Steve Wolfe wrote:
snip
more. Whenever someone asks "how do I unsubscribe", even though the
instructions are at the bottom of the message, they generally get subjected
to quite a bit of public humiliation and mockery. The good side is that
other people on the list notice it, and realize
HelloI have installed qmail.but not very sure whether i have done
it properly.ifi telnet to port 25 it works but if i telnet to 110 ,I am
getting this error- ERR this user has no $homeMaildir .Do i have to
install maildirSuresh
On Sat, 20 May 2000, suresh wrote:
Hello
I have installed qmail.but not very sure whether i have done it properly.if
i telnet to port 25 it works but if i telnet to 110 ,I am getting this error
"- ERR this user has no $homeMaildir .Do i have to install maildir
you have to do
Kai MacTane:
People who are determined to be stupid seem to be:
a) 100% capable of being stupid, no matter how easy you try to make it
for them to be smart (or at least average); and
b) 100% incapable of being convinced that they're being stupid. They
will rationalize and justify
Racer X:
from mailing lists for sending unsub requests to the list. maybe we
could set up a blacklist of mailing list morons and ban them from every
mailing list.
we can't ban newbies making newbie mistakes while learning, or else we will
grow old together because fresh meat is missing.
Chin Fang:
However, it's at the last stage I ran into an problem. I was trying
not to use syslog for logging. But it seems to be that I can't write
the logged info to STDERR, since the info would be sent to POP client
(I confirmed this using telnet to port 110).
Right now, I invoke
qmail Digest 20 May 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1007
Topics (messages 42044 through 42103):
time until people get "failure notice"
42044 by: Hans Sandsdalen
42046 by: John P. Looney
42047 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
42048 by: Hans Sandsdalen
SMTP-proxy and qmail
"Keven Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have successfully installed and test qmail with maildir but:
qmail-start is KILLING my system. I am using supervise and
tcpserver. I sometimes have upto 32 qmail processes and currently I
have no users on the system. I am running redhat 6.2. All
how can I start qmail automatically on FreeBSD boot
using daemontools and svscan script like this one:
#!/bin/sh
cd /service /usr/local/bin/svscan echo ' svscan'
it run normally when I run it after boot-up process but error
(qmail didn't start) when I use it for boot-up
how can I fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Date:Fri, 19 May 2000 18:23:54 CDT
To: Kai MacTane [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:Troy Frericks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I want to leave this list
At 01:19 PM 5/19/00 , Kai MacTane wrote:
At 5/19/2000 10:44 AM
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Peter Schuller wrote:
(ezmlm ML archive is down, and I find no mention of where the list is
located so I cannot subscribe to it or send to it; hence I am asking here)
Hello,
I want to make an ezmlm managed mailinglist moderated (it's an announce
list). It is stated
I'm trying to build an RPM for myself so when I do upgrades and such to my
system I can just install the RPM and make life easy on myself. My
question has to do with conf-spawn. In Bruce's RPM, it uses this to
define the conf-spawn value:
fds=`ulimit -n`
# let spawnlimit='(fds-6)/2'
echo
Thus said Lindsay Haisley on Fri, 19 May 2000 02:00:03 CDT:
A bare line feed is considered 'obsolete syntax' as defined subsequently in
section 4.1, 'Miscellaneous obsolete tokens'. Please note from the above
that while compliance with this draft requires that originating MTAs or
MUAs must
also sprach vdanen:
I'm trying to build an RPM for myself so when I do upgrades and such to my
system I can just install the RPM and make life easy on myself. My
question has to do with conf-spawn. In Bruce's RPM, it uses this to
define the conf-spawn value:
fds=`ulimit -n`
# let
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Green wrote:
On my system, this gives me a value of (1024-6)/2 or a value of 509. In
the conf-spawn file that comes with qmail it defaults to 120 and says it
can't be set about 255, so the value that comes out of Bruce's RPM is way
too high... I fixed this by
Clemens,
first of: if you want timestamps then integrate the last two lines from
| $setuidgid qmaill $tai64n 21 \
| $setuidgid qmaill $multilog /var/log/pop3d
to
| $setuidgid qmaill $multilog t /var/log/pop3d
Thanks for pointing this
What email client are you running? Most clients (Netscape, Outlook, Kmail)
allow you to specify your email address.
On Fri, 19 May 2000, kapil sharma wrote:
Hi,
I am having some strange problem. When ever I am sending mail from local
to local
user then it is adding the domain name for 2
Louis,
This can be fixed without any patching. The problem is with the way
qmail-popup sets up the file descriptors. Here's my run file for pop3
service:
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/var/qmail/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/bin/qtools
# this is ugly, but qmail-popup breaks things
I'm running Qmail with Vpopmail from inter7.com and I'd like to know
how I would forward one e-mail address to mutiple people. For example
messgaes sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Probably an easy question but I'm just not
Vincent Danen:
What would be a good average value for the silent concurrency limit and is
there a better way to figure it out on a system-by-system basis? Or
note that the concurrency-limit for either local or remote delivery
actually means the number of processes running concurrently to
Arisandy Arief:
how can I start qmail automatically on FreeBSD boot
using daemontools and svscan script like this one:
i have /etc/rc.local:
#!/bin/sh
PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/var/bin:$PATH"; export PATH
...
cd /service
echo -n "supervisor scanning services... "
if [ -x /var/bin/svscan -a -d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chin Fang) writes:
In the past two hours, I was reading qmail-popup.c and thus found out
the underlined line below was doing something unusual:
It is the behavior documented in the man page, though I'm not really
sure why it's written that way.
Once deleted, I could get
also sprach ino-waiting:
Vincent Danen:
What would be a good average value for the silent concurrency limit and is
there a better way to figure it out on a system-by-system basis? Or
note that the concurrency-limit for either local or remote delivery
actually means the number of
"Bro. Len Budney" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's not a problem at all. Bounce messages don't go to the reply
address, they go to the envelope sender.
Unfortunately, even with the magic of VERP, there are some systems out
there that are just so broken they bounce back to Reply-To: headers,
or
Hi,
Don't know if this is appropriate for the list, but here goes:
Has anybody successfully installed the scan4virus package with qmail 1.03 on
a FreebSD 4.0 system?
I'm trying to run the setup script that comes with the scan4virus package
and I get the following error:
"Whoa there!
It
clemensF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 21 May 2000 at 02:28:35 +0200
Vincent Danen:
What would be a good average value for the silent concurrency limit and is
there a better way to figure it out on a system-by-system basis? Or
note that the concurrency-limit for either local or
I've had a message sitting in a /var/qmail/queue/mess/* directory for more
than two days now and it hasn't been cleaned out. I though the INTERNALS
document stated that qmail-clean will automatically delete any message in
state S2 or S3 that's older than 36 hours.
Am I missing something, or is
On May 20, 2000 at 22:41:37 -0400, Martin Gignac twiddled the keys to say:
I looked in /var/qmail/queue/mess/ and found a message left lying around
that looked like it was never going to be deleted by qmail-clean. I manually
rm'ed the document in question and now qmail-qstat and qmail-qread
Chin Fang:
If you take out the 21, your tcpserver will write its info msgs to
console. In addition, the qmail-pop3d will still spit its output to
STDERR to POP clients. Please try it and you will see for yourself.
I just did (again, did once last night already).
i am very sorry that id
Louis,
It is the behavior documented in the man page, though I'm not really
sure why it's written that way.
I am hoping Dr. Dan Bernstein could shed some lights on this issue.
No. I couldn't figure it out either.
There's no obvious reason why both calls to strerr_warn1() shouldn't
print,
30 matches
Mail list logo
