t; Adrian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com
> [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Tobias Fröschle
> Sent: 12 March 2011 17:59
> To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
> Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] SPI (was Ser-USB on Minerva)
>
> Am Samsta
s Fröschle
Sent: 12 March 2011 17:59
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] SPI (was Ser-USB on Minerva)
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2011, 11:00 + schrieb Adrian Ives:
> I agree 100% with everything you say. And ... by the way ... USBWiz
> can talk SPI, which is where I'm coming
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2011, 19:14 + schrieb Tony Firshman:
> > All in all, I do think there's worse parts in the QDOS file system than
> > its directory handling - like the length restrictions for path names (32
> > characters don't quite fit into the 21st century).
> I always thought it was pa
Tobias Fröschle wrote, on 12/Mar/11 18:59 | Mar12:
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2011, 19:13 +0100 schrieb Ralf Reköndt:
Tobias Fröschle wrote:
(and there's no need to implement a FAT filesystem on the QL)
...which maybe has the advantage of true directories...
Cheers...Ralf
Ralf,
well, maybe when
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2011, 19:13 +0100 schrieb Ralf Reköndt:
> Tobias Fröschle wrote:
>
> > (and there's no need to implement a FAT filesystem on the QL)
>
> ...which maybe has the advantage of true directories...
>
> Cheers...Ralf
Ralf,
well, maybe when FAT directories would be used, you'd r
Tobias Fröschle wrote:
(and there's no need to implement a FAT filesystem on the QL)
...which maybe has the advantage of true directories...
Cheers...Ralf
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Am Samstag, den 12.03.2011, 11:00 + schrieb Adrian Ives:
> I agree 100% with everything you say. And ... by the way ... USBWiz can
> talk SPI, which is where I'm coming from with all of this. With a faster
Adrian,
well, if you get the QL itself to be able to communicate using SPI,
there's at
Tobias,
I agree 100% with everything you say. And ... by the way ... USBWiz can
talk SPI, which is where I'm coming from with all of this. With a faster
throughput it suddenly becomes more possible to use the other USBWiz
functions, such as keyboard and mouse and maybe ... just maybe ... a USB
e
