>For me the reference in my hobby is not Q40/60 or QPC,
>it is QDOS/SMSQ and the man who developped QDOS/SMSQ
>who is neither Claus or Marcel or Peter. And this man
>decided that both QPC and Q40 were good enough platforms
>for his life's work. Hence I have no preference between
>Q4P0C either. And
For me the reference in my hobby is not Q40/60 or QPC,
it is QDOS/SMSQ and the man who developped QDOS/SMSQ
who is neither Claus or Marcel or Peter. And this man
decided that both QPC and Q40 were good enough platforms
for his life's work. Hence I have no preference between
Q4P0C either. And wish
Hi
Just a small addition:
The fact that I happened to intervene after Marcel's comments
DOES NOT mean that my reply was prompted by his comments
only!
Just to disperse a small misunderstanding...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 22 Mar 2002, at 15:48, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(attacks on QPC)
IIRC, I wrote 'c'me on, people grow up'.
Lest this thing gets out of hand, I didn't single out Marcel or Peter
or Claus or or or in that comment.
I often don't comment when anybody on this list "attacks" anybody
else - do not co
Michael Grunditz wrote:
> Now stop this..
It might have already stopped if you hadn't answered...
> I have recently entered the QL world. I bough myself a Q40 because I felt
> that a native QL clone is what I needed.
Which is a fine thing. Did anybody say anything against that?
> If I disagre
Now stop this..
I have recently entered the QL world. I bough myself a Q40 because I felt
that a native QL clone is what I needed. I dont have a pc to run QPC2 ,
and from my perspective, its more fun to develop operating system with
real hardware then a emulator.
If I disagree with someone on w
>> I think that it's time to put away the knives and recognize that
>>QDOS/SMS/whatever will die out unless we all pull together.
>
>I Totally agree.
>
>Come on people, grow up.
I would completely fall in with the idea that we all get on and work
together. Indeed I have said this on many occasio
In article ,
Phoebus Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>??? 20/3/2002 6:37:23 , ?/? Roy Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
>
>
>One thing I would like to say...
>In light of the fact that we are probably in front of one of the most
>significant
Yes, of course, any kind of quarrel seems nonsense ! the problem is only to
develop further, if possible, the system we have and would like to use more and
more !
On 21 Mar 2002, at 6:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 100% agreement from me Phoebus. If people want the QL/QDOS/SMS industry, albeit
>that it is small, to survive then there is no point in these protracted discussions
>about which is right or wrong. We must ALL learn to accept that different p
Peter,
(RE Subject - I'm staying out of this one by the way !)
I've not forgotten about the Trump Card - I just haven't found it yet :o)
I'll let you know ASAP.
Cheers,
Norman.
PS. ROY : I think it was Peter who said the list was a waste of time.
-
Norman
> ??? 20/3/2002 6:37:23 ìì, ?/? Roy Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
>
>
> One thing I would like to say...
> In light of the fact that we are probably in front of one of the most significant
> breakthroughs in the QL world (Making SMS open), I would urge EVERYONE to put
> their "battle cries",
??? 20/3/2002 6:37:23 ìì, ?/? Roy Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
One thing I would like to say...
In light of the fact that we are probably in front of one of the most significant
breakthroughs in the QL world (Making SMS open), I would urge EVERYONE to put their
"battle cries",
"weapons" an
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>...another "discussion" which will lead to nothing. I'm sure you have
>something to answer but don't be surprised if I will keep quiet. I
>don't want to bore the others.
>
>Marcel
>
I 100% agree with the sentiments expresse
Claus Graf wrote:
> You were the one who decided to introduce the incompatibility between Q40
> and QPC highcolor.
a) There were already two different colour definitions (I wouldn't
have introduced a second one in the first place, especially not a
little endian one). The QXL one was easier to ad
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
>As everybody knows there was some BS between QPC and the Q40 people
>and looking at pqiv for example they don't seem to be very much
>interested in compatibility
I would like to remind you of something:
You were the one who decided to introduce the incompatibility between
16 matches
Mail list logo