On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 06:42:52AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
IMHO, qmail-pop3 should deny access to a Maildir if the home directory
it is stored in has the sticky bit set. It's consistent with
qmail-local, which will refuse to deliver mail to such a home
directory. I know, I know:
No
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 01:47:41PM +0100, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently administrating the mail delivery system on a
system as described in the subject, with 1GB of SDRAM and
100GB disk.
I'm using ReiserFS (which, BTW, is working very well). My
mailsystem receives
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:57:10AM +0200, Ruben van der Leij wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:43:01AM -0600, iv0 wrote:
Probably a petition to the orbs site by qmail admins to tell them
to make a factual test.
Orbs does test. It tries to relay a message back to itself. If that message
Hi,
They must be a easy way to do this, moving to something like vpopmail would
probably cause more problems. I've tried it before and they was very
little documentation.
Thanks,
Chris
At 07:53 AM 24/03/2000 -0600, iv0 wrote:
Chris Bond wrote:
Hi,
How can I add a header X-Deliver-To
Hi
this is to request help on canonical domain names setup for mail.
i have a client for whom we ahve setup canonical names for their branch
offices. the problem is that when a mail is send to a canonical doamin
email id the mail goes and resides into the main pop account of the
domain.
for
Hi,
I've just come across the turnmail on the qmail web site - it looks like
exactly like what I need. I've compiled serialmail and installed it
properly. I've tried quite a few things to get the script working but none
of them seem to work.
I'm starting pop3d at the moment with:
At 07:03 27/03/2000 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 12:31:02AM -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote:
ulimit -v 2048
csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc '
supervise /var/lock/qmail-smtpd tcpserver -v -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
-u$USERID -g$GROUPID 0 25 \
rblsmtpd
qmail Digest 27 Mar 2000 11:00:00 - Issue 953
Topics (messages 39078 through 39109):
Majordomo with qmail
39078 by: Hong Taeki
unsubscribe qmail
39079 by: Rich Ferguson
39080 by: Anthony Diaz
39103 by: Jankok, L. (dsc-pm)
Re: What is the maximal value
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:34:00PM +0530, System Administrator wrote:
Hi
this is to request help on canonical domain names setup for mail.
i have a client for whom we ahve setup canonical names for their branch
offices. the problem is that when a mail is send to a canonical doamin
email
I'm using qmail / vpopmail both latest versions.
I've set up my users/assign file to look like this.
+bbb.com-:bbb.com:1007:7004:/export/home/vpopmail/domains/bbb.com:-::
+aaa.com-:aaa.com:1007:7004:/export/home/vpopmail/domains/bbb.com:-::
.
Basically I want all mail coming in addressed
Hi there
Could somone please tell me the qmail-ldap mailing list subscribe
address as the archives have x'd out the address.
--
Shaun Gibson
Associate Unix and NT System Adminstrator Tel :
My mail server has several names... There is the name that is in the
HOSTNAME file and there are the names assoaited to it in my DNS.
the hostname is tar-valon.pds2k.com
other names in the dns are...
mail.pds2k.com
www.pds2k.com
ftp.pds2k.com
Should I put the mail.pds2k.com in the ' me ' '
I'm using ReiserFS (which, BTW, is working very well). My
mailsystem receives 70'000 mails a day and the throughput
is just about twice that. Average mails sent per second
varies around 70-170 mails.
Uhm.. with 86400 seconds to a day, your average throughpout should be
about 2mails/sec.
Andreas Aardal Hanssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I also removed some unnessecary fsync()s as they were
slowing down everything very much...
Be careful; if you mean that you've removed fsync()s from Dan's code,
then you have definitely thrown away reliability in order to gain
throughput. In
I was asked to administer a site of a organization, and the homepage of the
organization is already running (Www.site.or.id)
The organization site now is hosted at an ISP.
Now the organization want to have their own server (Server colocation) and
no longer use the ISP space.
The ISP only gave
...I also removed some unnessecary fsync()s as they were
slowing down everything very much...
Be careful; if you mean that you've removed fsync()s from Dan's code,
then you have definitely thrown away reliability in order to gain
throughput. In your application, is it
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:18:48PM -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote:
I was asked to administer a site of a organization, and the homepage of the
organization is already running (Www.site.or.id)
The organization site now is hosted at an ISP.
Now the organization want to have their own server (Server
Originally posted to the vchkpw list, thought someone here might know what
he's talking about.
Ben
--
"There is no spoon"
-- The Matrix
Sorry for the offtopic message...
But does anyone know how can i setup qmail to support the
user+something@domain feature of sendmail???
thanks
At 09:29 27/03/2000 -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:18:48PM -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote:
Change it to this:
staff A 192.168.1.1
MX 10 server
MX 20 my.isp.mail.service
Thanks for your answer, but, is it okay to have multiple A address which
point
On 27-Mar-2000, em9652015 wrote:
Mar 27 10:55:40 qmail qmail: 954129340.999824 delivery 12: deferral:
/bin/sh:_dot-forward:_command_not_found/
There's your answer. Install dot-forward.
Ronny
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:38:28PM -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote:
At 09:29 27/03/2000 -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:18:48PM -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote:
Change it to this:
staff A 192.168.1.1
MX 10 server
MX 20 my.isp.mail.service
Thanks for
Yes, we do it all the time.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Irwan Hadi wrote:
At 09:29 27/03/2000 -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:18:48PM -0700, Irwan Hadi wrote:
Change it to this:
staff A 192.168.1.1
MX 10 server
MX 20 my.isp.mail.service
2000-03-24 23:35:41.630688500 tcpserver: ok 24865
lake.erche.de:195.245.48.3:25
153.136.hh1.ip.foni.net:212.7.136.153::1373
# cat /etc/tcp.smtp
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
195.245.48.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Your entry will allow the complete class -c subnet of 195.245.48
Andreas Aardal Hanssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said I removed fsync()s from Dan's code? Please read my
closing and see if I've said that. You see, you're really
taking words out of my mouth.
Just FYI, the correct expression is ``putting words into my mouth'',
and I didn't do that. You
First, you complain about my where-did-you-get-that-from removing
of Dan Bernstein's fsync()s, then you advise me to mount my
queue-directory on a *ramdisk*
That means, if the power dies and the UPS short-circuits, all
the mail in the queue will be lost!
It was a turn of phrase -- he
Good day.
We're running Qmail as a mainline ISP mailserver.
Here's a few stats...
420,000 Email on the server.
27 Gig of disk space used for that Email.
66,000 local mailboxes.
300,000 Email delivered to local users/day.
200,000 Email delivered to remote sites/day.
600,000 POP mail accesses/day.
You need to tell us additional facts about the server that are relevant to the
question.
Eg, Is /var/qmail/queue on a separate partition?
What are the iostats like on each of the spindles?
How are you running qmail-smtpd?
what are your concurrency settings?
What pop server are you using?
I'm averaging 120,000+ emails (mostly mailing lists) a day on just an
Ultra 10 333Mhz, 512MB Ram, and IDE HD's, and it rarely shows more than
1-2% utilization, so, I'm not sure that helps, but maybe it gives you
some reference point to go on. It certainly seems your setup should be
running far
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:14:15AM -0700, H wrote:
I'm averaging 120,000+ emails (mostly mailing lists) a day on just an
Ultra 10 333Mhz, 512MB Ram, and IDE HD's, and it rarely shows more than
1-2% utilization, so, I'm not sure that helps, but maybe it gives you
some reference point to go on.
Very true, and it is.
-Hawke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:14:15AM -0700, H wrote:
I'm averaging 120,000+ emails (mostly mailing lists) a day on just an
Ultra 10 333Mhz, 512MB Ram, and IDE HD's, and it rarely shows more than
1-2% utilization, so, I'm not sure that
How much cache ram on that RAID array. 256MB would be a good start.
-jim
Hello,
I am running Qmail 1.03 with the LDAP patch from http://www.nrg4u.com
on a Solaris 2.6 box. LDAP is OpenLDAP 1.2.9 residing on the same
box.
The patch applies cleanly to the source, and I'm able to compile qmail
successfully. However, when I try to start qmail, I get:
bash-2.02#
You need to tell us additional facts about the server that are relevant to the
question.
Eg, Is /var/qmail/queue on a separate partition?
Yes, it is.
/dev/dsk/c2t5d1s68404669 5654879 266574468%/var/qmail
/dev/dsk/c2t5d0s643080643 21556631 2109320651%/mailhome
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 08:21:52AM +, Christopher Tarricone wrote:
My mail server has several names... There is the name that is in the
HOSTNAME file and there are the names assoaited to it in my DNS.
the hostname is tar-valon.pds2k.com
other names in the dns are...
mail.pds2k.com
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 08:36:13AM -0600, Ben Beuchler wrote:
Originally posted to the vchkpw list, thought someone here might know what
he's talking about.
Well qmail has this feature with the '-' instead of '+', and IIRC this
is configurable as well.
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk -
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Greg Moeller wrote:
We're running Qmail as a mainline ISP mailserver.
h... i only know qmail .. is Qmail a new version ? *loL*
^^^
-KoS
--
http://www.kos.li/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What other patches are you running? In particular, big-todo?
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions
What other patches are you running? In particular, big-todo?
Charles
--
I don't understand.
Solaris patches, or qmail patches?
As for qmail, I'm running it pretty much vanilla, no patches at all.
Greg
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:25:34AM -0600, Greg Moeller wrote:
You need to tell us additional facts about the server that are relevant to the
question.
Eg, Is /var/qmail/queue on a separate partition?
Yes, it is.
/dev/dsk/c2t5d1s68404669 5654879 266574468%/var/qmail
Hmm.
I don't think bigtodo is going to help much given that his todo is empty - at least
in the one sample we have.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:48:46AM -0600, Greg Moeller wrote:
What other patches are you running? In particular, big-todo?
Charles
--
I don't understand.
Solaris patches,
I have some domains with different names, but they are really the same
one. It's something like: my-domain.com, mydomain.com, my-domain.net,
mydomain.net...
It is possible to make each of the domains an alias of the "real one"
(in this case, "my-domain.com"). I'm using vpopmail, and I though
which is very large indeed. Is there something else significant on that partition?
The queue itself is taking 512Meg of space. The other thing there is a huge
log of pop accesses I was using to work out stats of how many pops per day.
So you can have upto 350 processes trying to do i/o
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:53:27 -0600,
Greg Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
G Normally it keeps up pretty good, but when there's heavy spamming it can
G start to get behind with between 10,000 and 20,000 Email in the queue.
If spamming is the main problem, have you looked into tarpitting?
I think the other thing is that his smtp concurrency via tcpserver is serving
a dual purpose in that it's providing enough concurrency for his internal people
as well as for MX traffic. That means it has to be set fairly high so that his
internal people always get a connection.
I'd be inclined
I have a qmail server up and running GREAT.. all is well..
BUT... I want to bring up another that will Que up mail should the real mail
server crash, need rebooting, Melt down to slag, or ETC..
Anyone have a how-to for that ?..
Many thanks in advance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I feel kinda weird replying to myself, but...
HELLO??? Anybody out there?
Regards;
Ricardo
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 07:20:18PM +, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
Well;
People... (Dan?) Is there any
Greg Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Cazabon wrote:
What other patches are you running? In particular, big-todo?
I don't understand.
Solaris patches, or qmail patches?
As for qmail, I'm running it pretty much vanilla, no patches at all.
Yes, I meant qmail patches. big-todo is
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:41:14 +0100 , "Ricardo Cerqueira" writes:
According to this snippet of rspawn's code...
switch(wait_exitcode(wstat))
{
case 0: break;
case 111: substdio_puts(ss,"ZUnable to run qmail-remote.\n"); return;
default: substdio_puts(ss,"DUnable to run
What are you using for logging? cyclog or syslog?
If you're not currently using cyclog, you might want to strongly consider
switching to it.
--Adam
Do you have ldap related control files? AFAIR, control/ldapserver must
exist.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, blair christensen wrote:
Hello,
I am running Qmail 1.03 with the LDAP patch from http://www.nrg4u.com
on a Solaris 2.6 box. LDAP is OpenLDAP 1.2.9 residing on the same
box.
The patch
Hello, I'm trying to configure my MX host running qmail 1.03 to pass all
incoming mails to another host that makes the local delivery.
While not solve this problem I can't migrate from Postfix to qmail, in
postfix I use a config file called "transports" and add a line like this :
domain.com
It's done through the smtproutes file. Do a
'man qmail-remote' for more info.
Rick McMillin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
Manager, Network Operations
I-Land Internet Services
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo D. Albano" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Do you have a user name and password set up in qmail control files to
access LDAP server? That user must have rights to read LDAP directory. Try
to query LDAP server using that username and password.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, blair christensen wrote:
Yeah, I do have those. I added the ones
For the username and password, what I would like to do, at least for
now, is to just perform an anonymous bind. How do I represent that in
the control files?
However, I have also tried using a username/password with which I can
successfully perform an ldapsearch against the db. qmail still
Nice!, I done and it work. Thankx.
I have a very simple question : How to reload postfix configuration (some
like restart all postfix daemons to reload the configurations files).
Bye
RDA.-
It's done through the smtproutes file. Do a
'man qmail-remote' for more info.
Rick McMillin
[EMAIL
I've just checked my qmail-ldap settings and found no username password
there :-). However, when I removed control/ldapserver qmail refused
to start saying "cannot start: hath the daemon spawn no fire?". Everything
went back to normal when I put control/ldapserver to its place.
So, I don't
Running qmail on Solaris 7+dotforward+fastforward+procmail into
/var/spool/mail/delivery. The log shows a successful delivery:
Mar 27 17:19:25 homer qmail: 954199165.667066 starting delivery 1: msg 377310 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 27 17:19:25 homer qmail: 954199165.667663 status: local
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:41:13PM -0600, Andy Walden wrote:
Nothing ever appears in /var/spool/mail. I have done this plenty of times
so I know its something stupid. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
a) an empty .qmail file
b) a program in a .qmail file exits 99.
c) "fastforward -p"
Do you have ldap related control files? AFAIR, control/ldapserver must
exist.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, blair christensen wrote:
Hello,
I am running Qmail 1.03 with the LDAP patch from http://www.nrg4u.com
on a Solaris 2.6 box. LDAP is OpenLDAP 1.2.9 residing on the same
box.
The patch
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Eric Dahnke wrote:
Hello List,
I've been a long time (relative) user of qmail, and now need to use several sendmail
machines.
HOWEVER, all I have to do is make it so that mail sent from those machines arrives
elsewhere as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL
61 matches
Mail list logo
