Hi ALL,
I have the qmail-mysql (Iain Pattersen patch) running and I get the
following errors:
960186398.488070 delivery 40431: deferral:
Temporary_failure_in_qmail-lspawn./
I get them every minute or so - the local queue has grown considerably
since - ...
Can anyone please shed some light as
Ups, another problem... forgot about it before...
I have a few virtual domain on my system, and now I want to use the mail
address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same address on different
domains)...
There was no way to do this, so I somehow tracked it to the fact, that I had
a alias for info in the
Hi,
Two questions.
Seems my ~/.qmail never gets executed by Qmail, so I am not able to have a
functional maildrop or procmail. BTW, is ~/.qmail a script that gets
executed by QMail or is it a file that is read by it to know how to perform
to specific users.
Also I can't seem to get any info on
Goran Blazic wrote:
Hi...
After installing qmail on my system, suddenly there was no logging activity
anymore... Nothing new gets written into /var/log/messages anymore?!!?
Does anyone have any ideas?
What have you checked so far? Is syslogd still running?
Friends are those who,
Nuno Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
Two questions.
Seems my ~/.qmail never gets executed by Qmail, so I am not able to have a
functional maildrop or procmail. BTW, is ~/.qmail a script that gets
executed by QMail or is it a file that is read by it to know how to perform
to specific
Dear All
Does someone show me a patch for authentication to SMTP services in qmail ?
Thanks a lot
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
qmail Digest 5 Jun 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1023
Topics (messages 42648 through 42667):
Re: Does someone knows what is this about?
42648 by: Russell Nelson
mail.log; syslog
42649 by: Attila Csosz
Re: smtp relay setup (faq 5.4)
42650 by: John Stile
42651 by:
At 09:54 2000-06-05 +, Nguyen Hong Son wrote:
Dear All
Does someone show me a patch for authentication to SMTP services in qmail ?
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/index.html
K.
Following FAQ 5.4 steps for relay rules, I was was unsuccessful, but
tcpd is not where the faq says it will be, so could that be the problem?
Forget tcpd and use ucspi-tcp (tcpserver) instead. It's in the FAQ how to
do it.
Regards, Frank
I run a relatively low traffic mailserver.
It runs qmail smptd and pop3 from inetd.
I hear all the time that inetd sucks, but i never hear any reasons why.
So my question is: why does inetd sucks?
/Magnus Näslund
Hi all,
I've got some problems with my tcpserver. It is configured to relay for some
ip-adresses and block all others. I use the latest version of ucspi and I
installed it as described. For most of the ip-adresses, tcpserver works
fine, but in some cases, it allows relaying (with setting
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Magnus Naeslund wrote:
I run a relatively low traffic mailserver.
It runs qmail smptd and pop3 from inetd.
I hear all the time that inetd sucks, but i never hear any reasons why.
So my question is: why does inetd sucks?
Two that immediately come to mind:
No inbuilt
I run a relatively low traffic mailserver.
It runs qmail smptd and pop3 from inetd.
I hear all the time that inetd sucks, but i never hear any reasons why.
So my question is: why does inetd sucks?
/Magnus Näslund
It does not give the programs it runs any information
fine, but in some cases, it allows relaying (with setting RELAYCLIENT=""
!!!) for ip-adresses which should be blocked.
Which addresses?
Frank
Alright, what I am seeing is this.
~/.qmail is working, forward works swell for example, but I either cannot
get the program (the | program) to work or I can but it is the program
that's not working.
My specific problem is this:
in ~/.qmail I have
./Maildir/
| preline /var/local/bin/maildrop
I'm having some problems sending mail to a specific domain...
When qmail tries to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from our mail server
(212.49.139.237) and the sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED], bt.es mail
server says "Sender domain must resolve".
This don't happen when the mail server sends mails to
Hi ALL,
I have the qmail-mysql (Iain Pattersen patch) running and I get the
following errors:
960186398.488070 delivery 40431:
deferral:Temporary_failure_in_qmail-lspawn./
I get them every minute or so - the local queue has grown considerably
since - ...
Can anyone please shed some light as
At 11:59 AM +0100 6/5/00, Nuno Ferreira wrote:
Alright, what I am seeing is this.
~/.qmail is working, forward works swell for example, but I either cannot
get the program (the | program) to work or I can but it is the program
that's not working.
My specific problem is this:
in ~/.qmail I have
Dear List,
I sent Chris and now I am sending to this list this addition I made for
Chris Johnson's tarpit patch
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/tarpit.html.
I just made a patch to qmail-smtpd man's page to list the 2 new control
files and environment variables Chris's patch creates.
Rodrigo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this guy has set up qmail with $HOME/Mailbox delivery. Now he
wants to use ipop3d (part of uw-imap, he uses the RedHat 6.2
package) with $HOME/Mailbox. Do you have any idea how? Does
it run that way "out-of-the-box"?
I suggested him to use
On 14:24 5.06.2000, Petr Novotny could be heard musing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this guy has set up qmail with $HOME/Mailbox delivery. Now he
wants to use ipop3d (part of uw-imap, he uses the RedHat 6.2
package) with $HOME/Mailbox. Do you have any idea how? Does
Hi!
How can I get qmail to use QMTP between two boxes that there is a lot of
traffic between? I tried putting the respective IP adresses in
/var/qmail/control/qmqpservers, but that didn't do it.
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
- ORBS blocks "unfriendly" sites criticising ORBS
Is there a site with documentation on this? I'd like to
check it out for myself.
There is a bit more to it then that. Some people who disagree with how the
ORBS is run block their relay tests. The ORBS considers this grounds for
being
How can I get qmail to use QMTP between two boxes that there is a lot of
traffic between? I tried putting the respective IP adresses in
/var/qmail/control/qmqpservers, but that didn't do it.
qmqpservers is for QMQP, not for QMTP.
At the moment QMTP is supported by qmail-qmtpd and a program
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:27:49PM +0200,
Pablo Martínez Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some problems sending mail to a specific domain...
When qmail tries to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from our mail server
(212.49.139.237) and the sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED], bt.es mail
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:29:39PM +0200, Holger Haeffelin wrote:
I've got some problems with my tcpserver. It is configured to relay for some
ip-adresses and block all others. I use the latest version of ucspi and I
installed it as described. For most of the ip-adresses, tcpserver works
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
There isn't any MX or A record associated with hidratel.com. Some sites
check for the existance of an A record or MX record and refuse email
if there isn't one. Not all sites do this. This also might be a problem
with only some of the DNS servers authoritative for
Hello!
I'm evaluating qmail performance (qmail with vpopmail, one domain, 1
users) and I've found that under 20 clients queue grows VERY fast.
Each client retreives all mail from given account, and than send some mails
to it. In 3 minutes qmail running on fairly powerful box gives:
Hi everyone!
Where can I get more information about vpopmail api functions? I want to
make an html page where anyone could pop into and add as a users of
sqwebmail (a kind of Hotmail). I'm using qmail 1.03 and vpopmail.
Thanks in advance!!
Esteban Javier Próspero
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:53:29AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 10:51:36AM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
It's worse than that. The original version _did_ explicitly mention
qmail (and Postfix) as replacements for sendmail that would settle
the security problems. A
also sprach Esteban.Prospero:
Hi everyone!
Where can I get more information about vpopmail api functions?
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/vpopmail.html
I want to
make an html page where anyone could pop into and add as a users of
sqwebmail (a kind of Hotmail). I'm using qmail 1.03 and
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:37:30PM +0200,
Pablo Martínez Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
There isn't any MX or A record associated with hidratel.com. Some sites
check for the existance of an A record or MX record and refuse email
if there isn't one. Not all sites
There are nothing out of the ordinary in the logs.
With this configuration, however I am receiving the same mails several times
and the queue grows, which means I must be injecting the same mail in the
queue instead of forwarding it to another user.
I read the maildrop man page, but I cannot
More evidence that the person running ORBS is incompetent.
I now understand why I get these messages from ORBS dropped into my
postmaster box.
In what sense does ORBS think the described behavior of qmail is
insecure?
What problem do they refer to, anyways?
It certainly is annoying to get
Goran Blazic:
After installing qmail on my system, suddenly there was no logging activity
anymore... Nothing new gets written into /var/log/messages anymore?!!?
you might post /etc/syslog.conf and /etc/newsyslog.conf for us to check.
--
clemens
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:48:24AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
More evidence that the person running ORBS is incompetent.
He's not. I've spoken to him on several occasions and he is quite clueful.
I now understand why I get these messages from ORBS dropped into my
postmaster box.
You will
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:48:24AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
More evidence that the person running ORBS is incompetent.
He's not. I've spoken to him on several occasions and he is quite
clueful.
Not to restart another perennial flame-war, but why
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Len Budney wrote:
Not to restart another perennial flame-war, but why then does he
blacklist people who block his probes? Is it really his intention to
provide the service of blacklisting both a) open relays and b) people
who disagree with him?
As the mail admin for a
Forget about ORBS. Anyone using/caring about ORBS should reconsider his decision:
Before giving "judgement" over ORBS, please understand what they are doing
and the possible effects (both good and bad) for "you" as a mail admin.
- ORBS blocks "unfriendly" sites criticising ORBS
You should
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:06:55PM -0400, Len Budney wrote:
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:48:24AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
More evidence that the person running ORBS is incompetent.
He's not. I've spoken to him on several occasions and he is quite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 18:13, IDG New Media Support - Andr Paulsberg wrote:
What a mail admin chooses to do with is ORBS information is up to him,
and he may ignore some or all listings ORBS give out for "admin
refused".
How can I set up my filters to
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:13:57PM +0200, IDG New Media Support - André Paulsberg
wrote:
Forget about ORBS. Anyone using/caring about ORBS should reconsider his decision:
Before giving "judgement" over ORBS, please understand what they are doing
and the possible effects (both good and bad)
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Peter van Dijk wrote:
That is impossible. ORBS does not list a machine until it has received a
relayed test message. If you know of any false positives, let me know too
and I'd be happy to investigate. I have had several people run to me and
say 'ORBS listed me but I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 18:28, Peter van Dijk wrote:
- ORBS has IMHO too much false positives
That is impossible. ORBS does not list a machine until it has received
a relayed test message.
Second (or higher) level relay _is_ a false positive. My ISP
Hi,
second, i have set up control/virtualdomains without any problems
using the good faq. but, i haven't found anything about forwarding
emails. let's assume i have set up test-domain.com:testuser in
the virtual domain control file. now, any incoming mail is delivered
to the local user
My 2 rappen/centimes:
Second (or higher) level relay _is_ a false positive.
No it's not - positive is positive. You provide relaying or you
don't. Are you or are you not responsible for maintaining some standard of
net ethics?
My ISP has
been listed recently because they're doing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 19:01, Will Harris wrote:
No - advise them of their problem, and suspend mail service until they have
fixed their faulty servers.
Most ISPs have contracts with their network customers explicity forbidding
spamming of any
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:21:10PM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
[snip]
On 5 Jun 00, at 18:13, IDG New Media Support - André Paulsberg wrote:
What a mail admin chooses to do with is ORBS information is up to him,
and he may ignore some or all listings ORBS give out for "admin
refused".
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:36:04PM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
[snip]
On 5 Jun 00, at 18:28, Peter van Dijk wrote:
- ORBS has IMHO too much false positives
That is impossible. ORBS does not list a machine until it has received
a relayed test message.
Second (or higher) level
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 07:06:58PM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
[snip]
I have yet to see a contract saying "Thou shalt not run an open
relay."
Our contracts with CoLo's do, implicitly or explicitly. We are allowed to
block port 25 towards colo's (and we do) if we hear about an open relay.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 19:12, Peter van Dijk wrote:
The only correct choice is 1. If your customer has an open relay, block
them on your own smarthost until they fix their problem.
Oh thanks. In other words, you're giving me the following
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Peter Samuel wrote:
It has a rate limiting "feature" whereby it will stop servicing a port
for 10 MINUTES if it thinks the rate of incoming connections is too
high (I have flat lined a remote inetd with qmail-remote from a 14k4
modem). tcpserver doesn't care about rate, it
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 07:20:05PM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 19:12, Peter van Dijk wrote:
The only correct choice is 1. If your customer has an open relay, block
them on your own smarthost until they fix their problem.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 19:27, Peter van Dijk wrote:
If one of your customers runs an open relay, you should force your customer
into fixing it, or make sure yourself that they can't cause any damage.
Open relays found by spammers tend to cause great
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 Jun 00, at 12:02, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
inetd by default has the above behaviour, but can be overridden in the
configuration file to accept any number of connections.
That's bad, too. I want to limit the number of live incoming
It is possible to use a .qmail file with vpopmail...
I have tried a .qmail file in ~vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/user with
the lines
./Maildir/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but qmail tries to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and tries to
execute with sh "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I've also tried to use
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 07:36:43PM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
[snip]
On 5 Jun 00, at 19:27, Peter van Dijk wrote:
If one of your customers runs an open relay, you should force your customer
into fixing it, or make sure yourself that they can't cause any damage.
Open relays found by
!Hola Pablo!
I think you should put a .qmail-usuario under
~vpopmail/domains/mydomain.tld/.qmail-usuario. Look at vpopmail man page or
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/vpopmail.html the dot-qmail section.
Suerte!
Esteban Javier Próspero
From: Pablo Martínez Schroder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Goran Blazic:
address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same address on different
There was no way to do this, so I somehow tracked it to the fact, that I had
how is somehow? could you please describe this in more detail?
--
clemens
Pablo Martínez Schroder:
When qmail tries to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from our mail server
(212.49.139.237) and the sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED], bt.es mail
server says "Sender domain must resolve".
how about this: you either find the lines in the sources where this error
is raised
Johan Almqvist:
How can I get qmail to use QMTP between two boxes that there is a lot of
traffic between? I tried putting the respective IP adresses in
/var/qmail/control/qmqpservers, but that didn't do it.
how about this: you setup qmail-qmtpd on both machines to serve on a tcp-
port
hello,
I've come across HOWO recently added to the linux HOWTO's, written
by Dan Kuykendall, titled "Qmail VMailMgr and Courier-ImapHOWTO". This
HOWTO guided me though the prep/compile/install for
- ucspi-tcp
- daemontools
- supervise-scripts
- qmail
- vmailmgr
-
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:04:54PM -0300, Martin A. Langhoff wrote:
[snip]
Now, the symptoms I could gather:
- syslogd taking 50% processor time
syslog sucks. daemontools (which you installed) come with multilog which
does a far better job.
- command line utilities like
Why don't you use de qmailadmin program.
It does what you are trying to do. You can get it at the inter7's site.
-Mensagem Original-
De: Próspero, Esteban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: Segunda-feira, 5 de Junho de 2000 12:21
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 09:13:24AM -0700,
Ryan Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It makes perfect sense, from a certain point of view. The ORBS guys want
to list relays. The run across an address block that has a number of open
relays, and the adminitrators of that block aren't responsive
Except that sites that block probes rather than fix open relays really
belong in a different kind of list. I think the ORBS would be better
off just listing confirmed open relays. If they would do this, a lot
Peter van Dijk confirmed that we are listed in a different category from
regular
Our sun OS 2.7 mail server had a system panic on Friday and it rebooted. I
hadn't configured the boot scripts yet and our other sysadmin didn't call me
(I was on vacation).
This morning I saw that qmail hadn't started and sendmail (which had never
been configured to work) had queued all the
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 07:09:57PM +0200,
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That depends on your filtering software. It seems djb's rblsmtpd does not
have an option to change this. That sucks. Your choice is hereby reduced
(by DJB, not by any people at ORBS) to 'block everything ORBS
ORBS also lists tarpitting people, although as spam relays they are
unsusable, too.
Anybody clueful enough to do tarpitting should block relaying.
There exists sites which do not have a nice block of IP addresses
which describe all of their valid mail relay users. For such sites,
tarpitting
Bruno Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I will be able to use them again as I only want to block inputs
and outputs, since the ORBS seems to catch sites faster than the RSS.
That's because RSS requires evidence that the relay is actually being
abused, whereas ORBS will list any machine
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:17:06PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 07:09:57PM +0200,
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That depends on your filtering software. It seems djb's rblsmtpd does not
have an option to change this. That sucks. Your choice is hereby
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 05:19:49PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
ORBS also lists tarpitting people, although as spam relays they are
unsusable, too.
Anybody clueful enough to do tarpitting should block relaying.
There exists sites which do not have a nice block of IP addresses
which
clemensF wrote:
David Dyer-Bennet:
identical program invocations get to run their own copy of the program
text.
I don't believe this last bit is the case. It's clearly not the case
on Linux, anyway, as displayed by the various size numbers in 'top'.
but linux processes
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 04:57:30PM -0700, Eric Cox wrote:
clemensF wrote:
David Dyer-Bennet:
identical program invocations get to run their own copy of the program
text.
I don't believe this last bit is the case. It's clearly not the case
on Linux, anyway, as
There exists sites which do not have a nice block of IP addresses
which describe all of their valid mail relay users. For such sites,
tarpitting is a much better solution than relay blocking. MIT is one
of them (many of its mail relay users are customers of random outside
ISPs),
The amount of
Susan Short wrote:
Next question, is there another way I can send this mail without getting
sendmail to work?
One way to proceed is to divide up the queue into messages, and then
feed each message into qmail-inject.
You will need to "crack" your sendmail's method of storing its queue,
but
Hi all,
Is there any control file for qmail that will set a maximum recipient count
for any mail coming into qmail-smtpd?
Regards,
Marc-Adrian Napoli
Network Administrator
Connect Infobahn Australia
+61 2 9281 1750
Hi,
I would like to backup the users I created
with QMailAdmin (vpopmail users, not
UNIX users). Is it only backup passwd
file from vpopmail ?
If I lost my server, the only thing I need to
do is to override the vpopmail passwd ...
begin:vcard
n:Alves;Edilmar
tel;fax:+55(67)741-4530
Hi to all!
I'm using vpopmail to manage my virtualdomains.
Recently, I encountered one problem with one of my domain.
The e-mails for the domain do not get to their respective mailboxes, the
log for one particular session is attached below. It seem to complain
about not finding a certain
im trying to get qmail to deliever its mail using /bin/mail and i get this
line in the maillog:
Jun 5 21:53:48 ns1 qmail: 960256428.605530 delivery 8: deferral:
Unable_to_open_/bin/mail:_access_denied._(#4.2.1)/
any ideas?
thanks,
Charlie Chrisman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(606) 269-7946 Home
(606)
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:37:24PM -0400, Charlie Chrisman wrote:
im trying to get qmail to deliever its mail using /bin/mail and i get this
line in the maillog:
Jun 5 21:53:48 ns1 qmail: 960256428.605530 delivery 8: deferral:
Unable_to_open_/bin/mail:_access_denied._(#4.2.1)/
How did you
Bruno Wolff III:
Except that sites that block probes rather than fix open relays really
belong in a different kind of list. I think the ORBS would be better
off just listing confirmed open relays. If they would do this, a lot
yes, this makes sense.
--
clemens
Hi Folks;
I am upgrading a FreeBSD sendmail server to Qmail, did go through the FAQ
and docs extensively, qmail runs and I see all the processes running but
when I try to send mail to local user I get the following errors:
qmaili delivery 1: defferal: fastforward:_fatal:_
Mail seems to be building up my mail queue (I can tell from running qmail-
qstat). I am new to qmail so I don't know quite how everything works yet.
What would cause the mail to build up in the queue and not send, and how
would I fix it?
Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in
advance.
At 11:30 PM 6/5/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail seems to be building up my mail queue (I can tell from running qmail-
qstat). I am new to qmail so I don't know quite how everything works yet.
What would cause the mail to build up in the queue and not send, and how
would I fix it?
first
Hi to all,
I have manage to find the problem. It seem that the .qmail-default
contain incorrect info.
It was pointing to
| /home/vpopmail/bin/postmaster
But what puzzles me is :
How did that line get into the .qmail-default file in the first place?
The file is automatically managed by
on 6/5/00 8:20 PM, net admin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks;
I am upgrading a FreeBSD sendmail server to Qmail, did go through the FAQ
and docs extensively, qmail runs and I see all the processes running but
when I try to send mail to local user I get the following errors:
qmaili
i Got Return mail from my Mail server Follow like
this
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mbox.samart.co.th.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work
out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
203.146.42.135
It goes something like the receiving host received the message but the connection was
cut off before an acknowledgment was sent back to you. The mail was probably sent
already.
For more info, the qmail list archive can be very handy. :-)
It's at http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000
This is what
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 08:41:11PM -0300, Ricardo D. Albano wrote:
I think the best choice is to write a qmail-remote wrapper.
My scan4virus harness (replaces/augments qmail-queue) reports this info...
http://www.geocities.com/jhaar/scan4virus/
-Original Message-
From:
Bruno Negro wrote:
Why don't you use de qmailadmin program.
It does what you are trying to do. You can get it at the inter7's site.
Negative... Qmailadmin from INTER7.COM is great to admin tasks not for
people who wants to POP and create their own accounts. In qmailadmin
only postmaster can
91 matches
Mail list logo
