The original idea was to write the parser in archive but in view of the
feedback I think we had better think again.
Perhaps SuperBasic might be better.
Any thoughts?
- Original Message -
From: "Claude Mourier 00" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:52
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jms1 schrieb:
> The original idea was to write the parser in archive but in view of
> the feedback I think we had better think again. Perhaps SuperBasic
> might be better. Any thoughts?
SuperBASIC would be **much** better!
wolfgang
-BEGIN PGP S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> SuperBASIC would be **much** better!
>
I once wrote a parser and syntax evaluator, in SuperBasic (and I think,
converted it to C68) for a project many years ago - which died a horrible death.
The project was code named 'ARSE' and stood for ARchive Syntax Evaluator.
