In article <001201c0f1ea$f3744ae0$ef065cc3@default>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>>Good idea! It could be a mixture of netiqette and hints on how to
>use
>>>certain email programs when mailing to this list.
>>
>>Also that we have a generalised list on ql-users, and not sections of
>>i
>>Good idea! It could be a mixture of netiqette and hints on how to
use
>>certain email programs when mailing to this list.
>
>Also that we have a generalised list on ql-users, and not sections of
>interests and needs.
It might be a useful exercice if someone was to compile a FAQ
(Frequently Ask
>> Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2
letter
>> words from this list.
>Even... QL ?
Oops...I meant the dread (sorry Claus) P* word ;-)
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 07:17:56PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Zidlicky
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >
> >> >I am really looking forward to this.
> >
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
>> >> Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2 letter
>> >> words from this list.
>>
>> My understanding is that soql, although not fully complete, is in a
>> working form.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Zidlicky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>> >I am really looking forward to this.
>> >Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails.
>> >E
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> >> Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2 letter
> >> words from this list.
>
> My understanding is that soql, although not fully complete, is in a
> working form. More a matter of other software authors building up on it
> with
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >I am really looking forward to this.
> >Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails.
> >Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux.
>
> What ? ...
Dilwyn
Are you perhaps an optimist?
Ian Pizer, 49 ch. Machery, 1292 Chambesy, Geneva, Switzerland.
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel.41227581410
AKA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8 Jun 2001, at 17:04, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Once soql is complete, I daresay we can banish OE and other 2 letter
> words from this list.
Even... QL ?
Wolfgang
On 8 Jun 2001, at 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails.
> Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux.
I had a dream...
Wolfgang
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>
>> Seriously though, the more I think about this, the more I think Claus
>> is right, such problems are best dealt with privately off list,
>> although if you have a non-QL problem which affects yo
Hi!
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Seriously though, the more I think about this, the more I think Claus
> is right, such problems are best dealt with privately off list,
> although if you have a non-QL problem which affects your QLing (and I
> think this falls into that category) the
> >I didn't recognize the items or my version is not sufficiently
> >advanced. I'm using Eudora Light 3.0.6.
> >Could you give these tiny feet some tiny steps in the right
direction ?
>
>Relax folks - I've dealt with this offlist
>
>martinw
Phew, I could just see the look on Claus's face ;-)
Se
>When I read the above bit about Eudora, I immediately went the Tools
>--> Options route and looked for the warning and the option. Either
>I didn't recognize the items or my version is not sufficiently
>advanced. I'm using Eudora Light 3.0.6.
>Could you give these tiny feet some tiny step
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Geoff Wicks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Martin Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD
>
>> This is getting too far away from QL matters so I
- Original Message -
From: Martin Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD
> This is getting too far away from QL matters so I think we should stop
> here before we get complaints!
Not really. This has been an interesting and usefu
Martin Wheatley writes:
> Should Internet access via the QL become the norm then receiving
> e-mails in HTML is something that will have to be coped with.
> OE is not going to go away unfortunately and OE users do tend
> to communicate with each other via HTML and forget that not
> everyone else
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martin Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>I wrote about OE
>
> >>It's only a matter of time before OE starts appearing with no text
> >>options
>
>And Malcolm replied
> >Unlikely, as text is one of the features needed.
>
>It needs to be able to read text but it do
I wrote about OE
>>It's only a matter of time before OE starts appearing with no text
>>options
And Malcolm replied
>Unlikely, as text is one of the features needed.
It needs to be able to read text but it doesn't have to send it unless
Microsoft want to
This is getting too far away from QL
In article <006d01c0ea64$7aec2760$5c16989e@btclick>, Peter S Tillier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>- Original Message -
>From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:16 PM
>Subje
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martin Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>Peter S Tillier wrote
>
> >Why is it that Microshift uses default settings such as these when there are
> >(?were?) clear standards for email on the 'net?
>
>E-mail is a classic instance of the Microsoft 'taking over
>a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martin Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >>PS I can still think of a couple more excuses for bungling up after
> >>this, but I think I better save them for my own use ;)
>
> >I believe that Martin uses Eudora, and not Lookout. So he is probably
> >not 'guilty
Peter S Tillier wrote
>Why is it that Microshift uses default settings such as these when there are
>(?were?) clear standards for email on the 'net?
E-mail is a classic instance of the Microsoft 'taking over
a new sector' method at work
(1) Ignore all existing standards and create your own (
>>
>>PS I can still think of a couple more excuses for bungling up after
>>this, but I think I better save them for my own use ;)
>I believe that Martin uses Eudora, and not Lookout. So he is probably
>not 'guilty' of this :-)
Only of calling Marcel Markus!
Eudora can be set to warn whe
2001 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD
> >Under Tools/Options/Send, untick "Reply to messages using same format
> >as they were sent".
Why is it that Microshift uses default settings such as these when there are
(?were?) clear standards for e
In article <001501c0e9a3$7d0e15b0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, P Witte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Martin Wheatley writes:
>
>> Marcus wrote
>> >It's just that you answered an HTML mail and therefore it
>generated
>> >HTML, too, I suppose.
>>
>> And Malcolm replied
>> >Also, to send HTML you must have M
Martin Wheatley writes:
> Marcus wrote
> >It's just that you answered an HTML mail and therefore it
generated
> >HTML, too, I suppose.
>
> And Malcolm replied
> >Also, to send HTML you must have MIME enabled ... otherwise it is
> >rejected. Dis-enable MIME when sending plain text.
> >If you
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martin Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>Marcus wrote
> >It's just that you answered an HTML mail and therefore it generated
> >HTML, too, I suppose.
>
>And Malcolm replied
> >Also, to send HTML you must have MIME enabled ... otherwise it is
> >rejected. Dis-e
Martin Wheatley wrote:
> Marcus wrote
It's really spelt "Marcel", that's no typo ;-)
Marcel
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD
> Geoff Wicks wrote:
> > Seriously, Marcel, do you usually get HTML-messages from me or was it
just
> > this one?
>
> IIRC just this one
Marcus wrote
>It's just that you answered an HTML mail and therefore it generated
>HTML, too, I suppose.
And Malcolm replied
>Also, to send HTML you must have MIME enabled ... otherwise it is
>rejected. Dis-enable MIME when sending plain text.
>If you are using Outlook Excess, it is buried
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Geoff Wicks wrote:
> [HTML-Mail]
> > Since doing that I have had no complaints.
>
> Complain.
>
> Marcel ;-)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Geoff Wicks wrote:
>> Seriously, Marcel, do you usually get HTML-messages from me or was it just
>> this one?
>
>IIRC just this one.
>
>> Our problem is that however we set our emails they still seem to get sent
>> HTML. Th
Geoff Wicks wrote:
> Seriously, Marcel, do you usually get HTML-messages from me or was it just
> this one?
IIRC just this one.
> Our problem is that however we set our emails they still seem to get sent
> HTML. The dodge I use seemed to be the only way to fool the system.
It's just that you a
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Geoff Wicks wrote:
> [HTML-Mail]
> > Since doing that I have had no complaints.
>
> Complain.
>
> Marcel ;-)
Seriously, Marcel, do you usually get HTML-messages from me or was it just
this one?
Our problem is that howev
36 matches
Mail list logo
