On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 01:01:02AM +0100, Q Branch wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thierry
Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Derek, I am right now writing a device driver for CD-ROM drives on Q40/Q60
(I think I can announce it officially now as things build up nicely and
I will
At 12:08 ìì 26/6/2001 +0200, you wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 01:01:02AM +0100, Q Branch wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thierry
Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Derek, I am right now writing a device driver for CD-ROM drives on Q40/Q60
(I think I can announce it officially
Hehe... only problem... if we have our own filing system
how are we
going to record it?
Phoebus
Ah well, there's the clever bit. If your CD writing software enables
it you can prepare your raw CD image in a binary file and then copy it
straight to a CD.
Ian.
-Original
At 01:24 ìì 26/6/2001 +0100, you wrote:
Hehe... only problem... if we have our own filing system
how are we
going to record it?
Phoebus
Ah well, there's the clever bit. If your CD writing software enables
it you can prepare your raw CD image in a binary file and then copy it
Richard wrote:
there is no need to add the bloat of ISO9660 just to read a single QXL.WIN
Putting the QXL.WIN image directly on the CD is much cleaner and files
inside are still trivially accessible using qxltool on any reasonable OS.
Time to set out own standards :)
Seconded :-)
A raw SMSQ
At 04:52 ìì 26/6/2001 +0200, you wrote:
Richard wrote:
there is no need to add the bloat of ISO9660 just to read a single QXL.WIN
Putting the QXL.WIN image directly on the CD is much cleaner and files
inside are still trivially accessible using qxltool on any reasonable OS.
Time to set out
At 04:52 ìì 26/6/2001 +0200, you wrote:
Richard wrote:
there is no need to add the bloat of ISO9660 just to read a single QXL.WIN
Putting the QXL.WIN image directly on the CD is much cleaner and files
inside are still trivially accessible using qxltool on any reasonable OS.
Time
At 06:12 ìì 26/6/2001 +0200, you wrote:
sure they are fully accessible. To burn the CD you need just to copy the
raw partition to the CD writer.
Bye
Richard
Okay, then it will not be as elegant as using an actual program to select
files but like a temp partition on the SMSQ/E side of
At 06:08 ìì 26/6/2001 +0200, you wrote:
Why would they want to transfer the whole image if they can get single
files out of it?
t.
Ohh I meant from QL to CD not the other way round since we will be
accessing it fully anyways
this is trivial on the Q40: suppose you have
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 at 19:09:20, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Virus alert (No, not a hoax !)
I got a private email Geoff.
Thanks, also to Tony.
The reason I posed this question was that you
At 12:02 AM 6/28/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Maybe Simon (N) Goodwin or Chas Dillon can shed some light into this?
They should know the status. I believe that most of the programs had a
time clause to them and are now owned by the original authors. Now the
problem might be tracking down the
Richard Zidlicky wrote:
there is no need to add the bloat of ISO9660 just to read a single
QXL.WIN
Putting the QXL.WIN image directly on the CD is much cleaner and files
inside are still trivially accessible using qxltool on any reasonable OS.
Time to set out own standards :)
And Roy Wood
12 matches
Mail list logo
