On Wed, 12 May 1999, Walter Danielsen wrote:
> hello,
> we started running a qmailer in a DMZ on a dedicated host to only
> forward Mail coming from the Internet to a Postoffice, set in the
> sheltered LAN on another host. (This PO uses a separate Domain).
> Whenever we mail from the outside, th
hello,
we started running a qmailer in a DMZ on a
dedicated host to only forward Mail coming from the Internet to a Postoffice,
set in the sheltered LAN on another host. (This PO uses a separate Domain).
Whenever we mail from the outside, the mail is correctly forwarded to qmail via
MX-Rec
I'm seeing a strange interaction between netscape, tcpserver and
identd lookups.
I finally got around to running qmail-smtpd from tcpserver on Monday
night.
Details:
Operating system= Solaris 2.5.1
Qmail version = 1.03 (no patches)
daemontools = 0.53 (no patches)
Hello,
I just set up qmail, and I'm wondering how to get fetchmail to run w/ it.
I'm using fetchmail to get messages from a remote server via pop3.
Unfortunately, since my rcpthosts file is set to only accept connections
from my local machine, fetchmail complains that it can't send the messages
On Tue, 11 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm developing some sort of database which should keep all messages
> with a given subject (like listserver, but in the database would go
> all the messages with given subject).
> I wrote parser (PERL) to do it (pipe-driven).
> Now the question is:
>
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Claudiu Balciza wrote:
> there are some messages waiting in the queue for a long time.
> how can I delete them ?
you may use qmHandle avaliable on http://www.qmail.org
Bye.Olli.
hi. at www.qmail.org(/top.html), there is a mention of a patch to
qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d to make the log stuff to splogger, but the link is
broken (it points to http://www.pharos.com.au/mbp/). anyone have any idea
where i can pick this patch up? any help would be greatly appreciated!
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 02:30:25PM -0600, New Hope Hostmaster wrote:
> pop-3 stream tcp nowait root /var/qmail/bin qmail-popup
^
> /var/qmail/bin checkpasswd /var/qmail/bin qmail-pop3d
^ ^
You ne
I have been struggling with setting up Qmail to work on my Linux box. I can
send email from the machine, and at one point could send email to a valid
email address on that machine, although that is not working now, but that's
as far as I can get.
I've been through lots of docs, and I'm not sure
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Jonathan W Herbert wrote:
> I could be entirely wrong, but do the limitations of pop3 make
> virtualhosting mail somewhat impossible?
>
> The difficulty seems to come from the lack of a suitable identifier
> from which to discern the corresponding domain name in the
> conver
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Jonathan W Herbert wrote:
> I could be entirely wrong, but do the limitations of pop3 make
> virtualhosting mail somewhat impossible?
>
> The difficulty seems to come from the lack of a suitable identifier
> from which to discern the corresponding domain name in the
> conver
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 09:06:38AM -0700, Jonathan W Herbert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I could be entirely wrong, but do the limitations of pop3 make
> virtualhosting mail somewhat impossible?
>
> The difficulty seems to come from the lack of a suitable identifier
> from which to discern the correspon
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 06:25:49PM +0200, DUGRES Hugues, I.T. manager at C.Q.E. wrote:
> I have a very strange bug using qmail...
>
> Here is a very breif description of my configuration.
>
> In my lan, I use 3 qmail servers running under Linux. It works great ;-) !
> Whenever an e-mail is not i
I have a very strange bug using qmail...
Here is a very breif description of my configuration.
In my lan, I use 3 qmail servers running under Linux. It works great ;-) !
Whenever an e-mail is not internal to my company, the email is processed on
a separate mail server that is located in a DMZ. T
System: SUSE Linux, qmail 1.03
Is it possible to set up qmail in such a fashion that it routes messages, eg. to my
address [EMAIL PROTECTED] not to our normal mail server inside the LAN but directly to
another host? This would have to be definable on a per-user basis.
Currently all mail for tec
Try the addresses in the following order:
name@domain
name%domain
name_domain
For any given MUA, one of them should work. (I believe that Netscape
required the "%" syntax.)
The documentation included with vchkpw also talks about this issue.
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Jonathan W Herbert wrote:
> He
Hello,
I could be entirely wrong, but do the limitations of pop3 make
virtualhosting mail somewhat impossible?
The difficulty seems to come from the lack of a suitable identifier
from which to discern the corresponding domain name in the
conversation between pop3 client and server.
One solution
> From: "Fred Lindberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 09:44:48 -0500
>
> On 11 May 1999 00:10:35 -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
>
> >Let's say a user clicks the ``unsubscribe'' button while he's looking at
> >an old message from the SOS mailing list. What should the MUA do?
> >
>
pine.conf is now under /etc. But it seems that one does not have to
specify
sendmail-path=/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi -t
anymore. This is version 4.10 of pine.
Mate
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
On 11 May 1999 00:10:35 -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
>Let's say a user clicks the ``unsubscribe'' button while he's looking at
>an old message from the SOS mailing list. What should the MUA do?
>
>RFC 2369 suggests that the MUA follow the List-Unsubscribe instructions
>in that message. But what
+ "Claudiu Balciza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| there are some messages waiting in the queue for a long time.
| how can I delete them ?
You can bounce them immediately by a sort of backwards FAQ 7.3: Just
make the message older than one week (GNU touch is handy for this).
If you want to delete them w
there are some messages waiting in the queue for a long time.
how can I delete them ?
TIA
Claudiu
Jari Tenhunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Has anyone succesfully configured selective relay with tcp_wrappers ??
Yes, but it's not supported. One problem is that tcp_wrappers has to
be built with a certain non-default option for it to work.
>Or do I have to install tcpserver ??
That *will* w
hello,
i have set up a .qmail-list to redirect some messages, i would like the
recipients to be able de make a reply directed onto this generic address and
not the original sender...
for this i would like to change or set the REPLY-TO field of the incoming
messages. I looked into the FAQ, and t
On the qmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Jason wrote:
>> [...] if it fails trying to send to the first host (10.1.1.1),
>> qmail will try sending it to the second host (10.1.1.2)
>
>No.
Could be useful ... wouldn't it be easy, though, since MXs
already
Hi!
I'm developing some sort of database which should keep all messages
with a given subject (like listserver, but in the database would go
all the messages with given subject).
I wrote parser (PERL) to do it (pipe-driven).
Now the question is:
Where I could stick the parser so it would inter
qmail Digest 11 May 1999 10:00:00 - Issue 637
Topics (messages 25395 through 25435):
configuration questions
25395 by: Achim Gosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
25396 by: Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
qmail-smtpd start error!
25397 by: Achim Gosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
qm
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
> 1) Make sure tcp-wrappers are installed. Mine were I'm using RedHat 5.1
> with kernel 2.034
they are.
> 2) You must modify your inetd.conf as specified in the FAQ. I used inetd I
> did not use TCP wrappers
I made all the changes necessary as yo
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 02:33:10AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail-smtpd does *not* change the From: header. Your From: header is
probably being altered by qmail-inject. Read the man page to find out more
about header manipulation with qmail-inject.
> Qmail is changing the "From: " field i
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 08:34:54AM +0300, Claudiu Balciza wrote:
Send an ALRM signal to qmail-send. Since you're using Redhat, do this:
# killall -ALRM qmail-send
> (qmail 1.03/RedHat5.2/kernel 2.2.5)
>
> Hi,
>
> Whenever I tweak with my firewall rules, qmail fails to deliver messages
> (that
Qmail is changing the "From: " field in the header on all messages sent
out. The way I read the documentation, it is not supposed to do this.
Can anyone suggest what might be wrong?
Thanks,
Dick Kreutzer
AmeriCom Inc.
(qmail 1.03/RedHat5.2/kernel 2.2.5)
Hi,
Whenever I tweak with my firewall rules, qmail fails to deliver messages
(that's ok).
I can see them on the queue.
But when it retries to send those certain deffered messages it fails again.
I tried sending a new message with the exact to/from/subject/cont
David McCall wrote:
>
> suppose I want to get mail as root.
> is there a safe way other than routing it to another user?
mail to root goes to the alias user (as you obviously know...!)
I use mutt and have the following in my root user's .muttrc:
spoolfile='/var/qmail/alias/Maildir/'
So wh
33 matches
Mail list logo
