- Original Message -
From: Alex Wells
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers
On Thursday 14 September 2006 20:43, John Gilpin wrote:
You are quite correct (as usual) Geoff.
Volume 23 Issue 2 April
There appears to be two age camps here ( Marcel ). I actually lied
about my age, im not
40, well not for another three months but 39.751 is close
enough i guess - has
anyone spotted the small bug in my arithmetic routine, sounds familiar
:-)
Moving on and I'm asking purely out of
Neil Riley wrote:
Moving on and I'm asking purely out of interest, does anyone
know the number of paid up QUANTA members and number of
subscribers to QL Today.
I used to be a QUANTA member, but it lapsed several years ago due to
inaction on my part (oops). I've never subscribed to QL Toady
. Come on - give us a challenge.
Regards
John Gilpin.
Quanta Treasurer Membership Secretary.
- Original Message -
From: Ade Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers
Neil Riley
.
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: Re
At 19:33 14/09/2006 +0100, you wrote:
I now have a little exercise for the committee. Look up the membership for
the last ten years, plot this on a graph and then extrapolate it to
determine membership at the end of the 3 year term of the current officers.
You are in for a nasty shock!,
I had
