Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-08 Thread Robert Newson
Rich Mellor wrote: > I would be interested in sourcing a new development of SGCs (must write to > Stuart about this), but I do wonder how many people would still be willing > to pay £200-£300 for a SGC nowadays. Certainly with a need to make 50 > boards to make it worthwhile, I am not certa

Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-08 Thread Dilwyn Jones
> Thank you guys for support! I was thinking that I am the only one > with > classic QL here. Nearly everyone here is referring about GC, SGC, > Aurora, Qubide, QXL, Q60, QPC... I think it is because people who join a mailing list like this tend to have the latest products. I still have a QL (wi

Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-08 Thread Rich Mellor
I would be interested in sourcing a new development of SGCs (must write to Stuart about this), but I do wonder how many people would still be willing to pay £200-£300 for a SGC nowadays. Certainly with a need to make 50 boards to make it worthwhile, I am not certain there would be a big enou

Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, hitchies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Re: Jan's - >= >I wonder if anyone here has some spare (not used) GC or SGC for sale? My >QL has only superQboard with 512k RAM, which is good, but not enough (ZX >emulator is demanding). I would appreciate if you could

Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-08 Thread omega
Hello John from Wales, Sergiusz, > Such an ad. no problem here! But (today) if you find a GC or SGC 'not used' > you will succeed where many others have failed. But, if so, please reveal > your source(s) here! :-) > > Happy hunting and happy QLing, > Thank you guys for support! I was think