Re: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-14 Thread David Tubbs
IThere was a Stewart or maybe a Stuart of Sawston nr Cambridge, worked at Team, Royston (where Johnathen Oakley went). He built a motherboard for the QL system, FLP included on board. Whatever came of thet, II've seen no mention of it since ? ___ QL

Re: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-13 Thread Dave Park
I am confident a board with an FPGA solution would be very affordable. If you factor in the development costs of the FPGA's programming, and writing drivers for SMSQ/E and/or Minerva, you'd still be looking at a board that costs less than $250... It would be noticeably faster than a Super Gold Card

Re: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-13 Thread Francois Lanciault
I would prefer a 68xxx based solution as I am a retro hardware fan... But a FPGA is close enough :-) What kind of price are we talking here... I know that I would buy anything that gives me faster speed than a superGoldCard and that is $300 or less. I have no interest in an emulated solution. I

Re: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-12 Thread gdgqler
On 11 Mar 2011, at 22:38, Dave Park wrote: > A genuine 680X0: > + compatibility, already designed > - availability and price > Aren't these obsolescent or obsolete? > An emulated 680X0 in FPGA form: > + highly configurable, offers single chip solution, 68k VHDL sources in > public domain, very

[Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-12 Thread thorsten herbert
>Hi all, > >So here's the state of play in designing new QL replacements... > >Peter Graf is bogged down with some issues on his board. It has a decent >spec but it doesn't currently "work" in a meaningful sense. He has various >obstacles (working alone) that mean his design will be delayed or not

Re: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-11 Thread Dave Park
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:38 PM > Subject: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play... > > > If someone can make an FPGA happen, I can make PCBs happen, then someone can > make the OS happen, then we have a computer. > > Of course, you could always decide that QPCII

Re: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-11 Thread Lee Privett
...@q-v-d.com Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:38 PM Subject: [Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play... If someone can make an FPGA happen, I can make PCBs happen, then someone can make the OS happen, then we have a computer. Of course, you could always decide that QPCII or Q-emuLator

[Ql-Users] QL replacements - state of play...

2011-03-11 Thread Dave Park
Hi all, So here's the state of play in designing new QL replacements... Peter Graf is bogged down with some issues on his board. It has a decent spec but it doesn't currently "work" in a meaningful sense. He has various obstacles (working alone) that mean his design will be delayed or not release