I'm not a backend guy nor a qgis server expert, but because years ago
involved in finding solution to grow style incompatibility among geoserver
and qgis via sld (before in Boundless end to nothing because there were any
tech solution... or I'm too tech limiteated to imagine a solution) later
addin
Hi Jonathan,
You keep repeating yourself. You started the exact same discussion a
year ago.
You have a valid point, of course, I don't argue that. But if you think
about small organizations that do not have a lot of personal (or
financial) resources, it would be a lot of burden to invest twi
And imagine that
Mapserver 1.0,
GeoServer 1.0 and
QGIS Server 1.0
had all been released at the same date. What would these deployment
numbers have been like now?
Regards,
Raymond
On 09-06-2020 01:18, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:12, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
Nice, thoughtfu
Thank you Jonathan for raising the discussion, I think this should be
a good opportunity to focus on how we can gain a bigger "market share"
and restart investing on the server with both time and funds.
Full disclaimer: I'm a QGIS server developer.
It would be probably useful to start a discussio
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:25 PM Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 6/9/20 1:18 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
> > Something else to consider is whether technologies like WMS are
> > ultimately just "dead end" technologies now,
>
> Definitely not agreeing here :-)
>
> > and possibly we'd be
> > better off f
Hi Alessandro,
Good idea - I would be happy to join such a meeting.
In our case (talking for my employer), it is mainly performance,
reliability, scalability and maintenance where we would like to see
improvements. A cache that can be shared between instances would be
great to have. And perhap
which projects is of course
> their own prerogative.
> >
> > (Disclosure: I have no horse in this race; I don't run or administer any
> mapping servers, but I have done GeoServer in the past.)
> >
> >
> >
> > _
Hi Andreas, (& All),
A fair point, but I believe this is an important point and this year I
do have data to back up my point; in fact the grant program is what
motivated me to finally get around to doing this analysis.
It seems from the replies that while there are a few differentiators,
the
Plugin PostGIS Sampling Tool approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1143] PostGIS Sampling Tool 1.5.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/postgis_sampling_tool/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
Lis
Hi Jonathan,
Rest assured - the majority of QGIS funds is already (and has always
been going) into bug fixing. Again - both Desktop and server users
benefit from that bug fixing.
We publish our financial reports here:
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/finance/index.html
I
Hi,
I can't agree more with Andreas.
Just note that we have major companies betting on QGIS server for
production use and considering switching from Geoserver to QGIS server to
get rid of the double administration task burden.
They fund progressively what is missing and QGIS.org helps sometimes fo
Plugin GéoGrandEst approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2084] GéoGrandEst 0.9.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/geograndest/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.or
Hi Jonathan,
Can you share with us how you harvest your information on available
public OGC services? You probably have that information published
somewhere - so if you could point me towards this URL, it would help.
I noticed that all of the services of our province (my employer) can't
be fo
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:18, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:12, Tim Sutton wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > Nice, thoughtful message below, thanks Jonathon. I wonder what it will take
> > to move the needle above 1%? And whether we should try to use our funds to
> > make that hap
Hi Nyall,
Thanks for clarifying - I am relieved by your further statements ;-)
I don't know a good replacement of ArcGIS Server portal (or whatever
that product is called currently). I agree that it would be great if
there would be a good replacement for that - and that would need further
fund
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 20:07, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi Nyall,
>
> Thanks for clarifying - I am relieved by your further statements ;-)
>
> I don't know a good replacement of ArcGIS Server portal (or whatever that
> product is called currently). I agree that it would be great if there would
>
Hi Andreas,
Sure, happy to share.
There's a little on the About page: https://www.geoseer.net/about.php
and then scattered around blog posts (the ones with the "GeoSeer" tag
are probably best for that: https://www.geoseer.net/blog/?t=GeoSeer ),
but put simply - We scrape a lot of different sour
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for sharing this information. I don't know anything better.
While looking at some services that I know personally, I also found out
that others services are listed twice, because a machine might have a
DNS alias. That is also something to consider - perhaps sort out
machine
Hi all,
At OPENGIS.ch we have recently looked into different raster formats. The
results can be read here:
https://www.opengis.ch/2020/06/09/offline-wms-benchmarking-raster-formats-for-qfield/
Not that surprising, but one of the interesting findings was that webp
is very efficient. Low files
Hi Andreas,
Interesting.
Behind the scenes, GeoSeer one-way hashes the GetCapabilities documents
and that hash is used as the document key. Identical GetCapabilities
documents therefore get the same key and thus only appear once in the
final index. But one single character different in the en
Hi Marco,
I agree. WebP would be interesting. It could potentially replace both
png and jpeg - if encoding and decoding is fast and if filesize can
compete. The good thing of WebP compared with JPEG is that it supports
transparency. According to your brief study, it seems to score well
regarding
On 2020-06-09 13:46, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Interesting.
Behind the scenes, GeoSeer one-way hashes the GetCapabilities documents and
that hash is used as the document key. Identical GetCapabilities documents
therefore get the same key and thus only appear once in the final inde
Hi Andreas,
On 6/9/20 1:47 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi Marco,
I agree. WebP would be interesting. It could potentially replace both
png and jpeg - if encoding and decoding is fast and if filesize can
compete. The good thing of WebP compared with JPEG is that it supports
transparency.
E
Thanks for the excellent questions Even
Lucie has done the analysis and has all the parameters. She is not in
the office these days. Once she is back I hope she can share the
parameters and potentially also add a couple of additional rows to the
table with improved parameters.
Sorry that I c
Hi,
I submitted an update of a plugin last friday ([1364] UMEP) but it is still not
approved. I dont see any other messages from you. What has happened?
best regards,
Fredrik
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: h
Matthias,
thanks for the analysis. There are however a few unexpected results.
1) I'd expect gpkg pyramid_JPEG and COG_JPEG to have very similar sizes, even
COG_JPEG
being potentially slightly smaller.
And I'd also expect COG_JPEG to be slighly faster (but with less confidence
that my
stateme
Hi,
I believe that a better deployment process for Server on Windows might
be one way for little a bigger market share. I think that there are more
people than me that uses Desktop today next to the Esri platform that
would gladly start to switch over to Server as a wms provider if posible.
A
Hi Henrik,
Good idea. Now that Windows server has a Linux subsystem and docker, the
easiest thing would be to use docker, I think. That way you would have
the exact same setup like on Linux. No more strange Windows problems.
It might be one path to use to tackle the windows installation probl
Plugin UMEP approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1364] UMEP 3.14" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/UMEP/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgi
Plugin OpenEO approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1815] OpenEO 0.9 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/openeo-qgis-plugin-master/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https:/
Plugin OneAtlas approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1943] OneAtlas 1.1.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/oneatlas-qgis-plugin-1_0_1/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists
Plugin Open reblock approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2086] Open reblock 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/open_reblock/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://
Plugin Networks approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[629] Networks 2.4.4" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/networks/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/
Good day I think that being able to publish a project directly through QGIS
Server just by mounting the QGis project done on the desktop is just
fantastic if those tiny great details of QGIS Server were fixed would
definitely take off tremendously
Maybe integrating the lizmap plugin into the QGis
Plugin Mappia Publisher approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1963] Mappia Publisher 2.8.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/mappia_publisher/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https:/
Hi,
Using the Measuring tools now on a dual screen setup, the angle tool
pops up very much out of sight every time.
Either the position is not remembered (if I am correct the line
measuring tool pops up above my screen always).
But would it be an idea to make these dialogs dockable? Then a user c
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 16:21, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Using the Measuring tools now on a dual screen setup, the angle tool
> pops up very much out of sight every time.
> Either the position is not remembered (if I am correct the line
> measuring tool pops up above my screen always)
Jonathan, I forgot to ask you: do you have any statistics/guesses
about the underlying operating system ?
It would also be interesting to know how much "cloud" technology is
used (AWS & C.).
Cheers
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 10:43 PM Jonathan Moules
wrote:
>
> Hi List,
> Some of you may have seen
38 matches
Mail list logo
