Marcel Kilgus ha scritto:
> George Gwilt wrote:
>
>>> Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
>>>
>> The test version of QPC2 demonstrated at the recent Quanta meeting in
>> Manchester certainly does run GWASS.
>>
At this point, does exist the possibility that TURBO compil
On 13 Apr 2006, at 09:17, Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
> Marcel Kilgus ha scritto:
>> George Gwilt wrote:
>>
Next QPC2 version will probably be able to run it.
>>> The test version of QPC2 demonstrated at the recent Quanta
>>> meeting in
>>> Manchester certainly does run GWASS.
>>>
> At th
Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
> I am wondering if these QPC emulation changes implement the full set
> of the M68020 new instructions
Pretty much the full thing except MMU and FPU.
> or just a subset of these, as an example MOVE16 instruction will be
> implemented ?
MOVE16 is 68040 only.
Marcel
George Gwilt wrote:
> For various reasons only a subset of 68020+ instructions have been
> coded so far for QPC2.
That was some days ago, I have done much in the meantime ;-)
> Instructions not emulated include MOVE16 (68040) and TRAPcc.
I didn't implement MOVE16 because it's in the LINE-F segme
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, hitchies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Regards to all,
>
>John, in the Wales they can find when they deliver to the door ... :-)
Umm ... so you are still around then, John ? . :-)
--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Maili
Rick Chagouri-Brindle wrote:
...
>>I'm still stuck in the Space Invaders, Galaxians and Pssst (Spectrum
>>game from Ultimate in the 1980s). Sad, eh? The only more modern game i
>>play is The Wall from JMS and sometimes Mah Jonngg when I can get my
>>wife off that computer.
>>
> Psst? I don't
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick Chagouri-Brindle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> As a more recent returnee to the QL scene, I don't know if you feel
>> the same, that after using PCs all day at work it's nice to come home
>> to a QL for a change :-)
>>
>Definitely! In fact, for me, I think on
John Gilpin wrote:
...
> I successfully use Surgical Spirit (Obtainable from any chemist shop)
> and a cotton bud to clear the jets on my HP printer. Alternatively, HP used
> to provide strips of adhesive backed "velcro" type material which you stick
> onto a "test page" provided using the
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Newson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] printer problem
> John Gilpin wrote:
>
> ...
>> I successfully use Surgical Spirit (Obtainable from any chemist shop)
>> and a cotton
Fabrizio Diversi schreef:
>
> Does exist a limit about the number of array items that
> mawdraw can display ?
>
I did some further testing on Mawdraw.
Mawdraw seems to have a 32K limit for 2nd & 3rd dimensions and not the 65K
limit of S'Basic.
I tried arrays with items from 10 to 100 chrs and ca
John Gilpin wrote:
...
>>Out of interest...what is surgical spirit?
>
> According to the bottle I have it contains the following:
> Virgin Caster Oil BP 2.5%v/v, methyl salicylate BP 0.5%v/v, Diethyl
> Phthalate BP 2.0%v/v, industrial methylated spirit BP 95%v/v.
>
> So it's mainly Industrial M
Hi Jon,
Pity you didn't get over to the Manchester AGM. Nemqlug (the host sub group)
had a real WORKING party at the workshop, repairing old QLs and other
associated equipment. We also had a number of working QL Monitors for sale
from as little as £1 - YES one GBPound. Would you be interested i
Bob Spelten ha scritto:
> I did some further testing on Mawdraw.
> ..
>
yes totally right, as usual the limit of 32768 from Wman, same i think,
for all pointer driven programs.
I have already abandoned the idea of display every single fields of my
dbase (dbas) using a multidime
>
>
>>> As I got it for nowt, I'm not too worried about replacing it -
>>> especially as
>>> I intend to get one that is Linux compatible.
>>>
>>>
>> Is Linux able to drive those "control-code-less" Windows printers, or
>> does Linux have the same sorts of problems that QL has with tho
Την Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:20:51 -0400,ο(η) Jeremy Taffel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
>
>>
>>
As I got it for nowt, I'm not too worried about replacing it -
especially as
I intend to get one that is Linux compatible.
>>> Is Linux able to drive those "control-code-less" Wind
> Only longer periods of no or very low
>usage tends to cause the jet blockages again.
Right, the worst treatment for an inkjet printer is NONE.
A cleansing fluid sold alongside the refill inks is carbontetrachloride, or
it's health&safety substitute. Industrially a de-greasing agent, also use
16 matches
Mail list logo
