-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If I am [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I want to get all mail for
victim.org, what would happen in the following scenario:
I have root privliges for attacker.org, and for the purpose of attack I
will accept mail destined for victim.org.
I issue an
qmail Digest 3 Aug 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 717
Topics (messages 28454 through 28487):
Internet draft for VERP
28454 by: "D. J. Bernstein" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M$ Exchange - qmail
28455 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28456 by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28459 by: Dave Sill [EMAIL
Hello all,
Still trying to get tcpserver to run two qmail-pop3d's on one machine. The
host name is mail.f-tech.net and I have an eth0 (207.44.65.16) and eth0:0
(vmail.f-tech.net 207.44.65.14). .16 is a "real" domain, .14 is for
vchkpw and virtual domains.
No matter what I do it seems that
I know this question has been asked before, in sometimes quite violent
threads, but I'll ask again anyway. We are looking to send high volume
bulk emails to customers. The emails will be personalized to each user.
Basically we're sending them out specific investment information which
they ask
Bruce Guenter writes in private email, forwarded with permission:
While testing the performance of a big todo directory, I observed that
qmail-qstat miscounted the number of messages in the todo directory.
The following trivial patch needs to be added to yours.
Thanks, Bruce. I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bash: ./qmail-queue: Operation not permitted
An Alta Vista search on "operation not permitted" yielded lots of
hits. It seems to be related to IP firewalls.
You might try "strace /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue" to see more detail
about where it's failing.
-Dave
Diana Dewi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody can help me? May be this problem ever ask before, I've got some
problem when get mail. I use tcpserver for POP3. And I've got error
message :
tcprules: fatal: unable to parse this line:
202.155.12.172:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Where are you seeing this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You might try "strace /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue" to see more detail
about where it's failing.
But can you strace a suid binary as a normal user? I think not. The
solution I came up with was to strace "setuser user
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue" as
Cris Daniluk writes:
My question then is, in your honest, semi-unbiased opinions, do you
think we would see *significant* results by switching to a qmail
environment?
You'll be floored by the results, although I would put the queue on
its own SCSI drive. Your reaction will be "Why was I
I'm running Linux Slackware 2.0.35, I have been running Qmail on three
other machines now just over a year. Right now I run Qmail mail from
inetd and had been working great. I only wanted to install tcpserver
because of the spam filtering I could do with it.
I installed Qmail 1.03(tarball), and
This is what I get.
tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
13255 p1 S0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-vpop3d tcpserver -c100 -u0
-g0 207.44.65.14 pop-3 qmail-popup 207.44.65.14 /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
qmail-vpop3d
13307 p1 S0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-vpop3d
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 08:54:21AM -0700, Bob Ross wrote:
I'm running Linux Slackware 2.0.35, I have been running Qmail on three
other machines now just over a year. Right now I run Qmail mail from
inetd and had been working great. I only wanted to install tcpserver
because of the spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
13255 p1 S0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-vpop3d tcpserver -c100 -u0
-g0 207.44.65.14 pop-3 qmail-popup 207.44.65.14 /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
qmail-vpop3d
13307 p1 S0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-vpop3d tcpserver -c100 -u0
-g0
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Bob Ross wrote:
I'm running Linux Slackware 2.0.35, I have been running Qmail on three
other machines now just over a year. Right now I run Qmail mail from
inetd and had been working great. I only wanted to install tcpserver
because of the spam filtering I could do with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm running Linux Slackware 2.0.35, I have been running Qmail on three
other machines now just over a year. Right now I run Qmail mail from inetd
and had been working great. I only wanted to install tcpserver because of
the spam filtering I could
Dumb mistake.. I only added a the IP to the 2nd instance of pop3d,
forgetting the first.. which was still set to bind to all ip's (ie the 0
was still there). Put the hostname on both tcpserver lines and its in
there!
Thanks for all the helpyou're on the christmas card list!
Paul D. Farber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are you absolutely sure about that path? Is
checkpasswd in /var/qmail/bin or /bin? I don't run it, it just doesn't
look right.
It's wherever you copy it to. There's not make install in the makefile
(or at least there hasn't
I made a change to the spelling of password thanks for catching that.
When I telnet to localhost 110 I get the +OK 110.numbers.domain name
then I enter quit to get out.
I also found that tcpserver does not start from the rc.local file, I
have to run it manually, I did check and rc.local is
I have run test loads on QMAIL inbound delivery (messages were identical
1000 bytes plus 300+ bytes of header) where we exceeding 1200 emails per
minute (20 per second) on a single 400Mhz Intel uniprocessor Unix system
(I did not increase the lspawn limit from its default). To drive the
test we
Daemeon Reiydelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the bottleneck will be your internet pipe, ...
Probably the spool disk, unless you've got multiple boxes flooding the
pipe.
Either FB or Linux will build qmail with ease and works fine.
True, but if one or the other handles 1024 file
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Cris Daniluk wrote:
question then is, in your honest, semi-unbiased opinions, do you think
we would see *significant* results by switching to a qmail
environment? Also, should this be so, which operating system should we
be running qmail under? Which is the most "qmail
Greetings.
I just put a revised supervise-pipe patch up at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/rpms/daemontools/supervise-pipe.diff
This fixes a bug that would cause supervise to not re-write the status
file when exiting after terminating its supervised children (ie, after
running "svc -dx") such that
At 02:32 PM 8/3/99 -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Daemeon Reiydelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either FB or Linux will build qmail with ease and works fine.
True, but if one or the other handles 1024 file descriptors so
concurrencyremote can go over 256, that would be a major plus since
the hardware
Is there anywhere to find the qmail source tarballs besides koobera?
Someone seems to have done something bad to the ftp server there.
Thanks,
---sambo
On 03-Aug-99 Sammy Ominsky wrote:
Is there anywhere to find the qmail source tarballs besides koobera?
Someone seems to have done something bad to the ftp server there.
Try www/software on koobera. They were moved.
Vince.
--
Hi !
I am new to qmail and also to Linux admin (somewhat). I am running RH
6.0 on a P-133 machine with 64MB RAM.
My scenario is single machine with a dial up TCP IP link with my ISP
and multiple users. I wish to map all users to my email address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]); i.e., all non
David Villeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even with more than 1024 file descriptors, you can't have concurrencyremote
go over 256 without patching qmail.
You're right, I was confusing two issues: the concurrency remote limit
and insufficient file descriptors. Under older Linux kernels, the
Sammy Ominsky writes:
Is there anywhere to find the qmail source tarballs besides koobera?
Someone seems to have done something bad to the ftp server there.
There's a mirror at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/pub/koobera.math.uic.edu/
which uses a more conventional (translation: insecure) FTP server.
Dave Sill wrote:
Daemeon Reiydelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the bottleneck will be your internet pipe, ...
Probably the spool disk, unless you've got multiple boxes flooding the
pipe.
A couple of pieces. Performance tuning any system consists of finding
which of a series of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
There's a mirror at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/pub/koobera.math.uic.edu/
which uses a more conventional (translation: insecure) FTP server.
What do you mean insecure?
What's the deal with DJB's FTP with no LS and crazy
Scott D. Yelich writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
There's a mirror at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/pub/koobera.math.uic.edu/
which uses a more conventional (translation: insecure) FTP server.
What do you mean insecure?
Dan's
At 03:44 PM 8/3/99 -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
David Villeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even with more than 1024 file descriptors, you can't have concurrencyremote
go over 256 without patching qmail.
You're right, I was confusing two issues: the concurrency remote limit
and insufficient file
Dan's anonftpd chroots itself, and there's no way out. Crackers
simply cannot break authentication because there *is* no
authentication. Anybody can download only the files in the ftpd
directory. Anything else is less secure.
But giving Dan's anonftpd the binary label "secure" and
Russ Nelson wrote:
There's a mirror at ftp://ftp.qmail.org/pub/koobera.math.uic.edu/
which uses a more conventional (translation: insecure) FTP server.
Thankyaverrymuch.
Now, questions for the general population:
Following the instructions in Life With qmail, I'm at step 2.5.5; Do the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Dan's anonftpd chroots itself, and there's no way out. Crackers simply
cannot break authentication because there *is* no authentication.
Anybody can download only the files in the ftpd directory. Anything
else
Greg Hudson writes:
Dan's anonftpd chroots itself, and there's no way out. Crackers
simply cannot break authentication because there *is* no
authentication. Anybody can download only the files in the ftpd
directory. Anything else is less secure.
But giving Dan's anonftpd the
Hello,
I'm running qmail with serialmail and the ucspi-tcp program.
I likely don't have the aliases/control
set up right, but I can recieve mail. However when I try to deliver
mail, sometimes it works, sometimes
it doesn't. Since it's the same command, I can't tell what the
difference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
I didn't say anonftpd was secure. I said that the ftp server I'm
using was insecure (wuftpd -- check it out on www.rootshell.com), and
that by comparison, anonftpd was secure. Everything in the security
field is
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:40:44 +0200, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
1) Spam_friends support on smtp level not possible. Can be done
on a later level which means goodbye to rblsmtpd and hello to
a flooded postmaster mailbox.
Why not put it on a separate host/IP? Leave that open. Small specific
At 03:44 PM 8/3/99 -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
David Villeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even with more than 1024 file descriptors, you can't have
concurrencyremote
go over 256 without patching qmail.
You're right, I was confusing two issues: the concurrency remote limit
and insufficient file
I'm running Linux Slackware 2.0.35, I have been running Qmail on
three other machines now just over a year. Right now I run Qmail mail
from inetd and had been working great. I only wanted to install
tcpserver because of the spam filtering I could do with it.
I installed Qmail
Cris Daniluk writes:
I was under the impression that the "big" qmail patches by Russell would
increase this concurency level above 256.
No. The big-todo patch simply hashes the todo directories. It allows
you to inject email faster than qmail-send can process it, without
creating humongo
Scott D Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Dan's anonftpd chroots itself, and there's no way out. Crackers simply
cannot break authentication because there *is* no authentication.
Anybody can download only the files in the ftpd directory. Anything
[snip]
No, although you can run more than one instance of qmail on a machine
if it runs into that has a limit.
But, can you run 2 instances of qmail sharing the same queue? Or would you
have to create 2 separate queues and come up with a distributed method to
populate them?
Cris
If you're not going to stripe multiple volumes, why do you need a RAID
controller? Any decent OS these days with a UBC will cache as much data
as possible, so I would not expect too much more performance from a single
drive, and a modern OS.
FreeBSD with softupdates would probably work just
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:59:43PM -0400, Cris Daniluk wrote:
I have to throw in one more question, albeit somewhat off topic, it has
definite relevance. We're going to put in a raid controller with a hell of a
cache in it (64 mb probably). My question then is, what type of disk
configuration
Modern OS's also don't know things like drive geometry. Good caching
disk controllers do a better job of optimizing disk I/O. We've always
seen major improvements in disk I/O with DPT caching controllers over
just adding RAM to Linux. The OS has less 'dirty' buffers to track and
worry about as
Cris Daniluk writes:
No, although you can run more than one instance of qmail on a machine
if it runs into that has a limit.
But, can you run 2 instances of qmail sharing the same queue? Or would you
have to create 2 separate queues and come up with a distributed method to
populate
Hi all,
I'd installed Qmail 1.03 with Qmail-UCE patch. It's working fine except
virutal domain not works. I'd already set up a virtual domain as follow:
1. In my DNS
virt.domINMX10mail.mycompany.com
2. In control/rcpthosts, I'd aready added the folowing line:
virt.dom
3. In
Nguyen Dang Phuoc Dong writes:
virt.dom: myunixaccount
Check to make sure that, in your case, this account's home directory has
global read and execute permissions.
--
Sam
Nguyen Dang Phuoc Dong writes:
Hi all,
I'd installed Qmail 1.03 with Qmail-UCE patch. It's working fine except
virutal domain not works. I'd already set up a virtual domain as follow:
1. In my DNS
virt.domINMX10mail.mycompany.com
2. In control/rcpthosts,
Hello Sam,
Yes, it's exactly my problem. Thank you very much+ACE-
Best regards,
Dong
-Original Message-
From: Sam +ADw-mrsam+AEA-geocities.com+AD4-
Cc: Qmail List +ADw-qmail+AEA-list.cr.yp.to+AD4-
Date: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Qmail UCE +ACY- Virtualdomains
52 matches
Mail list logo
