Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - Parameter passing

2003-02-19 Thread Phoebus Dokos
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:29:18 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The other quirk is that Turbo will report an error if you pass a different type of variable to the parameter type listed in the reference, for example: I don't believe that is a bug per se. You have to take into account that

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - Parameter passing

2003-02-19 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 19/02/2003 23:19:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't believe that is a bug per se. You have to take into account that the implicit datatypes that are used are there to create faster code. So if you IMPLICITLY define a datatype to use and you feed it

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - Parameter passing

2003-02-19 Thread Phoebus Dokos
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:23:50 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 19/02/2003 23:19:29 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't believe that is a bug per se. You have to take into account that the implicit datatypes that are used are there to create faster code. So if

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - Parameter passing

2003-02-19 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 19/02/2003 23:46:08 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's a point of view I guess... When you write with intent to compile some things need to be taken into account... You would never assume the same though for VisualBasic though would you? (Okay bad example ;-)

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled programs

2002-11-02 Thread Geogwilt
In a message dated 02/11/02 15:13:04 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: George Gwilt is the expert on how to get at the source of compiled programs. However it may not be possible unless the program has been compiled with flags in the same way as C programs can be compiled with a

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs

2002-10-30 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, many of the early commercial programs have been compiled with either Turbo or QLiberator. Is there any way of writing a program which will generate the source code for compiled programs?? As far as I know Qliberated programs are mostly just tokenized

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs

2002-10-30 Thread Arnold Clarke
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs In a message dated 29/10/02 18:57:21 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I used to play

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs

2002-10-30 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 05:37 ìì 31/10/2002, Arnold Clarke wrote: That may also be the problem when you're transferring the file to your PC I tend to forget about that limitation and always end up with files that do not work... The best sequence is: 1. Zip the files in the QL 2. Copy them to a DOS or QL disk

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - crib

2002-10-30 Thread .
??? 30/10/2002 6:35:44 ??, ?/? Fabrizio Diversi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??: Crib work using my copy of QPC 3.03, I taken it from the list loaded with a=respr(32976) and saved back with : sexec ram1_crib_exe,a,32976,1 And it run quite well Ciao So it was what I believed. lost headers

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - crib

2002-10-30 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
Arnold Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ýãñáøå: Áðü: Arnold Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ðñïò: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ÈÝìá: Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs Çìåñïìçíßá:Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:37:16 - Arnold I am afraid that you need to zip them first

Re: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs - crib

2002-10-30 Thread .
??? 30/10/2002 6:54:59 ??, ?/? Fabrizio Diversi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??: I forgot a statement : Crib work using my copy of QPC 3.03, I taken it from the list loaded with - a=respr(32976) - lbytes ram1_crib,a and saved back with : - sexec

RE: [ql-users] Turbo Compiled Programs

2002-10-29 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Rich, if the 'executable' is something like Visual Basic, or any of the .NET stuff, or JAVA, then I believe that it can be done quite simply - because these langauages are interptreted (regardless of what MicxroSoft say on the matter). If the executable is a proper executable which was