With all the talk about passing mail through serialline: When does a
message with multiple recipients get split?
More precisely, following TOISP in the serialmail package: Is the
message already split when it is in ~alias/pppdir/, or they get split
after (by maildirsmtp?!).
Thx
Mate
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 08:20:32PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:42:03PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Now that I think of it, QMQP won't give your users the instant gratification
> > they're looking for (i.e. not having to wait for the entire message to be
> > transferr
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:42:03PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:04:20PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:57:30PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> > > > Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> > > > together, to
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:29:45 -0800, Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The MAIL=$HOME/Maildir environment variable in my /etc/profile is set
>and verified.
I think this should be MAIL=$HOME/Maildir/ with an ending slash.
Regards
Mirko
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] myhome_aka_~:http://sites.in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What if these "legitimate" users wanted to send mail to my customers using some
> > oddball protocol someone made up? The mail can be just as legitimate, but why
> > do I have to start putting up servers for every protocol someone wants to make?
>
> Isn't that a _to
We've setup a external qmail-1.03 BSDI machine to relay
email in/out to an internal ccMail machine.
Mail from the internet happily flows to the ccMail machine.
However mail from ccMail to qmail-smtpd is never correctly
received and processed.
Is this a known problem? Are there any fixes or pat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> There is even less I can do about your PTT than you can do about it. Well, I
> suppose I could start a protest in front of your country's embassy in the US.
> But I doubt if that would have any more effect than reducing my bank account
> by the co
Text written by Racer X at 02:03 PM 1/28/99 -0800:
>Has anyone else been receiving multiple copies of any messages to the
>list? I seem to be getting multiple copies (like 3 or 4) of any message
>that's sent to the list as well as to me.
Yeah, I've gotten about 3 or 4 copies of Len Budney's sati
>Now that I think of it, QMQP won't give your users the instant gratification
>they're looking for (i.e. not having to wait for the entire message to be
>transferred over the phone line). Since with mini-qmail there's no local
queue,
>they're still going to have to wait until the message is queued
cap writes:
> > consider compressing your outgoing email. In principle, it's possible
> > to write a program which collates messages out of a maildir (after
> > it's been put there by a wildcard smtproute delivering into the
> > maildir), compresses them, uploads them to your server, decompresse
An interesting side-note I thought I'd add, qmail-inject from the command
line works perfectly. Using qmail-inject the message goes to
~bob/Maildir/new the way it's suppose to. So the question still stands, how
do I configure qmail-smtpd to place mail where it's supposed to?
The SMTP entry in m
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:04:20PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:57:30PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> > > Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> > > together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
> > > this situ
On 28 Jan 99 at 22:12, Richard Letts wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Racer X wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else been receiving multiple copies of any messages to the
> > list? I seem to be getting multiple copies (like 3 or 4) of any message
> > that's sent to the list as well as to me.
>
> no, I'm not
Hmmm Maybe I can play with it and turn it into a real tarpit, I am rather
rough when it comes to C programing, let me take a look when I get it. Also
what do you mean by hosts.allow, I have come up to speed on qmail pretty
quickly, but I don't remember any mention of hosts.allow
> -Original
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Racer X wrote:
> Has anyone else been receiving multiple copies of any messages to the
> list? I seem to be getting multiple copies (like 3 or 4) of any message
> that's sent to the list as well as to me.
no, I'm not getting that problem, however I'm seeing loads of email t
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:04:06PM -0500, Joe Garcia wrote:
} Hey some of us youngins weren't around for the low bandwidth (modem) email
} days, which is what UUCP was created for. I couldn't even begin to tell you
} how to set up UUCP it my life depended on it. >:) The funny part about
} this
> On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:57:30PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> > Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> > together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
> > this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
>
> In those situations in
Hey some of us youngins weren't around for the low bandwidth (modem) email
days, which is what UUCP was created for. I couldn't even begin to tell you
how to set up UUCP it my life depended on it. >:) The funny part about
this is that I am old enough to remeber a pre-web Internet.
Anyw
Has anyone else been receiving multiple copies of any messages to the
list? I seem to be getting multiple copies (like 3 or 4) of any message
that's sent to the list as well as to me.
If no one else has had this problem, feel free to ignore. I don't have
any mail filters set up but I suppose it
> > Question two. Can someone suggest a way that I can get qmail to do
> > tarpitting, or at least point me to a good wrapper to do tarpitting??
>
> John Levine has such a thing. He's deep in the throes of finishing a
> book, and I don't know if he kibos, so I'll CC: him just to get his
> att
>
> Mark Carpenter writes:
> > Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> > together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
> > this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
>
> Well, if bandwidth is really at a premium at your site, y
Please don't use postfix, as if I remember correctly it is not OSS in the
sense that anytime IBM feels like it they can tell you to buy it or stop
using it.in other words they let everybody on the internet help add
little tidbits to it then they can say to you...well pay for this or stop
usi
What has this got to do with this subject thread?? Please create you own
subject thread so as not to confuse the others.
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott D. Yelich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 4:32 PM
> To: Joe Garcia
> Cc: qmail-general
> Subject:
I just started learning Linux last week and am installing a few internet
services to include qmail.
When I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] my /etc/maillog reports that
everything went fine, however when I try to retrieve the email using
POP3 I have no messages. And when I look in /home/bob/Ma
Is the list slow today?
I have a system where qmail-popup has been working fine...
inetd sez:
pop3 stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
qmail-popup spy.org /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d
Maildir
Now whenever I try to use pop, even with an account with
Having the client dump straight to the ISP via SMTP is my top
choice at the moment. The fact that the client machine couldn't
just dump the mail and then be able to log-off isn't going over very
well, though. Sending a large file at the end of the day would keep
the person from logging off for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> >together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
> >this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
>
> If qmail doesn't fit, try Postfix. It's still beta, though.
On 28-Jan-99 Cristiano Lincoln Mattos wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating a Solaris 2.5.1 box from Sendmail to
> qmail 1.03.. i have had no problems, with delivery to normal
> accounts, up until now. We have a large /etc/aliases file,
> which we want to keep.. so i installed fastforward, t
> > Question two. Can someone suggest a way that I can get qmail to do
> > tarpitting, or at least point me to a good wrapper to do tarpitting??
>
> What's tarpitting?
Tarpitting is when a spammer tries to send a bunch, say 100,000, of mail
messages through your server. When that spammer reach
Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Further, so that such mails aren't dropped by "BCC filters", a header
> > must always be introduced which includes the recipient address. I
> > suggest "Resent-to".
>
> Ok. So the spammer will put a Resent-To header in his mails. Not too hard
> to do,
Joe Garcia writes:
> What is the ETA of the book nowadays Russell??
Depends on the production schedule and all, so I have no authoritative
information. I'd guess some time in August, assuming that johnl and I
stick to our part of the schedule.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://cry
Hi,
I am migrating a Solaris 2.5.1 box from Sendmail to
qmail 1.03.. i have had no problems, with delivery to normal
accounts, up until now. We have a large /etc/aliases file,
which we want to keep.. so i installed fastforward, to handle
it. All works fine, except for one problem: if t
Joe Garcia writes:
> Question one. If I set up ~/control/me to read foo.bar for all servers in a
> multi-server environment (more that one host doing relay for a domain) is it
> possible to screw up the message id, or should I not use ~/control/me and
> set up idhost, domainhost, etc. individ
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 03:44:19PM -0500, Joe Garcia wrote:
> Question one. If I set up ~/control/me to read foo.bar for all servers in a
> multi-server environment (more that one host doing relay for a domain) is it
> possible to screw up the message id, or should I not use ~/control/me and
> se
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have this in my inetd.conf
>
> smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/sbin/tcpd
> /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
If this is actually how it looks in your /etc/inetd.conf file, your
problem is that it's not all
What is the ETA of the book nowadays Russell??
Kai MacTane writes:
> Text written by Len Budney at 05:07 PM 1/27/99 -0500:
> >
> >Does any non-spammer routinely include >25 (or even >5) BCC's in a
> >message? The only exception I can think of is corporate email, which,
> >of course, is immune to such rules since the corporate mail server
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 03:31:53PM -0500, Len Budney wrote:
> Kai MacTane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Text written by Len Budney at 05:07 PM 1/27/99 -0500: Does any
> > >non-spammer routinely include >25 (or even >5) BCC's in a message?
> > >The only exception I can think of is corporate email,
Question one. If I set up ~/control/me to read foo.bar for all servers in a
multi-server environment (more that one host doing relay for a domain) is it
possible to screw up the message id, or should I not use ~/control/me and
set up idhost, domainhost, etc. individually??
Question two. Can som
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if bandwidth is really at a premium at your site, you should
> consider compressing your outgoing email.
That recalls something I've pondered lately. Why not implement a
QMQP-like protocol in which the "data" portion of the exchange is
compressed
Mark Carpenter writes:
> Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
> this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
Well, if bandwidth is really at a premium at your site, you should
consi
Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have this in my inetd.conf
>
> smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/sbin/tcpd
> /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
Are the two lines above on one line in inetd.conf?
Have you looked in syslog and/or messages ? There may be some
i
Kai MacTane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Text written by Len Budney at 05:07 PM 1/27/99 -0500: Does any
> >non-spammer routinely include >25 (or even >5) BCC's in a message?
> >The only exception I can think of is corporate email, which, of
> >course, is immune to such rules since the corporate ma
> And by the way, what is an MX?
.Ah "How a client finds a server"
An SMTP client can choose an SMTP server several ways. The most
common way is that the SMTP client found delivery information in the
domain name system (DNS -- http://www.crynwr.com/rfc1035/). An SMTP
client can look up the m
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 12:23:45PM -0800, Ramesh Vadlapatla wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am trying to follow the instructions on your web site to start a
> > qmail-pop3d.
> > But when I use the below command, I get a message saying that the port
> > is already in use.
> >
> > I do not have a qmail-
> Hello!
>
> I am trying to follow the instructions on your web site to start a
> qmail-pop3d.
> But when I use the below command, I get a message saying that the port
> is already in use.
>
> I do not have a qmail-pop3d running. So how can I find out what is
> already running on that port and how
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:57:30PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
> together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
> this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
In those situations in which you'r
Text written by Len Budney at 05:07 PM 1/27/99 -0500:
>
>Does any non-spammer routinely include >25 (or even >5) BCC's in a
>message? The only exception I can think of is corporate email, which,
>of course, is immune to such rules since the corporate mail server can
>handle them appropriately.
Ye
- Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| I have this in my inetd.conf
| [...]
I think the only standard response you get from this list these days
to that kind of question is "Don't use inetd, use tcpserver instead."
(For qmail-smtpd, that is, not necessarily all services.) It's to be
found in the
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [forcing legitimate users to call you, cause u don't accept mail from
> > them]
>
> What if these "legitimate" users wanted to send mail to my customers using some
> oddball protocol someone made up? The mail can be ju
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
>together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
>this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
If qmail doesn't fit, try Postfix. It's still beta, though. See
www.postfi
Thanks. I was affraid of that. Drat! I finally got everything working
together, too. Any suggestions for a package that would be good in
this situation. The boss isn't going to let that fly.
8<---snip
> > splits it. Is there any way around this? We often send messages
> > with attachments and
Scott D. Yelich writes:
> Is there any way to *easily* debug or trace checkpassword to
> see what it is doing and why it thinks that authorization has
> failed?
Yes. You can use the instructions on http://www.qmail.org/top.html#checkpassword
to discern whether the problem is in the pop setup
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:21:39PM +, Mark Carpenter wrote:
> I've looked through the archives for this problem. I gather that there
> is nothing I can do about it, but I want to be sure we're talking
> about the same thing.
>
> I am using qmail with a dial-up ISP who isn't running qmail. I
I have not changed my system or qmail -- yet, my qmail has
stopped working. I'm seeing that I can connect to qmail-popup
and give the user USER and pass PASS commands, but it always
tells me that the authorization failed. I have tested the same
user and password combinations with FTP and they
>On 27 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> If you don't understand a term or phrase you read, trust me, you
>> *have* to go find its definition before you proceed.
>
>Where can I find definitions for this stuff? Are there any
>mailing lists, FAQs, RFCs I should look at? And by the way,
>what is
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:20:14 +0100 (MET)
[snip]
> Hopefully, you do say that you don't allow the sending of SPAM from your
I say no such thing, since i don't have customers. :-)
> customers. You can then route
I've looked through the archives for this problem. I gather that there
is nothing I can do about it, but I want to be sure we're talking
about the same thing.
I am using qmail with a dial-up ISP who isn't running qmail. If I have
a message that has two different addresses in the "To:" field, q
Have your application exit with error 111 if the db server is down, qmail
will try the delivery again later.
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Michael Amster wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:58:27 -0800
> From: Michael Amster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hello All,
I have this in my inetd.conf
smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/sbin/tcpd
/var/qmail/bin/tcp-env /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
This makes it so that hosts.allow file is used to allow boxes to send mail
to this box. Although now I cannot send anything to the box. It gives me
Hi:
We are writing an application which takes mail and uses a database to do
some operations before delivery. If the database server is down (it
happens), we'd like to defer the mail rather than build a temporary
queue. What's the best way to defer an incoming mail without causing
bounces? Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We _offer_ what we offer. We do not have to say "we do not offer ..." and
> > list those things that we do not offer. We don't offer donuts and coffee
> > delivery in the morning, but we don't have to put that in the contract.
>
> Off course. But Don't u offer mail
Is lakesedge.org also in control/locals, by chance? If so, take it out and HUP
qmail-send.
Chris
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 08:43:06AM +, Chris Naden wrote:
> Hi; I've managed, after some help from various members
> of this list (primarily Mate) to get qmail set up and running,
> and it's
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:28:45AM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> /sbin/ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -S 10.0.0.0/8 -D default/0 25 -r 25
>
> Now, anything they try to send to port 25 anywhere will be intercepted by qmail
> on your firewall and you can filter it out yourselves only allowing outgoi
> > /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d ./ &
blah!
my previously working checkpassword just stopped working. How strange.
I'm sure it's something other than checkpassword, but since I can log
in, I wonder what it could be that is making checkpassword fail. Has
anyone else experienc
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:28:45AM -0600, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:20:14 +0100 (MET)
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > That's not what we are discussing. I'm not paying you to receive my mai
> > l,
> > > > yo
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:51:28PM +0100, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> anybody has a script for converting (or resending) netscape mail messages to
> qmail format. The netscape mail messages are also in some kind of Maildir
> format, but when I change the name to (timestamp).$$.`hostname` and
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 10:49:13AM +0100, Martin Staael wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have this configuration - starting qmail-pop3d
>
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup qmail.xx.net \
> /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d ./ &
>
> I have this user list that checkpassw
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > That's not what we are discussing. I'm not paying you to receive my mail,
> > > > your users are paying you, so that they can receive _their_ mail. Either
> > > > them come from dial-up or not.
> > >
> > > There are some services we choose to
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:20:14 +0100 (MET)
>
> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > That's not what we are discussing. I'm not paying you to receive my mai
> l,
> > > your users are paying you, so that they can receive _their_ mail. Eithe
> r
> > > t
Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> anybody has a script for converting (or resending) netscape mail messages to
> qmail format. The netscape mail messages are also in some kind of Maildir
> format, but when I change the name to (timestamp).$$.`hostname` and
> I try reading them (using POP3), I get th
When I say Netscape mail messages, I mean this on the server side. There
each message is stored seperately in a users Inbox, ready for POP3. Is that
also mailbox format?
> --
> From: Sam[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 5:06 PM
> Cc: '[EMAIL PRO
Van Liedekerke Franky writes:
> Hi,
>
> anybody has a script for converting (or resending) netscape mail messages to
> qmail format. The netscape mail messages are also in some kind of Maildir
> format, but when I change the name to (timestamp).$$.`hostname` and
> I try reading them (using POP3)
Hi,
anybody has a script for converting (or resending) netscape mail messages to
qmail format. The netscape mail messages are also in some kind of Maildir
format, but when I change the name to (timestamp).$$.`hostname` and
I try reading them (using POP3), I get the correct number of messages, but
> > > That's not what we are discussing. I'm not paying you to receive my mail,
> > > your users are paying you, so that they can receive _their_ mail. Either
> > > them come from dial-up or not.
> >
> > There are some services we choose to offer to our customers and there are
> > some services t
At 7:51 am -0600 on 28/1/99, the great Mate Wierdl wrote:
>
>| bouncesaying "Pete is a bad boy, and cannot receive mail"
>
more to the point - I hate being called pete and it amuses me no end that
some spammers have picked up 'pete' rather than 'peter'
thanks
Peter
--
gradwell dot com ltd -
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 08:30:37AM +, Peter Gradwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently aquired control of a new domain and am supporting it under qmail.
>
> My boss wants me to accept mail for all addresses at saiddomain.com and
> deliver them to person x (which is easy using a .qmail-default)
> venus:/var/qmail/bin# /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R
> -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
> -c100 -u7791 -g2108 0 smtp \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
> [1] 30531
>
> Tcpserver runs and goes into background...
>
> When a SMTP connection is established...
>
> venus:/var/qmail/bin# tcpserver: warning: d
Hi All,
Thanks for the help on setting up the virtual hosting, that is now
working,
However the tcpserver refuses to run, with the configuration below, the
paths exist everythin runs when inetd calls qmail-smtpd direct.
venus:/var/qmail/bin# /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 01:08:30PM +, Petr Novotny wrote:
> > That should be:
> >
> > |exit 100
>
> What about
> |bouncesaying 'This address no longer accepts mail'
> inside the .qmail file
> (man bouncesaying)
That will only work with qmail 1.03. That guy didn't tell us what version
of qm
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > That's not what we are discussing. I'm not paying you to receive my mail,
> > your users are paying you, so that they can receive _their_ mail. Either
> > them come from dial-up or not.
>
> There are some services we choose to offer to our custome
> That should be:
>
> |exit 100
What about
|bouncesaying 'This address no longer accepts mail'
inside the .qmail file
(man bouncesaying)
--
Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.antek.cz
-- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 09:34:03AM +0100, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> Perhaps:
>
> exit 100
That should be:
|exit 100
Musn't forget the pipe.
--
Anand
System Administrator
Africa Online Ltd
http://www.anand.org
qmail Digest 28 Jan 1999 11:00:09 - Issue 534
Topics (messages 20978 through 21042):
qmail-lint-0.51
20978 by: Peter Haworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
again: maildir question: why chdir()?
20979 by: Uwe Ohse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mailbox size question
20980 by: Abel Lucano
Hi
I have this configuration - starting qmail-pop3d
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
qmail.xx.net \
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d ./ &
I have this user list that checkpassword should follow
#xx: /var/qmail/users > cat assign
=martin:martin:1120:0:/webdi
try putting
> lakesedge.org: alias-leorg
>
in virtualdomains.
Let me know if it works then...
> --
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 9:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Virtual domains using qmail
>
>
Hi; I've managed, after some help from various members
of this list (primarily Mate) to get qmail set up and running,
and it's delivering localhost messages very well. However;
The test domain that I'm using as a virtual domain is
lakesedge.org ; the files that are relevant are, as I
un
Perhaps:
exit 100
if I'm not mistaking...
> --
> From: Peter Gradwell[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 9:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bouncing specific users
>
> Hi,
>
> I've recently aquired
Hi,
I've recently aquired control of a new domain and am supporting it under qmail.
My boss wants me to accept mail for all addresses at saiddomain.com and
deliver them to person x (which is easy using a .qmail-default) but we want
to reject a specific address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do I put in
If you don't wan't an extra local account:
put virtual.com only in control/rcpthosts.
Then in virtualdomains, put the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alias-user1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alias-user2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alias-user3
virtual.com:alias-virtual
and use the alias files in control/alias:
.qmail-us
Hello,
i need your advice to build a splitted email system:
server 1 (run qmail and is MX for several domains):
- get inbound external email
- filter with antispam/UCE/relay rules and allow post only to
defined users ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not
chown alias to the output file made a big difference after a few edits to
the script in the .qmail-alias file. All is well (on this one!)
Thanks for all your help :)
Samuel
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> On 27-Jan-99 Samuel Dries-Daffner wrote:
> >
> > Well now I am seeing
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:33:02PM -0500, Len Budney wrote:
> James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Selective filtering is ALL about pattern-matching.
>
> Correct, which is why it is flawed. If pattern matching were applied
> uniformly, then soon all spam will be 100% 822-compliant, an
93 matches
Mail list logo
