On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 04:15:40PM +1000, Brendan Laws wrote:
> HI there,
>
> I was wondering if anyone can help me with this problem, I am
> running redhat version 6.1 and I cannot get POP3 connections logging in my
> syslog to /var/log/mail
>
> smtp syslog works fine but POP is cau
1. i could't find out, how to get pop3d work with shadow passwords, so i'm
using qpopper [and therefore i have to switch to mailbox format]
So - is it possible to use pop3d with shadow passw?
2. Next annoying problem. My Qmail is up and running. I'm using it with
serialmail. ppp0 connection gets
>>> I want to block incoming of mails from few domains for few users (POP and SMTP
>both) only.
>>>
>>> If i put these domain in the badmailfrom file it blocks for all the users.
>
> The other, easier way is to just put the email addresses in badmailfrom.
>
> I.e. instead of putting domain.com in
HI there,
I was wondering if anyone can help me with this problem, I am
running redhat version 6.1 and I cannot get POP3 connections logging in my
syslog to /var/log/mail
smtp syslog works fine but POP is cause me trouble and I can not see
any referance to POP/syslog in the FAQ's
I use qmail with serialmail and fetchmail. I conect
to my ISP with dial up.All messages for out are stored in
"/var/qmail/alias/pppdir/" and that is OK.All mesages witch I receive (with
fetchmail) are in "/var/qmail/qlias/pppdir/" too. And that is problem. Why
this mesages not in maildir of
When I run make check for courier-imap on Solaris7 sparc using gcc-2.95.
I get the following output. Make check doesn't finish: it just
hangs with the last two lines "broken pipe". However, if
I go ahead and install it anyway, courier-imap appears to work fine.
Are the following errors something
As I'm sure you are all aware, qmail's implementation of the LAST command
seems to endlessly confuse several MUAs, especially if they choose to
leave their mail on the server.
Is there any way around this? Any patches?
I know 'LAST' has been deprecated, but we're getting a lot of flack from
o
> Charles Cazabon:
> >> But why one alias, ~alias/.qmail-mail, works fine? That was where I got
> >> confused and started to ask ... ;-)
>
> > I don't know, and couldn't tell you without looking at your whole setup. But
excusee moi, je suis hercule poirot! je pens que les accounts `mail' e
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:47:46AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Peter van Dijk writes:
> > ORBS does not list a machine until it has received a relayed test
> > message.
>
> Then why does Alan suggest that qmail is an open relay by default
> simply because its smtp server accepts more mail th
I am wondering if this is a DNS issue, a gauntlet firewall issue, or why
this isn't working.
I have 2 sites in different locations. One has DNS domain: ecorp.com the
other has DNS domain dev.ecorp.com.
Mail works fine to ecorp.com but when trying to deliver to dev.ecorp.com
mail gets rejected
I just installed the latest ezemlm on my system and have just discovered a
serious problem with a group mailbox.
I have a domain ace.org.nz where all email is put into one mailbox. (I have
normal users as well) This was working well. The domain is setup in the
virtualhosts file and points a mailbo
Jens Georg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 09 Jun 2000:
> is there no way to get forwarding working with the "." ?
Yes, there is a way. Use : instead of the . in the dot-qmail file.
eg. .qmail-bob:miller for an address of "bob.miller".
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [E
hi,
i would like to forward incoming emails for an special user of a virtual
domain to an external email-address. my emailformat is always i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which nearly all of my customers want to have.
all emails to vdomain.com are delivered to a local user "vdomain" and
fetched via pop3
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 01:42:32PM -0400, Jim Simmons wrote:
> It isn't the rpm's fault, it is actually linuxconf. Even if you did a
> by-the-book (i.e. following Dan's instructions to the letter) qmail install,
> linuxconf will follow the /usr/sbin/sendmail link and change the permissions
> on /
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yep. See /var/qmail/doc/PIC.local2alias. alias will get control of mail only
>if a user account doesn't exist.
>> But why one alias, ~alias/.qmail-mail, works fine? That was where I got
>> confused and started to ask ... ;-)
> I don't know, and co
Thank Chris!
There is one more instance: system alias for root works, ignoring
the account ~root ... is there an exception?
Zhiliang
> > You mean in qmail the user account precedes system alias?
> > (in sendmail it is opposite).
>
> Yep. See /var/qmail/doc/PIC.local2alias. alias will get co
Hi,
I think it's also possible to disable the sendmail module in linuxconf.
regards
christian
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 03:18:32PM -0500, Zhiliang Hu wrote:
>
> > You said that "mail" and "web" are regular user accounts. If that's the case,
> > then ~alias/.qmail-mail and ~alias/.qmail-web will never be consulted.
>
> You mean in qmail the user account precedes system alias?
> (in sendma
Hi all. A while back I mentioned modifying the qmailmrtg stuff to work
with multilog formatted files and some of you have asked me about them.
They are almost complete .. the mods seem pretty easy really, though I
am not much of a programmer. I think I have it working. The queue script
did not req
> You said that "mail" and "web" are regular user accounts. If that's the case,
> then ~alias/.qmail-mail and ~alias/.qmail-web will never be consulted.
You mean in qmail the user account precedes system alias?
(in sendmail it is opposite).
But why one alias, ~alias/.qmail-mail, works fine?
Yesterday the message "warning: trouble marking local/xx/xx;
message will be delivered twice!" appeared in my log over 1000 times!
This was followed by over 1000 "unable to unlink local/xx/xx" and
135,000 "trouble opening local/xx/xx" messages!
This is a daily occurrence for which I
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 01:29:53PM -0500, Zhiliang Hu wrote:
>
> Ok, here they are:
> File Content
> -- ---
> /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster mail
> /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-listmaster mail
> /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-list-admi
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 03:19:48PM -0400, cdowns wrote:
> i am trying to add a bulk list to my server and using this script i get
> the runtime error: ( ezmlm-sub: fatal: dir and dot must start with slash
> ), does anyone know what this means? my script is below. thanks
>
> christopher m downs
>
i am trying to add a bulk list to my server and using this script i get
the runtime error: ( ezmlm-sub: fatal: dir and dot must start with slash
), does anyone know what this means? my script is below. thanks
christopher m downs
#!/bin/sh
## this is to use ezmlm-sub function
## to add a list of
Ok, here they are:
File Content
-- ---
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster mail
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-listmaster mail
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-list-admin mail
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-webmaster web
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-www
It isn't the rpm's fault, it is actually linuxconf. Even if you did a
by-the-book (i.e. following Dan's instructions to the letter) qmail install,
linuxconf will follow the /usr/sbin/sendmail link and change the permissions
on /var/qmail/bin/sendmail for you. It does this even if you don't have
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 12:20:49PM -0500, Zhiliang Hu wrote:
> I have following mail forwarding set up in /var/qmail/alias/:
>
> (1) postmaster -> mail
> listmaster -> mail -> admin1, admin2, ...
> list-admin -> mail
>
> (2) webmaster -> web
> www-admin -> web -> admin1, admi
Three things:
First, linuxconf is NOT owned by RedHat. Therefore, it's not RedHat's
problem. (You might want to convey your concerns to the linuxconf
maintainers)
Second, this is a GREAT example of why one might not want to trust someone
else's RPM packages.
Third, if installing qmail via
I have following mail forwarding set up in /var/qmail/alias/:
(1) postmaster -> mail
listmaster -> mail -> admin1, admin2, ...
list-admin -> mail
(2) webmaster -> web
www-admin -> web -> admin1, admin2, ...
www -> web
All the forwarding indicated by "->" is made
Hi,
some days ago another guy mentioned that he has detected wrong permissions
on his RedHat system using
qmail at the wrapper "/usr/sbin/sendmail".
I have reproduced this on 2 systems:
Scenario:
RedHat 6.2 (including linuxconf 1.17r2)
sendmail-RPM deinstall
qmail-SRPM
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 03:20:25PM +0200, OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg wrote:
> > I want to block incoming of mails from few domains for few users (POP and SMTP
>both) only.
> >
> > If i put these domain in the badmailfrom file it blocks for all the users.
> >
> > kindly suggest how it can be done
Isn't Russell Nelson's convert-and-create script doing this?
>From the Qmail web page:
Russell Nelson's convert-and-create script will create Maildirs for all
users who receive mail and will convert their /var/spool/mail mbox-format
mailboxes into messages in a Maildir.
I am no Perl wizard, but this works:
lithium:~$ more /usr/local/bin/convertbox
#!/usr/bin/perl
# usage: convertbox [mbox] [dir for maildir to placed]
#
# ie: convertbox /usr/mail/blah/mbox /var/qmail/mailhome/user/Maildir
require 'stat.pl';
($mbox, $maildir) = @ARGV;
chdir($maildir) ||
> Enrique Vadillo:
> I'm switching more than 15.000 users to Qmail using maildirs,
> i'd like to know what is the best tool i can use in order to
> convert /var/mail/user mboxes into ~user/Maildir format and to
> convert ~user/Mail/folder into ~user/Maildir/.folder format too.
formail from the p
I'm switching more than 15.000 users to Qmail using maildirs,
i'd like to know what is the best tool i can use in order to
convert /var/mail/user mboxes into ~user/Maildir format and to
convert ~user/Mail/folder into ~user/Maildir/.folder format too.
thanks!
Enrique-
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 09:41:40AM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
> also sprach kbo:
> >
> > Does anyone know what happened to the ezmlm.org site?
>
> ezmlm.org appears to be on hold by NetSol, waiting for payment. Fred Ringel
> dropped off the face of the earth some time ago. Fred L. is probably
> h
> Snowcrash wrote:
>
>
> I currently have a catchall account set up and it succesfully
> delivers to one user. However I would like to have the mail delived
> to multiple people. I'm not quite sure how to do this. My current
> .qmail-default is:
>
> | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail ''
>
Looking through the life with qmail document it appears that migrating a
sendmail virtusetable over to qmail would be very difficult. If I am
reading it correctly it appears that it uses the format of:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:prepend
Is there any way to have qmail read the virtualuser table as
[EMAIL
also sprach kbo:
>
> Does anyone know what happened to the ezmlm.org site?
ezmlm.org appears to be on hold by NetSol, waiting for payment. Fred Ringel
dropped off the face of the earth some time ago. Fred L. is probably
horribly busy with umpteen things.
Just a little state of disarray... :)
/
Does anyone know what happened to the ezmlm.org site?
Ken Jones
inter7
> I want to block incoming of mails from few domains for few users (POP and SMTP both)
>only.
>
> If i put these domain in the badmailfrom file it blocks for all the users.
>
> kindly suggest how it can be done for individuall users.
You'll need to make a short script,
and add it into these user
I want to block incoming of mails from few domains for few users (POP and
SMTP both) only.
If i put these domain in the badmailfrom file it blocks for all the users.
kindly suggest how it can be done for individuall users.
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:35:16AM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
> also sprach magnus:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:04:04AM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
> > > also sprach mwangu:
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know what has happened to www.ezmlm.org
> > >
> > > It appears to be on hold by N
also sprach magnus:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:04:04AM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
> > also sprach mwangu:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Does anyone know what has happened to www.ezmlm.org
> >
> > It appears to be on hold by Network Solutions, awaiting payment. :(
>
> Sure? Not anymore at least.
fwh
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:04:04AM -0400, Peter Green wrote:
> also sprach mwangu:
> > All,
> >
> > Does anyone know what has happened to www.ezmlm.org
>
> It appears to be on hold by Network Solutions, awaiting payment. :(
Sure? Not anymore at least.
https://payments.networksolutions.com/cgi
Not using the patches from www.qmail.org, but this works for me
Script to convert to a format qmailanalog likes
#!/usr/bin/perl
while (<>) {
if (my($s,$t,$rest)=/^\@.(\w{15})(\w{8})(.*)/) {
$s = hex($s);
$t = hex($t); $t =~ s/500$//;
$_ = "$s.$t$rest\n";
}
} continue {
p
also sprach mwangu:
> All,
>
> Does anyone know what has happened to www.ezmlm.org
It appears to be on hold by Network Solutions, awaiting payment. :(
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Go not unto the Usenet for advice, for you will be told bo
Try:
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' /home/vpopmail/domains/foo.com/user
& [EMAIL PROTECTED]
& [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc.
Regards!
--jmr
Snowcrash writes:
>
> I currently have a catchall account set up and it succesfully delivers to one
>user. However I would like to have the mail
I currently have a catchall
account set up and it succesfully delivers to one user. However I would
like to have the mail delived to multiple people. I'm not quite sure how
to do this. My current .qmail-default is:
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail ''
/home/vpopmail/domains/foo.co
qmail Digest 8 Jun 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1026
Topics (messages 42824 through 42876):
Re: Suggestion for mailing list manager?
42824 by: clemensF
42825 by: clemensF
dot-qmail extensions ...
42826 by: mwangu
42827 by: Ondrej Sury
42834 by: Russell Nels
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 12:41:54AM -0700, mwangu wrote:
> All,
>
> Does anyone know what has happened to www.ezmlm.org
>
> Has it been moved? Is there a mirror anywhere which I
> can have a look at?
http://ezmlm.x42.com/
/magnus
At 10:09 AM 6/8/00 +0200, you wrote:
>hi irwan,
>
> > I think you compare orange with onion
> > you should compare qmail-pop3d with qpopper I think.
> > because vpopmail is NOT a pop3 daemon.
>
>oops! ok, then, can you explain to me, what vpopmail really is ?
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/FAQ
vp
>First give the two servers different
locals.
They have domain.com both in locals..but different
hostname.domain.com in locals..?
>If you use a virtual domain anyway you can put
the 4 user addresses >into virtualdomains too. I didn't test if this
takes precedence over the >domain, but you ma
At 10:00 AM 6/8/00 +0200, Jens Georg wrote:
>hi,
>
>are their significant differences between vpopmail and qpopper ? i heard
>rumours saying qpopper is a big security hole ??
I think you compare orange with onion
you should compare qmail-pop3d with qpopper I think.
because vpopmail is NOT a pop3
hi,
are their significant differences between vpopmail and qpopper ? i heard
rumours saying qpopper is a big security hole ??
--
jens
---
department computer science, university of dortmund
linux ... life's too short for re
All,
Does anyone know what has happened to www.ezmlm.org
Has it been moved? Is there a mirror anywhere which I
can have a look at?
Thank you,
M
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com
First give the two servers different locals.
> On our mail server we have a virtual domain under a user.
If you use a virtual domain anyway you can put the 4 user addresses
into virtualdomains too. I didn't test if this takes precedence over the
domain, but you may try it.
Else there is still
Have a strange case..
On our mail server we have a virtual domain under a
user. the .qmail-default file says ./Maildir/ so all the mail goes to
there...then i push the mail to those people when their online with maildirsmtp
(they have a linux dial up router with qmail on it). this works g
58 matches
Mail list logo