM, MORREALE Jean Roc wrote:
Yeah I know the difference, if everybody was doing like me you ahve to
multiply by x50 ^^
Is there a possibility to have a map of these downloads ?
Yes it is possible to map, the GEOIP extension in awstats just needs to
be enabled (with a
Hi !
So I've been working a little bit about that deprecated folder idea.
It's not ready yet, but I have some questions since I'm not familiar at all
with QgsProjectFileTransform nor with how SVG search paths work.
https://github.com/olivierdalang/Quantum-GIS/tree/SvgLibraryRetroCompatibility
I'm posting this comment to the list to hopefully get some more
opinions about bug 7741 - Measurements in degrees even when meters
are chosen as map units
I think this bug is caused by QGIS defaulting to None / planimetric
for the ellipsoid for new projects. In 1.8 QGIS defaulted to WGS84.
IMO
28 matches
Mail list logo
